MyPersonality.info (MB, Multiple Intelligences) with Customizable Badges/Profiles

[Gliebster]

Hello everybody.

I finished a new personality test site that I'd like to share and get some feedback on. The core of the site is a free Myers-Briggs test and there is also a Multiple Intelligences test which I think is a nice compliment to a person's MB results.

The tests are obviously nothing brand new, but what is new is how the results are spit out in a "share-friendly" way as a profile page (to share with friends) or badge graphic (for blogs, forum signatures...), both totally customizable.

Will you guys take a look at it and let me know what you think - particularly if your results come out reasonably accurately.

http://www.mypersonality.info

Thank you. :banana:

[hereandnow]

Hello everybody.

I finished a new personality test site that I'd like to share and get some feedback on. The core of the site is a free Myers-Briggs test and there is also a Multiple Intelligences test which I think is a nice compliment to a person's MB results.

The tests are obviously nothing brand new, but what is new is how the results are spit out in a "share-friendly" way as a profile page (to share with friends) or badge graphic (for blogs, forum signatures...), both totally customizable.

Will you guys take a look at it and let me know what you think - particularly if your results come out reasonably accurately.

http://www.mypersonality.info

Thank you. :banana:

Can your advertising budget handle this type of exposure? :rofl:

It looks interesting.

[Rajah]

Done. I liked the tests, and thought they were reasonably accurate.


Here are my results:

MBTI: INTP - The "Engineer"
Temperament: NT (Intellectual) Primary Function: Introverted Thinking
Population: 2.5% (4% male, 1% female)

Extraverted - 37%; Introverted - 63%
Sensing - 37%; Intuition - 63%
Thinking - 58%; Feeling - 42%
Judging - 11%; Perceiving - 89%


Multiple Intelligences Test:

Verbal/Linguistic - 90%
Logical/Mathematical - 85%
Musical - 75%
Intrapersonal - 70%
Bodily/Kinesthetic - 50%
Visual/Spatial - 45%
Interpersonal - 35%
Naturalist - 20%





Actually, I'd already taken the tests, based on your sig.

[hereandnow]

I took the one test.

Introverted

100%


Intuition


95%



Thinking

89%



Perceiving

95%


AND

Logical/Mathematical 80%

Intrapersonal 65%

Verbal/Linguistic 65%

Bodily/Kinesthetic 50%

Visual/Spatial 50%

Musical 45%

Interpersonal 40%

Naturalist 25%

[Methofelis]

http://www.intpcentral.com/uploads/67.JPG

Introverted: 100%
Intuition: 89%
Thinking: 95%
Perceiving: 95%

[MacGuffin]

*mutters*

Time to start banning all pics in signatures...

[prplchknz]

Introverted
100%



Intuition
100%



Thinking
89%



Perceiving
95%




Intrapersonal
90%
Logical/Mathematical
60%
Verbal/Linguistic
60%
Naturalist
55%
Bodily/Kinesthetic
50%
Musical
45%
Visual/Spatial
40%
Interpersonal
0%

[Methofelis]

*mutters*

Time to start banning all pics in signatures...

... I didn't add it to mine ...! Do not be mad!

[hereandnow]

... I didn't add it to mine ...! Do not be mad!

Ditto - Too many of those things look like Vegas with a four day drunk on.

[mancroft]

Excellent site you've got there!

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/70.png

[Jennywocky]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/73.png (http://fortunato.mypersonality.info)

I agree with MacGuff.

I noticed that GlobalChatter seems to enjoy putting large pics in the sigs, but I find them very distracting over time, and sort of self-indulgent.

The tone of this forum is to have more low-key sigs and focus on the avatars, if anything, since they're out of the text column and thus don't interfere with serious discussion.

I think the badges are pleasant-looking enough, otherwise... just not very practical for sigs.

--

I also do not personally think that the percentages for the MBTI pairs are useful, unless the paired functions are close to equal. (In this sort of situation, the test is showing some ambiguity over which function is preferred.)

For the rest, depending on the question set, the degree away from the middle doesn't really reflect a consistent distance from the middle. I received three 100%'s on my test, but I would not say that I am completely introverted (and not extroverted at all), completely intuitive (and not sensing at all), or completely open-ended (and not closure-oriented at all). In real life, I prefer some degree of extroversion, sensory experience, and closure to things... otherwise I could not function.

Like wise, just because I get a 75% (for example) in introversion does not mean that I pick an introverted course of action 3/4 of the time. There's not really a correlation between the percentage score and my actual behavior/intentions. That is because each questions is and "either/or" one, then simply summed and averaged. Percentages are very specific numbers, yet they don't really tell us anything very specific... they just show the preferred preference. The strength of it is still mostly questionable.

I understand, for aesthetic reasons, why you would want to show the percentage bars. (I think they make the badge "look better." I just don't really know if they are useful, in terms of accurately describing type.

[shum]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/75.png

[Pooja]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/74.png (http://pooj719.mypersonality.info)

[PonderBee]

INTP - The "Engineer"

Extraverted 0%; Introverted 100% :huh:
Sensing 11%; Intuition 89%
Thinking 79%; Feeling 21%
Judging 26%; Perceiving 74%

Naturalist 95%
Bodily / Kinesthetic 85%
Logical/Mathematical 80%
Intrapersonal 75%
Visual/Spatial 70%
Verbal/Linguistic 70%
Musical 45%
Interpersonal 40%

[Ivy]

INFP - "The Dreamer"

I enjoyed the test, but there were a lot of questions I wanted to answer "both" to.

[Dr. Haight]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/78.png (http://haight.mypersonality.info)

[Jennywocky]

INFP - "The Dreamer"

Holy macaroni.

Ivy is going through a personal identity crisis.

[Rajah]

I enjoyed the test, but there were a lot of questions I wanted to answer "both" to.Me too....


On a different note, we're getting a lot closer to making Ivy an INTP.

[MacGuffin]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/82.png?r=vxdrtj

[Jennywocky]

Me too....On a different note, we're getting a lot closer to making Ivy an INTP.

Ah, yes. The transformation is almost complete. Soon she will be one of us.

[BerberElla]

INFP - The "Dreamer"
Temperament: NF (Visionary) Primary Function: Introverted Feeling
Population: 2% (1.5% male, 2.5% female) Full INFP Profile >>
(description, famous people, careers...)

Extraverted 37% Introverted 63%

Sensing 21% Intuition 79%

Thinking 16% Feeling 84%

Judging 32% Perceiving 68%
---------------------------------------
Verbal/Linguistic 100%
Intrapersonal 70%
Musical 65%
Bodily/Kinesthetic 55%
Interpersonal 50%
Naturalist 45%
Visual/Spatial 45%
Logical/Mathematical 35%

Cool site, I may direct a few more people over there as its a bit more straight forward for them and easier to use.

[Jezebel]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/81.png

Yeah, I agree with a lot of what Fortunato said. It doesn't really show strength of preference. Only slightly preferring each option can make one come out with 100%. They could, in fact, really be borderline in preferences despite this.

That said, I think mine happened to come out fairly accurate. I would describe myself as strongly preferring introversion and thinking. I'm more middle ground with J/P and N/S.

I'm not sure what to think of the multiple intelligences test. Naturalist somehow seems like an odd #1 for me. I do like nature and animals, but I wouldn't have placed it at the top. The careers don't really interest me. I think it was just the particular questions that were asked.

[Ivy]

Holy macaroni.

Ivy is going through a personal identity crisis.

Heh. Nah, I've gotten INFP before, especially on the cognitive functions tests. I seem to be FiNe.

Depending on the way the questions are phrased, I've also gotten ISFJ, INFJ, ISFP, and even INTP. I've been having an identity crisis my whole life... seems rather Fi, doesn't it?

[Nightning]

*chuckles* As usual I get placed into INFP :P

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/84.png

I dislike the multiple intelligence test... the questions doesn't fit very well for me.

[Dansker]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/87.png (http://justurbs.mypersonality.info)

[Prothero]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/85.png (http://tenty.mypersonality.info)

[targo]

I wanted a gray area in some places....

[Gliebster]

Wow, you guys are like a swarm. Thanks for all your feedback. I appreciate it.

Good point about slightly preferring one over the other on each question causing the bar to go to 100%. I'm going to make note of that and consider a rating system for the future because it would be cool to see the true degree of each preference rather than the black or white tendency.

[Rajah]

I seem to be FiNe.Cute. :)

[targo]

I got an ESFP..... but I am not that social, and then did it again and thought more and got an INFP that was a new one as I am clearly an E although it was almost 50/50 split.

I find that tests give you an idea of where you are and then actually reading the descriptions seem to solidify the personality.

[Gliebster]

I find that tests give you an idea of where you are and then actually reading the descriptions seem to solidify the personality.

For sure. I'm wondering if I need to make a bigger note at test completion to really, really encourage them to read about their type to confirm. I do imagine a lot of people take it without doing any reading at all.

[Jennywocky]

Wow, you guys are like a swarm. Thanks for all your feedback. I appreciate it.

Good point about slightly preferring one over the other on each question causing the bar to go to 100%. I'm going to make note of that and consider a rating system for the future because it would be cool to see the true degree of each preference rather than the black or white tendency.

Yes, if the questions were more a rating scale than pure black and white, that would help some.

Sorry that I only gave the criticism before. There was much that was good about the site... and as far as visual appearance goes, I think the graphics and such look good ... which will help you acquire some widescale usage.

[nagrom]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/98.png

[Randomnity]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/100.png

I liked the MBTI test, it was slightly different from many others out there, which was nice. I see a lot of you got a bunch of 100%'s, but I think mine at least are fairly accurate (I know I have a very high P, high T, and moderate N and I).

I don't really like the multiple intelligence test though...a lot of the questions seem pretty random, and it would also measure preference, not true ability (anyone can think they have a good voice and be horrible, for instance).

It's also not terribly accurate. I have a lousy kinesthetic sense. And I disapprove of 'Naturalist' being an intelligence. It's just an interest.

[Dansker]

Our of curosity, is there any reason why interpersonal intelligence isn't measured given it was one of Gardner's original identified inteligences?

[MacGuffin]

Our of curosity, is there any reason why interpersonal intelligence isn't measured given it was one of Gardner's original identified inteligences?
I think if it is too low it isn't listed. I see it on his for example.

[Dansker]

I think if it is too low it isn't listed. I see it on his for example.

Thanks MacGuffin.

Gliebster, how many of the multiple intelligences does it measure? Is there any reason why it lists only the top 7 in the banner box?

[digesthisickness]

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e92/digesthisickness/entp1.jpg

despite wanting to choose both for a few, it still turned out almost exactly the same as always.

[Birdsnest]

Yes, pretty good.

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/108.png?r=8fmm8k


As a Naturalist, I'd go with Botanist, Gardener, Geologist or Park Ranger myself. It IS an awareness/intelligence, so I like having Naturalist being listed. It helps categorize people too, so I like it on the test.

Naturalist Intelligence Multiple Intelligences (Free Test)

The Naturalist intelligence has to do with how we relate to our surroundings and where we fit into it. People with Naturalist intelligence have a sensitivity to and appreciation for nature. They are gifted at nurturing and growing things as well as the ability to care for and interact with animals. They can easily distinguish patterns in nature.

Note that this intelligence is the newest added to the theory of Multiple Intelligences and is often criticized as being an interest rather than an intelligence.

Common Characteristics
Bothered by pollution
Enjoys having pets
Likes to learn about nature
Enjoys gardening
Appreciates scenic places
Feels alive when in contact with nature
Likes to camp, hike, walk and climb
Notices nature above all other things
Conscious of changes in weather
Career Matches
Conservationist
Gardener
Farmer
Animal Trainer
Park Ranger
Scientist
Botanist
Zookeeper
Geologist
Marine Biologist
Ecologist
Veterinarian


People with Visual intelligence are artistic. They are very aware of their surroundings and are good at remembering images. They have a great sense of direction. They like to draw, paint and read maps. They learn best through drawings and visual aids.

Common Characteristics
Good at solving visual puzzles
Enjoyed geometry in school
Good at drawing
Can visualize pictures in head
Notices colors and shapes
Enjoys photography
Good with directions
Can remember places vividly
Good at artistic composition
Likes books with pictures
Career Matches
Artist
Architect
Graphic Designer
Engineer
Fashion Designer
Interior Decorator
Photographer


Intrapersonal Intelligence Multiple Intelligences (Free Test)

People with intrapersonal intelligence are adept at looking inward and figuring out their own feelings, motivations and goals. They are introspective and seek understanding. They are intuitive and typically introverted. They learn best independently.

Common Characteristics
Introverted
Prefers working alone
Philosophical
Self-aware
Perfectionistic
Often thinks of self-employment
Enjoys journaling
Intuitive
Independent
Spends time thinking and reflecting
Likes learning about self
Career Matches
Psychologist
Philosopher
Writer
Theologian

I don't do everything on this logic list, but I am an Accountant, I do like to categorize, so some of it applies.

Logical/Mathematical Intelligence Multiple Intelligences (Free Test)

People with Logical intelligence are abstract thinkers and are attracted to logic and reasoning. They are good at investigation and scientific processes. They learn best by logic.

Common Characteristics
Can easily do math in their head
Good at strategy games
Have a mind "like a computer"
Really like math
Enjoy science experiments
Organize things by category
Abstract thinker
Look for a rational explanations
Wonder how things work
Career Matches
Scientist
Mathematician
Lawyer/Attorney
Doctor
Accountant
Bookkeeper
Computer Programmer
Researcher
Financial Planner

[Jezebel]

And I disapprove of 'Naturalist' being an intelligence. It's just an interest.

I second this. I know it's mentioned in the site's description that it's controversial and that some other sites list it, but personally I'd strike it off. I don't think I have anything innate that I learn by using nature intelligence. That's like listing historic, technological, and scientific (other subjects I tend to be interested in) as types of intelligences. If I do know more about them than average, I think it's more due to another type of "intelligence" helping me understand them and drawing me to them.

[heirophant]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/109.png (http://heirophant.mypersonality.info)

Hm, well I'm usually borderline Feeling/Thinking but mostly on the F side - and I definitely identify with being INFP over INTP. But that's the result I got from answering honestly. Also usually my Intuition is higher. The rest of it looks about right.

[Krill]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/112.png (http://krill.mypersonality.info)

[coolio_free]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/119.png (http://coolio2free.mypersonality.info)


i finally know my type ESTP

[joft]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/124.png (http://joft.mypersonality.info)

[zserf]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/121.png (http://zserf.mypersonality.info)
Despite other peoples complaints about black and white options, I prefer them.
I have a tendency to not think through surveys, mostly because I'm not to concerned with the outcome and making it an either/or is beneficial because otherwise I'd probably just put neither for everything. If you're going to do that please put it in the form:

A, Neither, B

as to many options tends to cause a recession towards the mean for me. No one likes to admit they're an "extremist"

[Trystorp]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/125.png

[outmywindow]

Not exactly a surprise, but ---

Introversion: 95%
Intuition: 79%
Thinking: 95% (eat that meanlittlechimp! ;) )
Perceiving: 89%

Verbal/Linguistic: 90% (By the way, there was a grammatical error in one of the questions)
Logical/Mathematical: 85%
Intrapersonal: 70%
...And the rest.

[Gliebster]

Thanks MacGuffin.

Gliebster, how many of the multiple intelligences does it measure? Is there any reason why it lists only the top 7 in the banner box?

Verbal/Linguistic
Logical/Mathematical
Visual/Spatial
Bodily/Kinesthetic
Musical
Intrapersonal
Interpersonal
Naturalist

There's a lot of different opinions about the Naturalist intelligence (the whole MI theory actually). I'm not sure what to think about it myself but thought it would be interesting to stick it in the test to see what happens and note it's controversy.

I think black and white Q's are good for determining the type, nailing it as well as possible. But I do see now they don't make the best graphs since people do seem to come out as extremists. I'm worried though that with a rating system that allows people to give wishy-washy answers for anything accuracy in determining the type will go down. So what I'm thinking is maybe an optional "after test" test that would then let the users give the answers that correspond to their type a rating. Thinking out loud.

[I dont post much]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/144.png (http://nkvie.mypersonality.info)

[AcidGoethe]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/149.png (http://acid2goethe.mypersonality.info)

[Mr Pink]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/151.png (http://mrpink.mypersonality.info)

[cafe]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/153.png (http://cafe.mypersonality.info)

[Alv]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/155.png (http://alverena.mypersonality.info)

[Ghost-Girl]

Nicely arranged site. I like it.

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/157.png (http://notonboats.mypersonality.info)

[SolitaryWalker]

Results of Multiple Intelligences Test
Here are your results for the Multiple Intelligences test. Click the links below for more information.


Logical/Mathematical 80%

Intrapersonal 70%

Verbal/Linguistic 70%

Naturalist 30%

Bodily/Kinesthetic 20%

Interpersonal 10%

Musical 0%

Visual/Spatial 0%






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Capitu]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/159.png (http://capitu.mypersonality.info)

[epsilon72]

I'm new here - here's mine.

bah - site won't let me post image links.

Introverted - 89%
Intuitive - 79%
Thinking - 53%
Perceiving - 74%

Musical - 90%
Logical - 80%
Naturalist - 75%
Visual/Spatial - 70%
Verbal/Linguistic - 55%
Intrapersonal - 55%
Bodily/Kinesthetic - 35%

So I'm INTP rather than INFP by only 4%....is that unusual?

[SolitaryWalker]

I'm new here - here's mine.

bah - site won't let me post image links.

Introverted - 89%
Intuitive - 79%
Thinking - 53%
Perceiving - 74%

Musical - 90%
Logical - 80%
Naturalist - 75%
Visual/Spatial - 70%
Verbal/Linguistic - 55%
Intrapersonal - 55%
Bodily/Kinesthetic - 35%

So I'm INTP rather than INFP by only 4%....is that unusual?


Yeah I'd say so... INTPs are very thoroug-going Thinkers... INFPs are thorough-going feelers....


Here is the function order for INTPs

Introverted Thinking
Extroverted Intuition
Introverted Sensing
Extroverted Feeling

INFP

Introverted Feeling
Extroverted Intuition
Introverted Sensing
Extroverted Thinking.

You are more likely to be an INTP and not an INFP from what I gather... INFPs tend not to enjoy logic very much and even those who are masters at still tend not to describe themselves as very logical..

Kierkegaard was a master logician and has shown it in his Critique of philosophy of Hegel... yet spent much of his time denouncing the logic worshippers in much of his writings and insisting on being subjective and feeling oriented... thats Fi from you from a very quintissential INFP...

[Doctor-Alvis]

Nuts to url-posting requirements. This is my 3rd post now. Surely I can be trusted by now.

badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/161.png

What's this multiple intelligences thing mean? I'm mediocre in many fields? Screw you, online test.


I took the spiritual gifts test for fun. Apparently I make a sub-par Christian.

[cafe]

Nuts to url-posting requirements. This is my 3rd post now. Surely I can be trusted by now.

badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/161.png

What's this multiple intelligences thing mean? I'm mediocre in many fields? Screw you, online test.


I took the spiritual gifts test for fun. Apparently I make a sub-par Christian.
But you have Balki in your avatar, so surely God will cut you some slack.

[bluebell]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/164.png (http://felicityfran.mypersonality.info)

I like the graphical output. Its much easier for me to scan everyone's type as I've been reading this thread than the lists with %'s.

INTP is me. Logical is me, love math, always doing mental arithmetic or running models in my head.

Not so sure about accuracy of Visual Spatial:
Good at solving visual puzzles
Enjoyed geometry in school
Good at drawing
Can visualize pictures in head
Notices colors and shapes
Enjoys photography
Good with directions
Can remember places vividly
Good at artistic composition
Likes books with pictures

I am HOPELESS with directions and picturing how to get somewhere, even the roads to my house where I lived for many many years. :stupid: And I hated geometry, even though I really like math. So, not sure about this one.

[aries]

100% I
90% N
74% T
60% P

I'm usually less P than that, and more T

[Stoned_Rider]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/165.png (http://stonedrider.mypersonality.info)

Pretty accurate I'd say, except that I'm probably a bit more balanced on the T/F axis.

Edit: Anyone who actually bothered to change the default colours/fonts is a true Sensor :P

[I dont post much]

Edit: Anyone who actually bothered to change the default colours/fonts is a true Sensor :P

if you actually noticed you must be one too! :highfive:

and actually yes, it did bother me to change the color. using my sensor function is painful.

[Kyrielle]

I'd like to point out that your thinking/feeling questions are not exactly accurate. Feeling doesn't have to do with the heart and feelings (by which I mean emotions as that is the common implication with the word feelings and the common association people make when the word "heart" is mentioned) only...it has more to do with ethics. Someone with an F preference will make decisions about how things apply to their values/morals. It is as much about using logic and your mind as it is for someone with a thinking preference.

I understand what you were meaning to say, however, by saying "heart" and "feelings"...(like making decisions on how you feel about something personally--comparing it to your values--or making decisions based on how "right" it feels--which would probably be comparing it to a mroal standard). Just need to make sure the wording is precise for anal people like me who pay a lot of attention to word choices. ;)

I do like your site. It's nice and organised and well thought out.

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/166.png (http://kyrielle.mypersonality.info)

[Zero Angel]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/165.png (http://stonedrider.mypersonality.info)

Pretty accurate I'd say, except that I'm probably a bit more balanced on the T/F axis.

Edit: Anyone who actually bothered to change the default colours/fonts is a true Sensor :P
I thought the point of MBTI testing were to determine, with high probability, a certain type. Ambiguity is a flaw in the test itself, not a personality trait.

Also, I consider an ambiguous T/F scale as having to do more with high (though not necessarily skilled) Fe usage in INTP types (where Fe is sometimes inverted into Fi when the INTP is not considerably socialized).

Oh, here's mine:
http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/169.png (http://zeroangel.mypersonality.info)

[I dont post much]

(where Fe is sometimes inverted into Fi when the INTP is not considerably socialized).


what does that mean>?

[Zero Angel]

I'm saying that Fe is applied to external things ('people') and where it cannot be applied externally, it is inverted and applied inwards instead.

[I dont post much]

No, I meant "when the INTP is not considerably socialized". I should have been more specific, sorry.

[Zero Angel]

I mea, 'in present circumstances', inhibited extraverted functions. I'm talking about Ne and Fe here. If a person lives as a hermit, for example, you can say that they are 'not considerably socialized' regardless of past circumstances, since extraverted functions do tend to decay if introverted functions overpower them too much.

[Gliebster]

I'd like to point out that your thinking/feeling questions are not exactly accurate. Feeling doesn't have to do with the heart and feelings (by which I mean emotions as that is the common implication with the word feelings and the common association people make when the word "heart" is mentioned) only...it has more to do with ethics. Someone with an F preference will make decisions about how things apply to their values/morals. It is as much about using logic and your mind as it is for someone with a thinking preference.

I understand what you were meaning to say, however, by saying "heart" and "feelings"...(like making decisions on how you feel about something personally--comparing it to your values--or making decisions based on how "right" it feels--which would probably be comparing it to a mroal standard). Just need to make sure the wording is precise for anal people like me who pay a lot of attention to word choices. ;)

I do like your site. It's nice and organised and well thought out.

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/166.png (http://kyrielle.mypersonality.info)

Thank you for this information.

[Kyrielle]

You're quite welcome.

[Niffer]

Perosnality Type- ENFP
Extraverted: 95%
Intuitive: 63%
Feeling: 79%
Perceiving: 79%

Multiple Intelligences Test
Naturalist 95%
Bodily/Kinesthetic 90%
Interpersonal 90%
Musical 90%
Visual/Spatial 80%
Intrapersonal 70%
Logical/Mathematical 60%
Verbal/Linguistic 55%

[InvisaLife]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/203.png (http://invisalife.mypersonality.info)
Woot woot!

[Bluehaze]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/226.png

[dubbeltop]

ISTJ - The "Examiner"

Verbal/Linguistic 50%
Bodily/Kinesthetic 45%
Intrapersonal 45%
Visual/Spatial 30%
Musical 30%
Logical/Mathematical 30%
Naturalist 25%
Interpersonal 25%

["?"]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/230.png (http://functianalyz.mypersonality.info)

[Ferrus]

I finished a new personality test site that I'd like to share and get some feedback on. The core of the site is a free Myers-Briggs test and there is also a Multiple Intelligences test which I think is a nice compliment to a person's MB results.
Complement. :)

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/232.png (http://ferrus.mypersonality.info)

[matryoshka]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/235.png (http://kitoma.mypersonality.info)

[cafe]

Don's results. (http://mcpickle.mypersonality.info/)

[meshou]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/242.png (http://meshou.mypersonality.info)

Hmm.

[glosoli]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/253.png (http://sjlewis.mypersonality.info)

Possibly the first time I've been typed as something other than INTP....though I liked these questions better and the results seem reflective of me. Close enough on the thinking/feeling side to go either way I guess.

[Gliebster]

Complement. :)

Dang, I've been spelling it wrong all my life.:banghead:

Maybe now my Linguistic score will go up.

[Gliebster]

Maybe you guys can give me some good NT feedback on something. I've been thinking about how some of you (and others elsewhere) have said the black or white questions tend to cause extremist results. As somebody said, slightly preferring one over the other every time causes the graph to show 100%. I think the black or white questions are good in determining a person's type but they may not produce the best result graphs.

I want to add a very slight rating system and want to do it by having TWO options for each answer instead of one. Right now you choose one answer or its opposite. I would change it so you choose "Mostly True" or "Always True" for one answer or for the other. Choosing "Always True" (2 points) would give the answer twice as much weight as "Mostly True" (1 point). Percentage calculated by dividing total points by total possible. There would be no Sometimes/Never since that would be to choose the other answer (still no neutral, we want to force a response). An example:


I see life

a) as it is
[ ] Mostly True [ ] Always True

--or--

b) as it could be
[ ] Mostly True [ ] Always True

1. Do you agree that this would produce better graphs?

2. Do you think this would affect the overall accuracy when determining type?

I'm going to put this forum up on the credits page since you guys have been a real value to me.

[meshou]

I wouldn't do that. It's confusing interface.

The ones that do similar seem to do the following:


I see life:
As it is [] [] [] [] As it should be

As for accurate percentages, you seem to have a test that's as accurate as any other. There's not really a gold standard.

[Zero Angel]

It seems accurate, because there is less ambiguity in the results. However, it may just be skewed more towards an IN results than other tests. We need some sensors to conduct our experiments on (and while you're at it pass the puppy)

[TaylorS]

Nice site!

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/301.png (http://taylors.mypersonality.info)

[Avengardh]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/327.png (http://aven.mypersonality.info)

Generally I get INTP but I could have gone with both answers a lot.

[Watermark]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/330.png (http://synch.mypersonality.info)

[aether]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/745.png (http://sardina.mypersonality.info)

[ohtarie_aranel]

It definitely has me as an INTP, but the second test makes me seem like an introspective athletic naturalist which is not completely true. I enjoy nature and athletic activity, but not so much that it outweighs my love for language and logic. Then again, my results were all pretty close. Here were my results:

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/0/798.png (http://ohtarie.mypersonality.info)

[Thrusthamster]

I loved that forum the few days it was up. But now I've registered here and on similarminds instead.

[Xenolith]

http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/9127/typean3.jpg

*beep beep*

It seems that I have forgotten to activate my Homo Sapiens emulator module.

[Mercurial]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/1/15400.png

[wannabe1985]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/1/15570.png (http://wannabe85.mypersonality.info)

the site is nice, the tests need more range.

[Alisha Sharie]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/1/15572.png (http://lishkersch.mypersonality.info)

Here's my results. I couldn't find the spiritual gifts test.

[MacGuffin]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/1/15572.png (http://lishkersch.mypersonality.info)

Here's my results. I couldn't find the spiritual gifts test.

We have uncovered another SJ spy!

[Ferrus]

We have uncovered another SJ spy!
Do you have the firing squad primed? Best do it before sunset.

[vulcan]

I didn't realize that mypersonality.info's creator posted here.

I really appreciate that site.

[skwayred]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/2/29711.png (http://skwayred.mypersonality.info)

[Shoot!]

I like this site alot. I got INTP with some musical thinking.
http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/2/29718.png (http://thehumanipod.mypersonality.info)

[Sugarbooger]

Holy shit look.
http://tweemo.mypersonality.info/

Introverted 95%
Intuition 95%
Thinking 74%
Perceiving 100%

Are those strong or what?
I'm concerned I didn't answer everything truthfully. I may have decided I'm an INTP so I gave the answers INTPs are supposed to give. But I tried not to.

[dissonance]

"When making decisions I
don't consider the feelings of others
consider the feelings of others"

"Talking about feelings and emotions is
difficult
easy"

these questions are both scored wrong on this site.

"don't consider the feelings of others " scores as F
"difficult" scores as F also

look at the page source, it's pretty easily decipherable.

[Sugarbooger]

I want to add a very slight rating system and want to do it by having TWO options for each answer instead of one. Right now you choose one answer or its opposite. I would change it so you choose "Mostly True" or "Always True" for one answer or for the other.

I like having two choices since you can answer quickly. Maybe more options actually would be more accurate, but I never take tests like that because they're just too long and require to much thought.

A lot of that is involved in the visual design. It's important to reduce eye movement, for me at least, because having to jump around the page slows down my thoughts. You might get away with four options if they were in a tight vertical configuration.

Good:
a)
b)
c)
d)

Bad:
a) b)
c) d)

[dissonance]

"When making decisions I
don't consider the feelings of others
consider the feelings of others"

"Talking about feelings and emotions is
difficult
easy"

these questions are both scored wrong on this site.

"don't consider the feelings of others " scores as F
"difficult" scores as F also

look at the page source, it's pretty easily decipherable.

seriously, though, why would they score these questions this way...

am i missing something?

(pay attention to me!!!!!)

[Kathara]

INTP - The "Engineer"
Temperament: NT (Intellectual)

Primary Function: Introverted Thinking
Population: 2.5% (4% male, 1% female)


Extraverted 16%
Introverted 84%

Sensing 5%
Intuition 95%

Thinking 89%
Feeling 11%

Judging 16%
Perceiving 84%

I took one professional test a couple of years ago. I tested very strongly on NT (over 90%), and more flexible in I/P (60-70ish). This test isnt too good, for I think I have worked on my E side in these past years.


Logical/Mathematical 100%
Verbal/Linguistic 95%
Visual/Spatial 75%
Intrapersonal 75%
Bodily/Kinesthetic 70%
Naturalist 60%
Musical 55%
Interpersonal 35%

[AliciaS2R]

I'v been to the site and I like it.


http://www.mypersonality.info/images/clear.gif
(http://alicias2r.mypersonality.info/)http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/4/40953.png?r=zvhczs (http://alicias2r.mypersonality.info/)
(http://alicias2r.mypersonality.info/)
(http://alicias2r.mypersonality.info/)

[Acala1]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/4/42641.png?r=zv7bgl

...

[kuraiken]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/4/42890.png

Nice website..

[Lout]

Boo-ya:

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/4/42921.png

[Methofelis]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/4/43394.png (http://methofelis.mypersonality.info)

Yee-haw. I likes me some treez.

[Lobo]

This is my new favorite personality tester on the internet. Nice work.http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/4/44157.png

[Ashi, K?]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/4/44162.png (http://doppel.mypersonality.info)

ESFJ - 0%/5%/11%/5%

I hate Methofelis' treez.

[ApeTheDog]

http://badges.mypersonality.info/badge/0/4/44168.png (http://apethedog.mypersonality.info)

[Lout]

I hate Methofelis' treez.

I loathe them. I got a 5% on naturalist.
I kid you not.

[Ohdear]

siggeh

[MacGuffin]

siggeh

Nope.

[Lobo]

After playing with the site a bit-

Something nice to add would be the ability to have multiple tests & results per account. The grouping thing is cool, but it's kind of a pain in the ass to have to create an account for each person if say, I have family over or friends who'll probably never check it again.

I'll be administering this to quite a few people in the next new months and I'll probably just overwrite my results to get around the annoyance of account creation.

On a related note- I'd also be cool if you could add a sort of graph feature that would allow someone to track their retake results over time.