New 50 Question Socionics Test ...

[rmcnew]

50 questions ... it is actually another experimental one, but it isn't quite as bad. It gives you your type the Socionics way (not the MBTI way).

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi

Please post the short link it gives you and not just state ... thanks.

[mancroft]

ILI

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&Q1=1&Q32=1&Q2=1&Q47=2&Q39=2&Q5=2&Q33=1&Q3=2&Q4=2&Q6=2&Q34=1&Q7=1&Q8=1&Q38=2&Q9=1&Q49=2&Q35=1&Q10=1&Q46=1&Q31=1&Q11=1&Q50=2&Q37=1&Q12=1&Q13=1&Q14=1&Q15=2&Q41=1&Q48=1&Q16=2&Q17=2&Q18=2&Q42=1&Q19=2&Q20=1&Q21=1&Q43=1&Q22=2&Q23=2&Q45=2&Q24=1&Q44=2&Q25=1&Q26=1&Q36=2&Q27=1&Q28=1&Q40=2&Q29=1&Q30=2

[Trystorp]

I

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=6&S=&T=6&QF=&E=0&I=8.8

[DevNull]

ILI

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=4&S=&T=2&F=&E=0&I=5.33333333333333

[aeon]

IEI

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=4&S=0&T=0&F=2&E=0&I=9

[intpgolfer]

I
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=8&S=0&T=8&F=0&E=0&I=4.33333333333333

[ptide]

IEI

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=6&S=0&T=0&QF=2&E=0&I=22.3333333333333

[zhang_bob]

LSI

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=&S=2&T=3&F=&E=0&I=5.6

[Lurker]

ILI

Whoever wrote the test needs to correct the spelling errors.

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=10&S=&T=4&QF=&E=0&I=15.75

[CasaK]

ILI

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=10&S=0&T=8&QF=0&E=0&I=16.75

[Mr Pink]

LII

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=6&S=&T=10&QF=&E=0&I=4.6

[rmcnew]

Woah ... alot of you guys are coming out socionics INTj[LII] and INTp[ILI] ...

[mancroft]

Woah ... alot of you guys are coming out socionics INTj[LII] and INTp[ILI] ...

Well, what do you expect?

[rmcnew]

Well, what do you expect?

Hmmm ... I expect I need to figure out a decent way to test against socionic functions TiNe [LII] and NiTe [ILI], without making things too bizaar like some of my previous experimental socionics tests. This is probably the least bizaare out of all of them [if you take some time to look at the past ones I have posted, you will know what I mean by this!]

[mancroft]

Well, use us as guinea pigs again when you come up with a new test.

[Jennywocky]

ILI

I found some of the questions confusing or unsuited for the average person.

(For example, someone who is versed in personality theory might understand "I look at myself subjectively," but the average person will have trouble interpreting a vague question like that. And especially when the questions are generalized into these basic concepts, the average concrete person will get more confused. Sticking with explicit behaviors will help.)

Also, some times the alternative is not clear, or the question is ambiguous.

For example, 44. You tend to stick to the facts as they stand.

Is the contrast, "You do not stick to the facts as they stand"? Does this mean the person habitually lies or colors the truth?

And do people who color the truth actually believe and accept they are coloring the truth... or does what they are saying SEEM to be the truth to them? Most people will answer yes, to #44, regardless of actual type. So I don't consider the question to hold much merit, unless restated.

Off-hand, I would also point out that the first clump of questions seemed very INTP-based (as per MBTI).

--

I also disagree with the ILI = NiTe assessment that commonly appears in socionic literature. NiTe is a much worse match for me than TiNe, when I read the descriptions; I've tested as LII in some other tests, this one I came out as ILI.

[intpgolfer]

Woah ... alot of you guys are coming out socionics INTj[LII] and INTp[ILI] ...

What is an [I] in socionics?

I
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=8&S=0&T=8&F=0&E=0&I=4.33333333333333

And what is the link to determine I, LII, ILI, etc?

Thanks

[caybo]

26. You reject anything that is... or unacceptable to you.

Is it just me or is that question sorta redundant, like asking "do you like things that are pleasant to you?"

EDIT: I took the test, the results weren't very accurate it said I was an INF, which isn't right, perhaps I should have answered questions more truthfully.

EDIT EDIT:Oh, yeah I forgot to put the type: ILI

[Rajah]

ILI

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=6&S=&T=4&F=&E=0&I=7.66666666666667



#15 - You tend to leap before you jump.

That was particularly silly.

[BerberElla]

EII

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=6&S=&T=&QF=8&E=0&I=4.33333333333333

[Pooja]

E

I definately wasn't expecting that-- I wonder where I went wrong.

[spasmfrog]

LXI

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=0&S=0&T=4&F=0&E=0&I=13.2

Hrm, yeah, some of the questions could have been clearer. I especially liked the one where it asks if you're the type to leap before you jump. :p

[waxwing]

ILI.

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=10&S=&T=8&F=&E=0&I=2.16666666666667

Pretty sure I'm ILE, though.

[dubbeltop]

EXI

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=0&S=0&T=0&F=4&E=0&I=2.33333333333333

[Fingers]

LIE

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=2&S=0&T=4&QF=0&E=5.33333333333333&I=0

no idea what it means to be one :)

[fripping]

I
just I? that's it? aren't there supposed to be more letters such as "ILE", "IEI" etc?
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=8&S=0&T=8&QF=0&E=0&I=9
:think: socionics smocionics
"100 dollars in the bank is just 100 dollars in the banks"? i know the question is about what possibilities you may see, but not only does it have a weird plural in it, but i was inclined to agree with it just because it was a true statement of fact. only the background of the test prompted me to think more deeply about what money in the bank really means as it relates to personality.

i've only seen socionics types categorized in mbti-style, where can i find descriptions of socionics types by the letters this test assigns?

[camille]

IEI
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=10&S=0&T=0&QF=4&E=0&I=10.8333333333333

You had some gramatical errors. Besides the one fripping noted, #20.

[Lamia Mistral]

LXI

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=0&S=0&T=6&QF=0&E=0&I=13.2

I'm assuming the "X" represents a 0? Otherwise I think I'm missing it's purpose.

[Kljoki]

i've only seen socionics types categorized in mbti-style, where can i find descriptions of socionics types by the letters this test assigns?
Here you go.

http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/7454/quadraae8.gif

[fripping]

Here you go.

http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/7454/quadraae8.gif

that's useful, but I still don't see my designation up there. my result was just the letter "I". what does that mean?
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.c...8&QF=0&E=0&I=9

[fairgeek]

LII

but that wasn't accurate, because I went back and changed maybe 2 fields and then had LIE. Usually I score as INTp on socionics, so I was surprised at the INTj & ENTj results this time. Maybe 50 questions is too short to be accurate?

I had E on the 3rd try.

Or maybe I am just living a LIE...

[Kljoki]

that's useful, but I still don't see my designation up there. my result was just the letter "I". what does that mean?
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.c...8&QF=0&E=0&I=9

Well those are just test results. They don't mean anything. Plus the test is not really what I would call reliable.
Have you looked at your relations with other people? Read Jung's descriptions of functions? Do you at least know your temperament?

[fripping]

Well those are just test results. They don't mean anything. Plus the test is not really what I would call reliable.
Have you looked at your relations with other people? Read Jung's descriptions of functions? Do you at least know your temperament?
yeah i think i've got myself pegged pretty well, i just didn't understand the test result.

[Hamro]

LII


http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=2&S=&T=6&QF=&E=0&I=10

[lbloom]

LII

[AMDG]

ILI - 441

[Prothero]

SXI...

...but as usual with tests, the options given are too restrictive, forcing too many compromise answers. Since that usually invalidates some part of the analysis, it is probably a good thing this test didn't struggle with the meaning behind the results.

Or am I simply being schizoid, again.

[Utopmk]

IEI (http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=8&S=&T=&F=2&E=0&I=4.75)

Indicates that I am ever so slightly more of a feeler than a thinker.

I don't see what good a test is without a summary for the type.

If there are descriptions can someone link me?

Otherwise, it is worthless.

[int]

If there are descriptions can someone link me?

Otherwise, it is worthless.

Agreed.

http://www.socionics.us/theory/dichotomies.shtml

[Utopmk]

Agreed.

http://www.socionics.us/theory/dichotomies.shtml

Thank ya. :)

[Kljoki]

IEI (http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=8&S=&T=&F=2&E=0&I=4.75)

Indicates that I am ever so slightly more of a feeler than a thinker.

I don't see what good a test is without a summary for the type.

If there are descriptions can someone link me?

Otherwise, it is worthless.

That's kind of tricky. Type in socionics is for the most part theoretical so you have to first understand the theory to understand type.

[firch]

E

I definately wasn't expecting that-- I wonder where I went wrong.
On the internet we are all extroverts. :banana:

EDIT: Oh, BTW I am an I.

[euterpenc]

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=8&S=&T=4&F=&E=0&I=8.5

[Dark Razor]

LII
http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=4&S=0&T=8&QF=0&E=0&I=5

[Amethyst]

LXI

http://socion.info/cgi-bin/IEFTEST.cgi?P=1&N=&S=&T=2&F=&E=0&I=1.75

nearly become XXX

:devil: