Socionics Test - Quadra Values ...

[rmcnew]

Short and not very complicated ....

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/ET2.cgi

[rmcnew]

Socionics INTj can be an appropiate type if you are MBTI INTp ...

[fairgeek]

Considering how I have scored previously on socionics tests, that relatively short test did not seem to be very accurate...

And your quadra is:


Gamma


ENTj or ESFp


edit: Just realized Gamma quadrant includes two other types, which means I now consider this test to be accurate. But I do think more questions would provide a more revealing outcome.

[fairgeek]

So how do you usually score?

It seems accurate, I just edited my original post.

I am a freak, I scored INTp on socionics and INTP on myers-briggs as of a year ago. I do not know what I am now.

[Fingers]

Beta

ISTj or INFp

hmmm, these Socionics tests get werider and werider

[Kaveri]

What is socionics? What are Socionics tests? How are they different from MBTI tests? Why do the results look so similar and what's the difference? Why are the Socionics tests so widely criticised?

Anyway, I got

"Gamma

ISFj or INTp"

Whatever that means.

EDIT. Wait...! Now I did it again and got

"Alpha

INTj or ISFp"

=WHAT?

[EmmaPeel]

Alpha


ENTp or ESFj

[INTrePid]

Beta


ISTj or INFp

[libertarianjim]

Gamma: ISFj or INTp

[EmmaPeel]

And your quadra is:

Gamma

ISFj or INTp

What??! This makes no sense to me. The questions are so weird.

[rmcnew]

What is socionics? What are Socionics tests? How are they different from MBTI tests? Why do the results look so similar and what's the difference? Why are the Socionics tests so widely criticised?

Socionics is based off of Jungian theory ... it uses a slightly diffrent ordering of the functions and the psyche model is slightly diffrent. Socionics tests are diffrent, because the tendency is to test for individual introverted and extroverted functions and not those based on a dictonomy. MBTI tests tend to totally disregard testing for specific introverted and extroverted functions, and usually generalizes between the two stereotypically (which is a flawed approach, but can not be better than socionics for the fact that it is harder to test for individual functions). The results look similar, because I choose to use the MBTI way to show the types, and not the Socionics way. Socionics tests are widely criticised, because people do not often understand socionics and the tendency is to believe (falsely) that for some reason MBTI is better for the meer fact that it is more widely known to westerners. Both have strengths and critical flaws and neither one is really any better at representing Jungian theory and philosophy over the other.

[Lurker]

And your quadra is:


Beta


ESTp or ENFj


That's just bizarre.

[Nighthawk]

And your quadra is:

Beta

ESTp or ENFj

-------

I'm not even remotely close to either of those two.

[puzzled-observer]

gamma
entj esfp

very strange - doesn't seem to be correct.

[BAJ]

Okay, I just found out about socionics. I took a brief test, which classified me as something I'm clearly NOT.

I'm NOT an extrovert, for example, as I've ended up browsing the books or talking the potted plant in the corner at every party I've ever been to.

In addition, I see that a socionics website and forum was basing type on physical appearance. That's scary. That's like the division between Tutsies and Hutu in Rwanda. That kind of division always leads to genocide. The NAZIs were big on physical characterisitcs too.

I felt stong identification with my INXP profiles when I took the Myers-Briggs around 18 years ago.

Yet, I'd love to find new models that led to deeper revelation and to help with vocational retasking. The test I took for socionics must have been to short, and I'm seeking better tests and more in depth information.