View Full Version : Socionics types and their overall moods
Kljoki
28 Jul 2006, 10:21 AM
ILE- explorative; light-hearted curiosity; optimistic; focused on interests; interested in ideas; usually upbeat; detached curiosity
SEI - soft, helping; gentle smile; touch naturally; comfort oriented
ESE - strong tastes and preferences; enthusiastic and forceful about likes and dislikes; socialites; emotional involvement; reflect values of community; large emotional range
LII - detached critical analysis; clear and independent thought and worldviews; appearance of self-control
EIE - alarm, dramatism, restraint; purposeful emotions and involvement
LSI - tough, controlling, serious, decisive, tough-minded, disciplined, mistrustful; stand their ground
SLE - forceful; demanding of others; go-getter; not easily intimidated; ready for battle
IEI - wacky, goofy, dreamy; clown; interested in people?s inner life and where people are going with their emotional life
LIE - unbridled optimism; like movement; energetic; opportunistic; like to test limits
ESI - concerned about proper behavior; stand their ground; hard to convince; conservative views and methods
SEE - flair, playfulness; socialites; physical center of attention; hands-on involvement in world around them
ILI - goofy; don?t reveal inner life; interested in processes; passive relaxedness; ironic attitude
IEE - playfulness; tinge of irony; acceptance; frivolous; warm curiosity about people and relationships
SLI - soft blankness; internal independence; hard to impress; not easily excited; (emotionally) cool
LSE - always busy with projects; practical and skeptical; action oriented; professional; active involvement
EII - gentle but have firm principles; demonstrate positive attitude; willingness to share your world
I found these useful. I was able to pick a type from this set before I knew my real type and it was accurate. I think I could be used as a self diagnosis tool but I'm not sure.
ESE, IEE or IEI I can't decide! :S
Probably IEE?
mancroft
28 Jul 2006, 10:38 AM
Reference table from:
http://www.answers.com/topic/socionics
functions description name person type
Si Te Ni Fe Ne Fi Se Ti SLI (Sensory-Logical Intratim) Craftsman Jean Gabin ISTp
Se Ti Ne Fi Ni Fe Si Ti SLE (Sensory-Logical Extratim) Legionnaire Zhukov ESTp
Si Fe Ni Te Ne Ti Se Fi SEI (Sensory-Ethical Intratim) Mediator Dumas ISFp
Se Fi Ne Ti Ni Te Si Fe SEE (Sensory-Ethical Extratim) Politician Caesar ESFp
Ti Se Fi Ne Fe Ni Te Si LSI (Logical-Sensory Intratim) Inspector Maxim Gorki ISTj
Te Si Fe Ni Fi Ne Ti Se LSE (Logical-Sensory Extratim) Director Sherlock Holmes ESTj
Fi Se Ti Ne Te Ni Fe Si ESI (Ethical-Sensory Intratim) Conservator Theodore Dreiser ISFj
Fe Si Te Ni Ti Ne Fi Se ESE (Ethical-Sensory Extratim) Bonvivant Victor Hugo ESFj
Ni Te Si Fe Se Fi Ne Ti ILI (Intuitive-Logical Intratim) Critics Balzac INTp
Ne Ti Se Fi Si Fe Ni Te ILE (Intuitive-Logical Extratim) Seeker Don Quijote ENTp
Ni Fe Si Te Se Ti Ne Fi IEI (Intuitive-Ethical Intratim) Lyricist Bradbury INFp
Ne Fi Se Ti Si Te Ni Fe IEE (Intuitive-Ethical Extratim) Psychologist Tom Sawyer ENFp
Ti Ne Fi Se Fe Si Te Ni LII (Logical-Intuitive Intratim) Analyst Descartes INTj
Te Ni Fe Si Fi Se Ti Ne LIE (Logical-Intuitive Extratim) Entrepreneur Jack London ENTj
Fi Ne Ti Se Te Si Fe Ni EII (Ethical-Intuitive Intratim) Humanist Dostoyevsky INFj
Fe Ni Te Si Ti Se Fi Ne EIE (Ethical-Intuitive Extratim) Mentor Hamlet ENFj
Shimpei
28 Jul 2006, 11:17 AM
My functions are as follows:
Si > Fe > Fi > Se > Ni > Te > Ti > Ne
What do you say, Kljoki?
Kljoki
28 Jul 2006, 12:44 PM
My functions are as follows:
Si > Fe > Fi > Se > Ni > Te > Ti > Ne
What do you say, Kljoki? Actually, they're more like this
http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/1778/exportwizard2hy2.gif
but sure, why not (http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=12692).
Shimpei
28 Jul 2006, 12:53 PM
Actually, they're more like this
http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/1778/exportwizard2hy2.gif
but sure, why not (http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=12692).
quite intricate and obscure
spasmfrog
28 Jul 2006, 04:49 PM
I'm torn between ILI and LII based on the descriptions in the original post. They need regular expression syntax for borderline cases, like [(LI)|(IL)]I or something. (Yeah, I probably borked that, haven't used Unix for a LONG time.)
Kljoki
28 Jul 2006, 04:52 PM
I'm torn between ILI and LII based on the descriptions in the original post. They need regular expression syntax for borderline cases, like [(LI)|(IL)]I or something. (Yeah, I probably borked that, haven't used Unix for a LONG time.) How do you feel about IEI?
Kljoki
28 Jul 2006, 05:46 PM
I can not decide which one is most like me because I don`t know what they mean by "passive relaxedness; ironic attitude". :lol: seriously, you don't know what "ironic attitude" means and you've been on this site for over 6 months?
EDIT: Not to mention "passive relaxedness"
zhang_bob
28 Jul 2006, 05:48 PM
:lol: seriously, you don't know what "ironic attitude" means and you've been on this site for over 6 months?<_<
Kljoki
28 Jul 2006, 05:52 PM
<_< Ever seen Attila post recently? That's passive relaxedness with an ironic attitude.
spasmfrog
28 Jul 2006, 05:52 PM
How do you feel about IEI?
IEI - wacky, goofy, dreamy; clown; interested in people?s inner life and where people are going with their emotional life
I'm interested as a matter of curiosity, I want to know what motivates people because so much of it seems to be nonsense. I wouldn't consider it a defining characteristic though.
I do tend to be goofy and dreamy and I try to play the clown at times to lighten the mood or make a point, but ILI and LII describe me better overall.
Ka.avik
28 Jul 2006, 06:02 PM
How do you feel about IEI?
as someone who agrees w/SpasmFrog: no. Too many people-ish intrests in IEI. I'm not goofy unless I'm very tired, and I'm moderately sure I'm never dreamy. ILI seems a better personal match than LII, but it partly depends on the subject matter I'm applying myself to. With my horses or the neighbor's dogs I'm much more relaxed, and willing to have a playful outlook on life. Computers, and typology systems, are much more a thing for detach-ed contemplation.
But people? people are weird.
Oh, and I want (eventually) to get back to you on Se-as-mechanic, and something else I left you hanging about in that other thread of yours....I've got the quote at home, so maybe tonight.
Off topic, slightly: does socionics consider Se to be the same function the MBTI means, when they describe Se?
zhang_bob
28 Jul 2006, 06:07 PM
Ever seen Attila post recently? That's passive relaxedness with an ironic attitude.:huh: her only posting non-serious replies.
Sally
28 Jul 2006, 06:08 PM
Different moods at different times..... Especially all the variations of logical+intuitive.
As usual, socionics doesn't provide any particular insight I didn't know before.
Kljoki
28 Jul 2006, 06:16 PM
as someone who agrees w/SpasmFrog: no. Too many people-ish intrests in IEI. I'm not goofy unless I'm very tired, and I'm moderately sure I'm never dreamy. ILI seems a better personal match than LII, but it partly depends on the subject matter I'm applying myself to. With my horses or the neighbor's dogs I'm much more relaxed, and willing to have a playful outlook on life. Computers, and typology systems, are much more a thing for detach-ed contemplation.
But people? people are weird. I think you're LII.
Oh, and I want (eventually) to get back to you on Se-as-mechanic, and something else I left you hanging about in that other thread of yours....I've got the quote at home, so maybe tonight. I completely forgot about that. Sure, why not.
Off topic, slightly: does socionics consider Se to be the same function the MBTI means, when they describe Se? Yes they do and no it isn't.
Kljoki
28 Jul 2006, 06:21 PM
:huh: her only posting non-serious replies. I'm not quite following.
Different moods at different times..... Especially all the variations of logical+intuitive.:confused:
zhang_bob
28 Jul 2006, 06:32 PM
I'm not quite following.In other words posting shit. I think we must be having a translation problem because I don`t know what the hell you are on about.
Dr. Haight
28 Jul 2006, 07:34 PM
Several posts moved to the following location at the request of OP creator:
http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=12881
Kljoki
28 Jul 2006, 07:51 PM
In other words posting shit. I think we must be having a translation problem because I don`t know what the hell you are on about. You wanted an example, I provided. What's there not to understand?
Kristiana
6 Aug 2006, 01:35 AM
Based on moods alone, I can fit any of these:
ILE- explorative; light-hearted curiosity; optimistic; focused on interests; interested in ideas; usually upbeat; detached curiosity (this fits me pretty broadly)
LII - detached critical analysis; clear and independent thought and worldviews; appearance of self-control (yeah, this is me intellectualizing, which I tend to do a lot)
LIE - unbridled optimism; like movement; energetic; opportunistic; like to test limits (this is me when i'm hypomanic :P)
IEE - playfulness; tinge of irony; acceptance; frivolous; warm curiosity about people and relationships (this is the persona I generally present when I'm emotionally healthiest)
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.0.7 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.