PDA

View Full Version : An Alternative to Fractional Reserve Banking



Battlecry
2 Jun 2008, 05:36 AM
This is a basic proposal I have for an alternative to the current system of banking we have adopted on a global scale, fractional reserve banking. It's very brief and might have a few inconsistencies, but I still consider it draft material as I've only started to become knowledgeable on the subject of finance rather recently.

The Fractional Reserve Banking System consists of a central bank and numerous regional private banks. The private banks operate as businesses; they gain their revenue by charging interest for loans and other services. The private banks are able to create money by issuing credit, money that does not physically exist in the banks reserves, and issue it out to lenders at interest. Because of this, inflation and debt is perpetually increasing. Even the Federal government is charged interest on its own money that it lends, which is why the national debt of the United States is constantly rising. The irrationality of it is that the government is charged interest for using the money it created. The reason the system functions this way is because there are business interests, private individuals who make a profit off of the interest charged.

The system I propose would solve the issue of perpetually rising debt and the excessive control a few individuals who own the major financial institutions wield over society.

The proposal consists of direct government control over the production and distribution of currency, with a central bank and regional government banks that provide services to citizens such as holding valuables without cost and providing fiat loan services at low interest. (By fiat currency, I am referring to government-created money that physically exists) The excess revenue the government banks generate through charging low interest rates would be used as a method of public finance. Only the government would have the authority to create money, and could only lend existing, fiat currency; that is, the government could not create money through issuing credit that does not exist. The interest rates would be subject to a loan market, because the government would not simply be able to issue out nonexistent credit to everyone who demanded such. If demand for loans increases, interest rates would rise accordingly.
The government would not accumulate huge national debts because it would not need to borrow its own money at interest. This would naturally entail the elimination of private banks and the current Federal Reserve System.

Digitalization of Currency

With the establishment of the government banking system, currency would be digitalized and cards issued out to citizens by the government banks. The advantages of digitalization would be better centralization and security of financial assets. The user would be able to place as much money on a single card as he or she desires. Unlike a credit card, there would be no additional costs associated with using the card with transactions being immediate. In the case of fraud or the card being stolen, the government banks would be able to immediately cancel the card and re-issue the money lost to the user, perhaps this being the only instance when the bank would be allowed to issue out credit that does not exist if the bank has very limited assets in reserve. To encourage personal responsibility and discourage carefree handling of the card, a small fee will be charged for restoring financial assets lost due to fraud or the card being stolen.


"The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest." ? Abraham Lincoln

immortalmack
4 Jun 2008, 10:29 PM
Government printing it's own money would lead to increased corruption by elected officials, manipulation and loss of public trust. In the event of something like the present market we have now, the temptation to cut corners to get the economy back to growth status would be irrestible thereby losing control of the econmic system itself, not to mention the ability to effect the world trade system itself.

TryIt
5 Jun 2008, 11:48 PM
Well, you're certainly not the first one to take a crack at this.

http://www.perfecteconomy.com

You're on the right track with eliminating the fractional reserve banking system. Through this system, the banks have a license to print money and earn interest off of it. It's quite a scam, and I hope their greed will lead to their demise. Of course, they will continue to make the taxpayers bail them out, as long as we let them. The Fed banking system privatizes gains and socializes the losses.

Battlecry:
With the establishment of the government banking system, currency would be digitalized and cards issued out to citizens by the government banks. The advantages of digitalization would be better centralization and security of financial assets.

Yes, put all of my money on the card, controlled by the government. Because government is responsible, efficient, and effective in all things. Therefore, I trust thee, great government, with my hard earned money. Hey, why don't we put the money on a little chip, and implant in my body, that way I won't lose it. It's for my own good really. And gee, since all of my money is on the government issued card, the government can just take my taxes out without me even asking. How convenient for me!

Sorry, I'm not a slave and I don't plan on signing up for your card or the chip. I despise the Federal Reserve, but I don't trust this government with my money either. The US government, in conjunction with the Fed, has done nothing to earn my trust as a money manager, and much to violate it. Eliminate the Fed, and dramatically reform government to make it smaller and more efficient, and maybe then we can talk about issuing a currency.

Paper money used to represent a store of value, as a receipt, but then we got so accustomed to using the paper receipts that we thought the paper itself was somehow valuable. We simply proclaim that "This is a dollar. It is legal tender." Fiat currency was then born, but it only lives so long as the faith in it, and that faith is dying rapidly.

Lateralus
6 Jun 2008, 09:40 PM
The Fractional Reserve Banking System consists of a central bank and numerous regional private banks. The private banks operate as businesses; they gain their revenue by charging interest for loans and other services. The private banks are able to create money by issuing credit, money that does not physically exist in the banks reserves, and issue it out to lenders at interest. Because of this, inflation and debt is perpetually increasing. Even the Federal government is charged interest on its own money that it lends, which is why the national debt of the United States is constantly rising. The irrationality of it is that the government is charged interest for using the money it created. The reason the system functions this way is because there are business interests, private individuals who make a profit off of the interest charged.
To be more accurate, fractional reserve banking does not require a central bank. It's merely the act of a bank lending out more money than it physically has on hand (reserves). The bank is taking a risk that all the depositors won't demand their money at the same time. The lower the reserve requirement, the more profit the bank can make, but it's also in a riskier financial position. Without fractional reserves, banks would have to charge in order to profit, just like every other industry.


The proposal consists of direct government control over the production and distribution of currency, with a central bank and regional government banks that provide services to citizens such as holding valuables without cost and providing fiat loan services at low interest. (By fiat currency, I am referring to government-created money that physically exists) The excess revenue the government banks generate through charging low interest rates would be used as a method of public finance. Only the government would have the authority to create money, and could only lend existing, fiat currency; that is, the government could not create money through issuing credit that does not exist. The interest rates would be subject to a loan market, because the government would not simply be able to issue out nonexistent credit to everyone who demanded such. If demand for loans increases, interest rates would rise accordingly.
By removing profit motive, these banks are destined to become inefficient. Profit encourages efficiency.


The government would not accumulate huge national debts because it would not need to borrow its own money at interest. This would naturally entail the elimination of private banks and the current Federal Reserve System.
The printing of money is not the fundamental problem. The problem is government spending. Printing money is just a tactic (as old as taxes themselves), an indirect tax that was never voted on.


With the establishment of the government banking system, currency would be digitalized and cards issued out to citizens by the government banks. The advantages of digitalization would be better centralization and security of financial assets. The user would be able to place as much money on a single card as he or she desires. Unlike a credit card, there would be no additional costs associated with using the card with transactions being immediate. In the case of fraud or the card being stolen, the government banks would be able to immediately cancel the card and re-issue the money lost to the user, perhaps this being the only instance when the bank would be allowed to issue out credit that does not exist if the bank has very limited assets in reserve. To encourage personal responsibility and discourage carefree handling of the card, a small fee will be charged for restoring financial assets lost due to fraud or the card being stolen.

"The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credits needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest." ? Abraham Lincoln
This would be a horrible idea. Credit card companies have motivation to keep customers happy...the customer can switch to a different company. The government would have no such looming threat. This would become an inefficient bureaucracy. No one would be satisfied, except for the bureaucrats with their guaranteed employment/benefits/retirement.

dissident
25 Jun 2008, 03:35 AM
fractional reserving has the side effect of concentrating wealth in the hands of the top through the use of compound interest. The money can't help but go to those who have it and are able to loan it or otherwise profit off of it at interest.

Also it has the added side effect, since the entire currency is made up of debt, with debt being used as collateral to issue new debt, of having a hyperinflating debt supply and needing to sustain the upward accelleration of the hyperinflation to maintain the system.

As can be seen by this chart, the system is near maximum potential

http://img32.picoodle.com/img/img32/4/6/24/f_fdebtgdpxf3m_2537128.gifhttp://bp1.blogger.com/_dtY0VOFMWMM/SFHjob3NyvI/AAAAAAAAA4g/JCv95jUzgPc/s400/gradviolent.gif

The federal reserve's own stats show the outstanding debt increasing 20 trillion dollars since 2001, from 29 trillion to 49 trillion.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/RELEASES/z1/current/accessible/l1.htm


See this blog
http://hypertiger.blogspot.com/

socrateez
28 Jun 2008, 02:25 AM
Nice links dissident!
Money as Debt Great explanation of the world economy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVkFb26u9g8