Socionics Test

[jason_m]

http://www.mizami.nl/public_html/questionnaire

Note:

ILI = INTp
IEI = INFp
LII = INTj
EII = INFj
ILE = ENTp
IEE = ENFp
LIE = ENTj
EIE= ENFj
SLI = ISTp
SEI = ISFp
LSI = ISTj
ESI = ISFj
SLE = ESTp
SEE = ESFp
LSE = ESTj
ESE = ESFj

My results:

ILI Your result

IEI These types might also be considered
ILE
LII

IEE These types are not very likely
EII
LIE
EIE

SLI These types are quite unlikely
SEI
SLE
LSI

SEE these types are extremely unlikely
ESI
LSE
ESE

Jason

[Fingers]

ILE - Your result

Yeah ENTP sounds about right.

[Dark Razor]

Damn, that was long.

Test results
Your result
LII

These types might also be considered
LIE
EII
ILI

These types are not very likely
LSI
EIE
ILE
LSE

These types are quite unlikely
IEI
ESI
SLI
IEE

these types are extremely unlikely
ESE
SLE
SEI
SEE

[Negative_]

ILE Your result

These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI
SLE

These types are not very likely
LIE
IEI
SEE
SLI

These types are quite unlikely
EIE
LII
LSE
SEI

these types are extremely unlikely
EII
ESE
LSI
ESI

[Dark Razor]

Actually after reading the Quadra descriptions (http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Alpha_Quadra) I don't think that I could be a LII, since I don't identify very much with the Alpha Quadra descriptions. I better identify with the Gamma Quadra description (http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Gamma), and also the description of the LIE type description (http://wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=LIE)(ENTj), which also came second highest on my results.

I find the LII description gives the impression of a very cerebral person who mostly lives in their head, while I am certainly more of a "hands-on" person than that.

[Snail]

questionnaire
Test results
IEI Your result
IEE These types might also be considered
SEI
EII
SEE These types are not very likely
EIE
ILI
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
ESE
SLI
LII
SLE these types are extremely unlikely
LIE
LSI
LSE

[welshlass]

Your result:-
ILI

Types considered:-
IEI
LII
EII

Not very likely:-
ILE
SLI
IEE
LIE

Quite unlikely
SEI
LSI
EIE
ESI

Extremely unlikely
SLE
SEE
LSE
ESE

[Nunki]

Your result:
ILI = INTp

These types might also be considered:
LII = INTj
ILE = INFp
IEI = ENTp

These types are not very likely:
LIE
EII
IEE
EIE

These types are quite unlikely:
SLI
LSI
SLE
SEI

These types are extremely unlikely:
LSE
ESI
SEE
ESE

[bottle]

Test results
ILI Your result

ILE These types might also be considered
LII
IEI

SLI These types are not very likely
LIE
IEE
EII

SLE These types are quite unlikely
LSI
SEI
EIE

LSE these types are extremely unlikely
SEE
ESI
ESE

[doob]

questionnaire Test results

Your result
ILE (ENTP)

These types might also be considered
ILI (INTP)
IEE (ENFP)
SLE (ESTP)

These types are not very likely
IEI (INFP)
SLI (ISTP)
SEE (ESFP)
LIE (ENTJ)

These types are quite unlikely
SEI (ISFP)
LII (INTJ)
EIE (ENFJ)
LSE (ESTJ)

These types are extremely unlikely
EII (INFJ)
LSI (ISTJ)
ESE (ESFJ)
ESI (ISFJ)

[manza]

ILI (INTp) Your result

ILE (ENTp) These types might also be considered
IEI (INFp)
IEE (ENFp)

[p0psicle]

Your result SLI (ISTP)

These types might also be considered
ILI (INTP)
LSI (ISTJ)
LII (INTJ)

Hmm that's odd

[Uberfuhrer]

My result:
ILE (ENTp)

These types might also be considered:
ILI (INTp)
IEI (INFp)
LII (INTj)

These types are not very likely:
IEE (ENFp)
LIE (ENTj)
EII (INFj)
EIE (ENFj)

These types are quite unlikely:
SLI (ISTp)
SLE (ESTp)
SEI (ISFp)
LSI (ISTj)

These types are extremely unlikely:
SEE (ESFp)
LSE (ESTj)
ESI (ISFj)
ESE (ESFj)

[alienhated]

Test results

ILI Your result

ILE These types might also be considered
IEI
LII

SLI These types are not very likely
IEE
LIE
EII

SLE These types are quite unlikely
SEI
LSI
EIE

SEE these types are extremely unlikely
LSE
ESI
ESE

but ILI is INTP or INTp?

[YHWH]

ILE Your result

ILI These types might also be considered
IEE
IEI

LIE These types are not very likely
LII
EIE
EII

SLE These types are quite unlikely
SLI
SEE
SEI

LSE these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
ESE
ESI

A huge test for an inaccurate result.

[PlasticFish]

The test incorrectly identified me as an INFP, I think due to all the questions about being "good at" identifying and manipulating other peoples' emotions.

I'm good at it because I was taught and I practiced. That doesn't mean it's something I particularly enjoy doing.

[Levitas]

ILI Your result

ILE These types might also be considered
LII
LIE

IEI These types are not very likely
IEE
SLI
SLE

EII These types are quite unlikely
EIE
LSI
LSE

SEI these types are extremely unlikely
SEE
ESI
ESE

that was way too long lol

[Vildechaya]

This test gets an A+ from me!
In my endless quest for discovery of self and knowlege the human mind of in general ,I take a ton of tests. Some are horribly biased, some are acurate but don't serve much purpose , and some are extremely useful like this one.

The test itself was rather long and tedious and I was worried that there would be an annoying request for a cell phone number or to "register" with credit card information at the end. (don't you HATE that?) But no, this test is legit.

My results are very accurate -I always come out as an "ILI" as always.
I like the 'types to be considered' aspect of the test as well. I can see traits of these types as part of myself that I can relate to and am working on further developing.
And I relate to them in pretty much the exact order they are listed.

Now for some sick "typist stone-throwing"
The funny part of the test is way down the bottom of the list- at the end of "extremely unlikely" is ESE (ESFj)
Every type appears on the list, in the order of likelyhood, but somehow I am still vexed that this type appears on my list at all.
It is so far down, the very last item, couldn't it have been left out?
This is definity a personal problem.
I will have to examine this further....




ILI Your result (INTp)

These types may be considered
ILE (ENTp)
IEI (INFp)
IEE (ENFp)

SLI These types are not very likely
SLE
LII
LIE

SEI These types are quite unlikely
SEE
EII
EIE
LSI these types are extremely unlikely
LSE
ESI
ESE


Below is the key.






ILI = INTp
IEI = INFp
LII = INTj
EII = INFj
ILE = ENTp
IEE = ENFp
LIE = ENTj
EIE= ENFj
SLI = ISTp
SEI = ISFp
LSI = ISTj
ESI = ISFj
SLE = ESTp
SEE = ESFp
LSE = ESTj
ESE = ESFj

[pathetically-lovely]

Test results
ILI Your result
These types might also be considered
ILE
IEI
IEE
These types are not very likely
SLI
SLE
LII
LIE
These types are quite unlikely
SEI
SEE
EII
EIE
these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
LSE
ESI
ESE

[kali]

Your result
ILI

These types might also be considered
IEI
ILE
LII

These types are not very likely
SLI
IEE
EII
LIE

These types are quite unlikely
SEI
SLE
LSI
EIE

These types are extremely unlikely
SEE
ESI
LSE
ESE

[~Aquaman~]

SEE-esfp Your result

SLE-estp These types might also be considered
IEE-enfp
ILI-intp

IEI-infp These types are not very likely
SEI-isfp
SLI-istp
ILE-entp

ESI-isfj These types are quite unlikely
LSE-estj
EIE-enfj
ESE-esfj

LII-intj these types are extremely unlikely
LSI-istj
EII-infj
LIE-entj

Holy mc shit-fuck! This test is more confused that I am!!! I was expecting some sort of clarity, but instead it tells me I'm a friggin ESFP! :shock: . It's quite likely that I'm an EXXP of some sorts. I'll take this test again I think.

I have brought about much shame and dishonor... esfp... I may as well be a condom dispenser... I will now commit seppuku in the hopes of satisfying the samurai god, lord Pippi-Ribbitaka. Let me burn and smolder in the deep sharp depths of davey jones' locker.

[~Aquaman~]

2nd attempt:
Exactly the same... I wonder if it's the test or just me? I'm 100% certain that I am a sensotard, I miss details, forget what I was doing and suddenly end up standing there wondering wtf I was supposed to be doing. I don't learn my lesson very quickly, I've proven that, Si is a judgment function anyway. I'm frequently missing details, I run around wondering where the thing I'm looking for is for ages, then someone tells me that it's right where I was completely sure I've checked.

I know that I'm not an ESTp, I know what they're like. I'm satified with simply knowing how to make gunpower, ESTPs have the desire to go and make the gunpowder. Not ESFp, they are out there, confident and overconfident in their intellect (reminds me of Zinc).

ENFp is interesting, especially since ENTp is so far down on the list. That might mean that I actually use Fi? ESFp above ESTp suggests this as well. Oddly enough, I can actually relate surprisingly well to the ENFp profile, there were a few things that I don't agree with though, or aren't as strong within me as it says they should be...

[Chloe]

questionnaire
Test results
IEE Your result
ILE These types might also be considered
EIE
SEE
IEI These types are not very likely
LIE
SLE
ILI
ESE These types are quite unlikely
EII
SEI
LSE
LII

[Chloe]

...

You are over analyzing this about your type, and its making you more and more confused. Try take step back, stay away from any thinking/reading about it for 2 weeks, then try again.

[~Aquaman~]

You are over analyzing this about your type, and its making you more and more confused. Try take step back, stay away from any thinking/reading about it for 2 weeks, then try again.

haha, good plan, I'm enjoying reading up on ENFP versus ENTP though, but I think I'm more ENTP than ENFP... their similarities have just been brought to my attention a bit more. It's quite an interesting result though, I should go to bed instead of stewing over it :grin:

[Chaselation]

Holy mc shit-fuck! This test is more confused that I am!!! I was expecting some sort of clarity, but instead it tells me I'm a friggin ESFP! :shock: . It's quite likely that I'm an EXXP of some sorts. I'll take this test again I think.

I have brought about much shame and dishonor... esfp... I may as well be a condom dispenser... I will now commit seppuku in the hopes of satisfying the samurai god, lord Pippi-Ribbitaka. Let me burn and smolder in the deep sharp depths of davey jones' locker.

I don't know any ESFPs who would have a clue what you just wrote there. Clearly you are not.

Take Chloe's advice, you seem to be drilling yourself into a hole.




ILI Your result
ILE These types might also be considered
IEI
IEE
LII These types are not very likely
SLI
LIE
SLE
EII These types are quite unlikely
SEI
EIE
SEE
LSI these types are extremely unlikely
LSE
ESI
ESE

[~Aquaman~]

I'm trying, but I really really really want to know... or maybe I just don't want to go to bed? I can't just forget it all though, I have to pursue it! :puppy:

Bah! I'll just entice myself into sleep with forceful delusions or something. But that never works out right.

[INA]

The last 2 times I did this I got LII

Test results
Your result
ILI

These types might also be considered
ILE
LII
LIE

These types are not very likely
SLI
SLE
IEI
LSI

These types are quite unlikely
IEE
LSE
EII
EIE

these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
SEE
ESI
ESE

[Technical]

Learn one, do one, teach one, Chloe. lol.

["?"]

Test results

ILI Your result

SLI These types might also be considered
ILE
SLE

IEI These types are not very likely
SEI
IEE
SEE

LII These types are quite unlikely
LSI
LIE
LSE

EII these types are extremely unlikely
ESI
EIE
ESE

[stigmatica]

Awesome! Finally a test that gives me my E and F :banana:

Your result
IEE - ENFP

These types might also be considered
ILE - ENTP
IEI - INFP
SEE - ESFP

These types are not very likely
EIE - ENFJ
ILI - INTP
SLE - ESTP
LIE - ENTJ

These types are quite unlikely
SEI - ISFP
EII - INFJ
ESE - ESFJ
SLI - ISTP

these types are extremely unlikely
LII - INTJ
LSE - ESTJ
ESI - ISFJ
LSI - ISTJ

[pan_sonic_000]

Awesome! Finally a test that gives me my E and F :banana:

Your result
IEE - ENFP


Somehow, that makes sense for you.

You don't strike me as particularly INTP, but I'm not sure if I could say why (yet). There just seems to be something jovial, warm and loveable about you.

[stigmatica]

Somehow, that makes sense for you.

You don't strike me as particularly INTP, but I'm not sure if I could say why (yet). There just seems to be something jovial, warm and loveable about you.

I've been told that by two people now... Hmmm :think:

I may post a debate thread if my typing doubts continue... I admit I'm considering it, anyway.

EDIT:
FYI - My Debate Thread got Posted (http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=35686)

[overainbows]

ILI Your result

[teleforce]

ILE (ENTp) - Your result

ILI (INTp) - These types might also be considered
IEE (ENFp)
IEI (INFp)

[cripple]

ILE Your result

ILI These types might also be considered
IEE
LIE

IEI These types are not very likely
LII
SLE
EIE

SLI These types are quite unlikely
EII
SEE
LSE

SEI these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
ESE
ESI

[jyng1]

ILI Your result
ILE These types might also be considered
LII
LIE
IEI These types are not very likely
SLI
IEE
SLE
EII These types are quite unlikely
LSI
EIE
LSE
SEI these types are extremely unlikely
SEE
ESI
ESE

ILI = INTp
IEI = INFp
LII = INTj
EII = INFj
ILE = ENTp
IEE = ENFp
LIE = ENTj
EIE= ENFj
SLI = ISTp
SEI = ISFp
LSI = ISTj
ESI = ISFj
SLE = ESTp
SEE = ESFp
LSE = ESTj
ESE = ESFj

[Lolo]

Test results
ILE Your result
ILI These types might also be considered
IEE
IEI
LIE These types are not very likely
LII
SLE
SLI
EIE These types are quite unlikely
EII
SEE
SEI
LSE these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
ESE
ESI

I didnt like this test at all, too long, too detailed, asking me EXACTLY what i was like so it could tell me EXACTLY what i was like. DUH.

[Etherealsage]

Test results
IEE = ENFp Your result
IEI = INFp These types might also be considered
EIE= ENFj
EII = INFj
SEE = ESFp These types are not very likely
SEI = ISFp
ESE = ESFj
ESI = ISFj
ILE = ENTp These types are quite unlikely
ILI = INTp
LIE = ENTj
LII = INTj
SLE = ESTp these types are extremely unlikely
SLI = ISTp
LSE = ESTj
LSI = ISTj

Well now, this is a shocker. I usually mistype as an on E/I and often on F/T. Heh, I like this one.

[Resonance]

I got ILI as well but this supposedly maps to the MBTI INTJ? I'm a lil' confused now.

[Technical]

I got ILI as well but this supposedly maps to the MBTI INTJ? I'm a lil' confused now.

It's a long story, but fundamentally, MBTI and Socionics have opposed theories on introverts' functions. I happen to think Socionics makes much more sense (I also happen to think that the function system I created makes still more sense).

For the record though, They don't ever map properly. ILI=Ni-Te-Si-Fe. INTJ=Ni-Te-Fi-Se.

INTP=ILI.

[Resonance]

It's a long story, but fundamentally, MBTI and Socionics have opposed theories on introverts' functions. I happen to think Socionics makes much more sense (I also happen to think that the function system I created makes still more sense).

For the record though, They don't ever map properly. ILI=Ni-Te-Si-Fe. INTJ=Ni-Te-Fi-Se.

INTP=ILI.
Oh, so it's like one of those math spaces where A*B=-AB

...

Guess I'd better read more.

[Technical]

Oh, so it's like one of those math spaces where A*B=-AB

...

Guess I'd better read more.

Don't read too much, it's all a bunch of crap. :D

[Resonance]

Don't read too much, it's all a bunch of crap. :D
I'll read on the toilet, then.

[ciphersort]

Your result

ILI INTp

Consider these

SLI ISTp (perhaps)
ILE ENTp (not likely)
IEI INFp (haha... not a romantic in any way shape or form)

[ciphersort]

Awesome! Finally a test that gives me my E and F :banana:

Your result
IEE - ENFP


Oh how did I miss this. :)

Do you find you have Illusionary Relations (http://www.socionics.com/rel/ill.htm) with INTps?

[ciphersort]

It's a long story, but fundamentally, MBTI and Socionics have opposed theories on introverts' functions. I happen to think Socionics makes much more sense (I also happen to think that the function system I created makes still more sense).

For the record though, They don't ever map properly. ILI=Ni-Te-Si-Fe. INTJ=Ni-Te-Fi-Se.

INTP=ILI.

How do you feel about the physical typing in Socionics? Does function follow form in that system... is it function+form=type... or what?

[Technical]

How do you feel about the physical typing in Socionics? Does function follow form in that system... is it function+form=type... or what?

I'm a proponent of visual identification. I've actually been compiling photos of those who are probably whatever type, I'll send you a link.

As to the reason why people could be typed by looking at their faces, that's tough. As far as I know, there is a complete lack of scientific research on the subject, but I would imagine genetics are involved, as in whatever makes you identify as INTP would also make you appear INTP. (Although I'm familiar with cases where genetic identity has not resulted in type identity, by all accounts, which means there must be more involved.)

I think that habitual facial expressions are a factor, but there really seem to be other factors at work...Which seemingly couldn't be affected by behavior.

[Resonance]

I'm a proponent of visual identification. I've actually been compiling photos of those who are probably whatever type, I'll send you a link.

As to the reason why people could be typed by looking at their faces, that's tough. As far as I know, there is a complete lack of scientific research on the subject, but I would imagine genetics are involved, as in whatever makes you identify as INTP would also make you appear INTP. (Although I'm familiar with cases where genetic identity has not resulted in type identity, by all accounts, which means there must be more involved.)

I think that habitual facial expressions are a factor, but there really seem to be other factors at work...Which seemingly couldn't be affected by behavior.
Well, there is some evidence that the introversion-extroversion axis is influenced by brain blood pressure, isn't there?

And repression/expression of emotions would definitely influence different hormone levels.

[Technical]

Well, there is some evidence that the introversion-extroversion axis is influenced by brain blood pressure, isn't there?

And repression/expression of emotions would definitely influence different hormone levels.

I don't recall the specifics, but yes, I have read from various sources that there are biological brain differences between Is and Es, using whatever standards they did.

I could google for it, but then so could someone else....

[Gewitter27]

Test results

ILI Your result

ILE These types might also be considered
LII
IEI

LIE These types are not very likely
IEE
SLI
SLE

EII These types are quite unlikely
EIE
LSI
SEI

LSE these types are extremely unlikely
SEE
ESI
ESE

[defragmybrain]

SEE Your result
ESE These types might also be considered
SLE
SEI
IEE These types are not very likely
LSE
ESI
EIE
SLI These types are quite unlikely
ILE
IEI
LSI
LIE these types are extremely unlikely
EII
ILI
LII


no surprises here.

[demagogic_schizoid]

Interesting descriptions on the wikisocion page :mellow:

[rhinosaur]

SLI Your result

LSI These types might also be considered
SLE
LSE

ILI These types are not very likely
ILE
LII
SEI

LIE These types are quite unlikely
SEE
ESI
ESE

IEI these types are extremely unlikely
IEE
EII
EIE

[Trentham]

Interesting...


Your result
ILI - INTp

These types might also be considered
ILE - ENTp
IEI - INFp
IEE - ENFp

These types are not very likely
LIE - ENTj
EII - INFj
SLI - ISTp

These types are quite unlikely
EIE - ENFj
SLE - ESTp
SEI - ISFp
SEE - ESFp

these types are extremely unlikely
LSI - ISTj
LSE - ESTj
ESI - ISFj
ESE - ESFj

[dubbeltop]

SLI Your result

ILI These types might also be considered
SEI
IEI

A bit of everything....

[Eric]

Right on the money, including the next closest three that I'm most similar to.:happpy:


Your result
EII (INFJ)

These types might also be considered
LII (INTJ)
EIE (ENFJ)
IEI (INFP)

These types are not very likely
ESI (ISFJ)
LIE (ENTJ)
ILI (INTP)
IEE (ENFP)

These types are quite unlikely
LSI (ISTJ)
ESE (ESFJ)
SEI (ISFP)
ILE (ENTP)

these types are extremely unlikely
LSE (ESTJ)
SLI (ISTP)
SEE (ESFP)
SLE (ESTP)

[turquoise]

ILI (INTp)
Your result

ILE (ENTp) These types might also be considered
IEI (INFp)
IEE (ENFp)
SLI These types are not very likely
SLE
SEI
SEE
LII These types are quite unlikely
LIE
EII
EIE
LSI these types are extremely unlikely
LSE
ESI
ESE

[stuck]

ILE

weird

[Technical]

NOT THAT WEIRD

[stuck]

NOT THAT WEIRD

I test at 70% introverted and identify with being introverted. To be honest I'd rather be an ENTP, seems like I'd have a better chance in life. t(*.*)t

[Technical]

I've thought the man in your avatar looked ENTP.

[Mickehh]

Damn that was long.

INTJ wasn't a surprise, I've tested as it a couple of times before, but this was the first time I get anything that even remotely suggests to dominant feeling (INFJ). Interesting.

Your Result
LII (INTJ)

These types might also be considered
EII (INFJ)
ILI (INTP)
IEI (INFP)

These types are not very likely
LSI (ISTJ)
ESI (ISFJ)
LIE (ENTJ)
SLI (ISTP)

These types are quite unlikely
EIE (ENFJ)
SEI (ISFP)
ILE (ENTP)
IEE (ENFP)

these types are extremely unlikely
LSE (ESTJ)
ESE (ESFJ)
SLE (ESTP)
SEE (ESFP)

[depp]

ILI (INTP) Your result

IEI (INFP) These types might also be considered
ILE (ENTP)
IEE (ENFP)

LII (INTJ) These types are not very likely
EII (INFJ)
LIE (ENTJ)
EIE (ENFJ)

SLI (ISTP) These types are quite unlikely
SEI (ISFP)
SLE (ESTP)
SEE (ESFP)

LSI (ISTJ) these types are extremely unlikely
ESI (ISFJ)
LSE (ESTJ)
ESE (ESFJ)

[rhuarch]

Your result
ILI

These types might also be considered
ILE
IEI
IEE

These types are not very likely
LII
SLI
LIE
SLE

These types are quite unlikely
EII
SEI
EIE
SEE

these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
LSE
ESI
ESE

[UniversalMagnetism]

Wow, nice test. I thought the questions were pretty good. The results make a lot of sense to me.

INTP ILI Your result

INFP IEI These types might also be considered
ENTP ILE
INTJ LII

This goes with my confusion of INXX minus the INFJ. UM approves this thread.

http://i222.photobucket.com/albums/dd12/potatopopper/Me-1.gif

[katie morosky]

I tested ILE (entp, wich is not so strange since I'm 40% extrovert and 60% introvert)

My result:

Test results
ILE (entp) Your result
SLE (estp) These types might also be considered
IEE (enfp)
SEE (esfp)
LIE (entj) These types are not very likely
LSE (estj)
EIE (enfj)
ILI (intp)
ESE (esfj) These types are quite unlikely
SLI (istp)
IEI (infp)
SEI (isfp)
LII (intj) these types are extremely unlikely
LSI (istj)
EII (infj)
ESI (isfj)

[Raccoon Love]

EII(INFJ) Your result

IEI(INFP) These types might also be considered
LII(INTJ)
ILI(INTP)
EIE(ENFJ) These types are not very likely
IEE(ENFP)
LIE(ENTJ)
ILE(ENTP)
ESI(iSFJ) These types are quite unlikely
SEI(iSFP)
LSI(ISTJ)
SLI(ISTP)
ESE(ESFJ) these types are extremely unlikely
SEE(ESFP)
LSE(ESTJ)
SLE(ESTP)

[Senka]

Your result
ILE - ENTp

These types might also be considered
ILI - INTp
SLE - ESTp
IEE - ENFp

[noob]

ILI... although by now I already know how I'm going to answer since I've taken so many of these personality tests. I feel like I take it more to see how accurate the test is instead of how accurate I am.

[Chunes]

IEI (INFP) Your result
IEE (ENFP) These types might also be considered
ILI (INTP)
EII (INFJ)

[LastRailway]

Yet another test that tags me as E (ENTP or ESTP). I'm fairly sure I'm introverted, however, so I'll stick with INTP.

Your result
ILE (ENTp)

These types might also be considered
SLE (ESTp)
ILI (INTp)
LIE (ENTj)

These types are not very likely
SLI (ISTp)
IEE (ENFp)
LII (INTj)
LSE (ESTj)

These types are quite unlikely
IEI (INFp)
SEE (ESFp)
LSI (ISTj)
EIE (ENFj)

these types are extremely unlikely
SEI (ISFp)
EII (INFj)
ESE (ESFj)
ESI (ISFj)

[Senka]

Yet another test that tags me as E (ENTP or ESTP). I'm fairly sure I'm introverted, however, so I'll stick with INTP.

Socionics defines I/E differently, I used to be certain I was INTP until I looked at Socionics, this (http://www.socionics.us/theory/ext_int.shtml) made it pretty darn hard for me to claim introversion as I related quite strongly with the extroverted traits.

[LastRailway]

Socionics defines I/E differently, I used to be certain I was INTP until I looked at Socionics, this (http://www.socionics.us/theory/ext_int.shtml) made it pretty darn hard for me to claim introversion as I related quite strongly with the extroverted traits.

Huh. Thanks for this link. I still find that I have more introverted characteristics, but apparently my E/I axis is much more balanced than what I thought. Particularly in what they describe as physiology, emotions and strengths I'm definitively more an E than an I.

[cripple]

Socionics defines I/E differently, I used to be certain I was INTP until I looked at Socionics, this (http://www.socionics.us/theory/ext_int.shtml) made it pretty darn hard for me to claim introversion as I related quite strongly with the extroverted traits.
Interesting the objectivity/subjectivity divide. I wonder if this is not an arch characteristic. Makes me E as well.

I think the systems are not the same. I still stand by my opinion that ILE is more like INTP then ILI.

[Dooraven]

Your result
ILI

These types might also be considered
LII
IEI
SLI

These types are not very likely
EII
ILE
LSI
SEI

These types are quite unlikely
LIE
IEE
ESI
SLE

These types are extremely unlikely
EIE
LSE
SEE
ESE

[clarkhopes]

Socionics is a branch of psychology based on Carl Jung's work on psychological types, Sigmund Freud's theory of the conscious and subconscious and Antoni Kepinski's theory of Information Metabolism. Socionics was founded mainly by the Lithuanian researcher Aushra Augustinavichute in the 1970s and is now evolving rapidly. Socionics also shares much in common with the work of Myers and Briggs, however there are circumstances when Socionics and MBTI® theory differ in a few significant ways.

[porcupine]

Your result
ILI - INTP

These types might also be considered
ILE - ENTP
SLI - ISTP
IEI - INFP

[CreativeChaos]

IEE (ENFp) Your result
IEI (INFp) These types might also be considered
EIE (ENFJ)
ILE (ENTP)

Yeah...I seem to be sort of XNFP, but more I than E.

[Within]

Your result
LII

These types might also be considered
ILI
LSI
EII

These types are not very likely
SLI
LIE
IEI
ILE

These types are quite unlikely
ESI
LSE
SEI
EIE

these types are extremely unlikely
SLE
IEE
ESE
SEE

[Wolfe]

INTP Your result

ENTP
ISTP These types might also be considered
INTJ

ESTP
ENTJ These types are not very likely
INFJ
ISTJ

ENFP
ESTJ These types are quite unlikely
ISFP
INFJ

ESFP These types are extremely unlikely
ENFJ
ISFJ
ESFJ

[Wolfe]

ILI... although by now I already know how I'm going to answer since I've taken so many of these personality tests. I feel like I take it more to see how accurate the test is instead of how accurate I am.

lol.... what I have to start doing is not think about the test for like 3 weeks, an then pick it back up.

[YHWH]

Yup, still getting ENTp on this one.

These types might also be considered:

ENFp
INTp
INFp

These types are not very likely:

ENTj
ENFj
ESTp
ESFp

etc.

Lol, the E results are so overwhelming, makes no fucking sense.

[Resonance]

Well, to be fair, the stereotype of an extrovert is the ESFJ persona, so we've got 3 factors telling us we're introverts. We can't relate to average people (N), we don't get/value/whatever emotional connections with 'em (T), and we're relatively passive/value input more than output (P). These things add up with E to make you prefer engaging situations but have trouble making the social connections, so you either
A) find non-social ways to feed your need for stimulation
B) end up in fringey social groups with other misfits (usually predominantly introverted social groups)
C) get lucky and learn the skills to integrate with mainstream society in a way that doesn't piss you off
D) for lack of a better option, integrate with mainstream society and get pissed off a lot
E) depression and suicide
F) PUA
G) take up a performance art
H) sex
I) drugs
J) rock and roll

...you get the idea.

Correcting for this bias, I think there are quite a few closet extroverts on this forum.

[cripple]

Well, to be fair, the stereotype of an extrovert is the ESFJ persona, so we've got 3 factors telling us we're introverts. We can't relate to average people (N), we don't get/value/whatever emotional connections with 'em (T), and we're relatively passive/value input more than output (P). These things add up with E to make you prefer engaging situations but have trouble making the social connections, so you either
A) find non-social ways to feed your need for stimulation
B) end up in fringey social groups with other misfits (usually predominantly introverted social groups)
C) get lucky and learn the skills to integrate with mainstream society in a way that doesn't piss you off
D) for lack of a better option, integrate with mainstream society and get pissed off a lot
E) depression and suicide
F) PUA
G) take up a performance art
H) sex
I) drugs
J) rock and roll

...you get the idea.

Correcting for this bias, I think there are quite a few closet extroverts on this forum.
No comment, but an excellent analyses.

[Infinityvers]

ILE Your result (ENTp)

These types might also be considered
ILI INTp
IEE ENFp
IEI INFp

These types are not very likely
LIE
EIE
LII
EII

These types are quite unlikely
SLE
SEE
SLI
SEI

These types are extremely unlikely
LSE
ESE
LSI
ESI

[nirmohi]

ILI

and I think that's correct....*heck.. i am not going to take it again*

[Poui]

Your result
ILE

These types might also be considered
SLE
IEE
LIE

These types are not very likely
ILI
SEE
LSE
EIE

These types are quite unlikely
SLI
IEI
LII
ESE

these types are extremely unlikely
SEI
LSI
EII
ESI

... I call BS.

Or a need to actually study the Socionics types instead of just looking at the MBTI mappings.

Probably the latter.

[DoomBagel]

INTp

INFp
INTj
ENTp

What a surprise. Why am I even doing this? Fuck I am bored. And drunk.

[Yummy]

Test results
ILI Your result
ILE These types might also be considered
IEI
IEE


LIL=INTp INTJ or INTP Critic / Observer Balzac

[Digital Future]

Your result
INTp (ILI)

These types might also be considered
ENTp (ILE)
INTj (LII)
INFp (IEI)

These types are not very likely
ENTj (LIE)
ENFp (IEE)
INFj (EII)
ISTp (SLI)

These types are quite unlikely
ENFj (EIE)
ESTp (SLE)
ISTj (LSI)
ISFp (SEI)

These types are extremely unlikely
ESTj (LSE)
ESFp (SEE)
ISFj (ESI)
ESFj (ESE)