WHEN THIS WORLD BURNS.

[Shai Gar]

die, just fucking DIE.

none of you matter, you are just beings who are rare because you suck. the mold wasnt one that was unfortunately rare. THANK FUCKING LOKI IT WAS RARE.

just fucking die.

[ApeTheDog]

Here you go: some attention.

[Shai Gar]

FUCK OFF AND DIE.

[April]

You adorable, silly goose.

[file cabinet]

why are you so upset?

[flan2dave]

This was theraputic for the both of us.

[Shai Gar]

just let this thread die.

[Circe]

This particular thread was my introduction to this section of the forum ... ummm .... well, yes Shai Gar, everyone here (including yourself) will in due course fulfill this wish of yours. You can take this as a promise. :)

[Shai Gar]

i wanted this thread to die, not be your introduction to the forum. but welcome.

[melancholeric]

Hey Shai, why do you want this thread to die? This is highly amusing. Up to par with the rest of your threads.

[Architectonic]

Yes, this will certainly be one to mention at his wedding. ;)

[MacGuffin]

[Starting to wonder if Shai Gar isn't some attention whore Feeling type]

[Star]

This is a psychology forum. He's just providing us with great examples of anal expulsive behavior.

Thanks Shai Gar!

:cheers:

[snarled]

:eek:

[mgb]

I have a strong impulse not to let this thread die. Can't explain it...

[Edmond Zedo]

die, just fucking DIE.

none of you matter, you are just beings who are rare because you suck. the mold wasnt one that was unfortunately rare. THANK FUCKING LOKI IT WAS RARE.

just fucking die.
I'm not rare because I suck, you magnificent son of a bitch! *preserves post forever*

[C.J.Woolf]

I have a strong impulse not to let this thread die. Can't explain it...
I can. It's 'cause INTPs can't stand being told what to do.

Shai Gar's instant thread-death wish makes me think there ought to be a not-thread thread -- a thread of single rants to which no reply is expected. (See how long that lasts, heh.)

[misutii]

*bump*

[Division56]

*bump*

You bumped Shai's rump!


*bursts into giggles*

[Mariel]

Circe: love your signature.

[songbird36]

die, just fucking DIE.

none of you matter, you are just beings who are rare because you suck. the mold wasnt one that was unfortunately rare. THANK FUCKING LOKI IT WAS RARE.

just fucking die.

Aha - I can give this thread a rating now. I'll have to ponder on it for a bit.

SG once again you have outdone yourself in the intellectual acuity stakes. I am *truly* and deeply impressed...

[Shai Gar]

JUST LET IT DIE FOR FUCKS SAKE. i needed to rant and i did. rant needing over. SOMEONE DELETE THIS FUCKING THREAD. AND WHILE YOU ARE AT IT ALL OF MY THREADS WITH "FUCK" IN THE TITLE. goddamnit

[Claverhouse]

This is a thread the world will not willingly let die.



Claverhouse :ph34r:


[ The poster who reaches no. 500 might claim a small prize, from Shai anyway ]

[MacGuffin]

[ The poster who reaches no. 500 might claim a small prize, from Shai anyway ]
His virginity? No thanks.

[Division56]

His virginity? No thanks.

Don't be rude, I'm sure Shai would make a righteous bottom.

[melancholeric]

Now Jemma just has to register here. You want that too, don't you Shai?

[mgb]

You mean Jemma of Tannum Sands?

*here google spider, c'mon, here spider spider*

[Claverhouse]

His virginity? No thanks.
Suppose you were to awake to a knocking at dawn, and find a tiny joey staring at you from within a crate ? 'Dadda ! Dadda !'

Or the word FUCK beaten out in burning gold by Australia's finest artists to place above your front door ?

Or a framed Appreciation of America to place above your desk at work ?

The possibilities are as wide as the great Tasmanian Sea.



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[songbird36]

This is a thread the world will not willingly let die.



Claverhouse :ph34r:


[ The poster who reaches no. 500 might claim a small prize, from Shai anyway ]

You seem to be using it to up your trivial post count Claver..

:lol:

[Shai Gar]

there is a tasmanian sea?

i have heard of the tasman, the GAB and the pacific. not the tasmanian sea.

and the 500th poster in this thread gets death. so does the 32nd

[Shai Gar]

holy shit his post count is bigger than mine.. fuck that.

and if i ever write an Appreciation of America, somebody had better laminate it in wood and then seal it behind bullet proof glass. because it will be the rarest object on earth.

and i might actually pay quite a bit to get it back

[melancholeric]

mgbr's new signature rocks, by the way. You could change it to point to last post though. ( add "&goto=lastpost" )

[Geoff]

holy shit his post count is bigger than mine.. fuck that.

and if i ever write an Appreciation of America, somebody had better laminate it in wood and then seal it behind bullet proof glass. because it will be the rarest object on earth.

and i might actually pay quite a bit to get it back

And with a description of how to find it, because it will be such a small piece...

-Geoff

[mgb]

mgbr's new signature rocks, by the way. You could change it to point to last post though. ( add "&goto=lastpost" )

I have a better way to change it...what do you think?

[Shai Gar]

fucking fuck off brad. damnit. get that out of your signature and you EDM just let the thread die

[melancholeric]

Not bad. I'd still rather go directly to the last post. The conversation doesn't have anything to do with the opening post anyway. The last post is far more relevant if you're going to reply.

[Shai Gar]

do you guys WANT to be alt-f4'd

[mgb]

Sorry, I can't help it. I want this not be so funny and for me to lose my overwhelming desire to see this thread on the main page all the time, but I can't. I know, I am weak.

[mgb]

Not bad. I'd still rather go directly to the last post. The conversation doesn't have anything to do with the opening post anyway. The last post is far more relevant if you're going to reply.

You are right. Fixed.

[melancholeric]

Now, make sure you always have the last post in this thread. That's just postmodern.

A cyber-existential perpetual motion machine.

[mgb]

Now, make sure you always have the last post in this thread. That's just postmodern.

A cyber-existential perpetual motion machine.

I don't know what you mean.

[songbird36]

What is the sea between the Mainland and Tasmania called then?

The funny thing is SG when I saw this thread title I actually thought this was a *serious* thread..

lol

[melancholeric]

I don't know what you mean.
I mean that if I see a link I just have to click it.

Like this. (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82909&#post82909)

[mgb]

I mean that if I see a link I just have to click it.

Like this. (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82909&#post82909)

Doesn't the yellow period make everything seem a lot more postmodern.

[Claverhouse]

holy shit his post count is bigger than mine.. fuck that.

and if i ever write an Appreciation of America, somebody had better laminate it in wood and then seal it behind bullet proof glass. because it will be the rarest object on earth.

and i might actually pay quite a bit to get it back
Well, if it matters mine is since slightly after the Forum started, back in the good old days of long ago, whereas you've been here just over three months --- although it may seem longer: therefore if our post-counts are roughly equal you post four times as much as me.

Not that I take any notice of post-counts particularly. Some people post just 20 messages say, and they're good ones.

I'm sorry you never heard of the --- no doubt lovely --- Tasmanian Sea, because it means a lot to us in Britain; but there are plenty of places in GB I've never heard of, and have no wish to visit. Map Collection Code Projects (http://palmmtest.fcla.edu/map/mapfilters.html) ( hint, go to the Australasian sector ); Sir Francis Chichester (http://www.fumcbirmingham.org/sermons/morning/19980621.htm):


He was a really adventuresome kind of a spirit of a man, and he decided he wanted to do something no one else had ever done so he decided he'd be the first one to fly the Atlantic in a little plane. Well then Charles Lindbergh beat him to that so he started looking around the world for a new challenge. He looked to an area of the world that was so rocked by storms with a body of water that had never been crossed before, the Tasmanian Sea. He said, "I'm going to do that. I'm going to cross the Tasmanian Sea in a little airplane. Everyone said, "You can't do it." No one's ever come out on the other side. And he said, "I will do it." And so he set off. He set off in a little airplane that was pretty primitive. He only had two things in the airplane, it didn't even have a wheel, it had a stick back then. He had that stick to guide the airplane, the rudder of the plane, and then he had a sexton, not even a compass, he had a sexton. You know what that is. You position with the stars of the universe, all the other planet bodies and you know your direction by that. And he set off. He set off on a clear, beautiful day. Off he goes into the wild blue yonder in this little plane. Only the clouds came in and it began to get very rough and stormy and he was in total darkness. And if you've been in a little plane, not just a jetliner, where you're seeing that darkness all around you, it's a scary, scary proposition. He does a marvelous job of telling the terror of living in that and I found myself reading it saying, "Oh, my gosh, he's not going to make it." And then I realized the book is an autobiography so he had to make it.
Another lucid explanation here (http://www.eastsea.org/article3/report2-1.htm):

There are some rules regarding the names of internationally called seas with exceptions existing. One of them is to call the name of the sea by naming the country located in the west of the particular sea. The Yellow Sea is indicated as it is because it is the sea the Yellow River flowing into. The Sea in the east of Okhotsk City in Russia is called the Sea of Okhotsk, the sea in the west of Okinawa and east of China is called the East China Sea, the sea in the west of the Philippines and south of China is called the South China Sea, the sea in the east of Timor is called the Sea of Timor, the sea in the east of Tasmania located in the Southern Australia and between Australia and New Zealand is called the Tasmanian Sea, the sea in the east of the Arabian peninsula is the Arabian Sea, the sea in the east of Mexico is called the Mexico Bay, the sea in the east of the Labrador peninsula of Canada is the Sea of Labrador, the sea in the east of Mozambique of Africa is called the Sea of Mozambique, and the sea in the east of Andaman is called the Sea of Andaman.
And I didn't say a nice Appreciation. The word also has a secondary meaning of appraisal.



Claverhouse :ph34r:


The Road Goes Ever On.

[melancholeric]

That, and the existential agony induced by the cybernetic paradox of a self-referential link. I wonder what the google spider (http://www.cannabis.net/weblife.html) thinks of it.

[melancholeric]

Doesn't the yellow period make everything seem a lot more postmodern.
That, and the existential agony induced by the cybernetic paradox of a self-referential link. I wonder what kind of web (http://www.cannabis.net/weblife.html) the google spider makes with it.

Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83068#post83068).

[mgb]

That, and the existential agony induced by the cybernetic paradox of a self-referential link. I wonder what kind of web (http://www.cannabis.net/weblife.html) the google spider makes with it.

Speaking of the google spider...Jemma Tannum Sands...I think it's web is much more sinister, square, modern and imposing.

Yes google spider is the return to modernity. And we need to fight with self-referential links and yellow periods.

[Claverhouse]

What is the sea between the Mainland and Tasmania called then?

The funny thing is SG when I saw this thread title I actually thought this was a *serious* thread..

lol I didn't, because it lacked a certain word: but I did think that it was something to do with a very old post I once made quoting Frost's poem: which shows how egocentric even the greatest can be. Too human, all too human...

But, since I'm here, in the best traditions of the party bore I may as well repeat the poem, but without the illustration I chose, since the old Forumer threads have gone forever :cry::

Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I've tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[melancholeric]

But just think of those poor spiders who had to go through that experiment...

I think the google spider web will be somewhat similar to the LSD version, given the way it just refers to itself all the time. Particularly if it includes words like Jemma and Tannum and Sands. And Australia. Not to mention if the spider actually is on drugs.

It must be on caffeine, it couldn't work such long hours without some kind of stimulant.

And just for the hell of it.... (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82943#post82943)

[Division56]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jemma+tannum+sands&btnG=Google+Search

[songbird36]

I thought it was some sort of apocalyptic thread and it looked rather intriguing.

[mgb]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jemma+tannum+sands&btnG=Google+Search

Jemma wouldn't be happy with those numbers. Jemma needs more representation on google.

A gift for Melan. (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82949#post82949)

Let's hope for Jemma's sake that spider is caffine.

[melancholeric]

I'm going to do something original with this post...

It doesn't work. It links to the previous post.

As for spiders, there are some interesting questions about that experiment.

If the human doses of LSD are measured in micrograms, what about spider doses? How did they measure them?

If spiders get withdrawals, will they see humans crawling on their skin?

[Claverhouse]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jemma+tannum+sands&btnG=Google+Search That's very helpful; but future users should remember to click on the Shai Garian link(s) whilst there to keep them bumped up by the Google spider's cousins...

I went straight to Shai's profile and clicked on his homepage ! Which, being one of those I am unlikely to ever come across on the web, immediately sent me a downloadable* that I would have to be extremely stupid to accept.


Claverhouse :ph34r:


* gba1305.exe

[edit: a trojan apparently. Not SG's fault.]

[mgb]

I'm going to do something original with this post...

It doesn't work. It links to the previous post.

As for spiders, there are some interesting questions about that experiment.

If the human doses of LSD are measured in micrograms, what about spider doses? How did they measure them?

If spiders get withdrawals, will they see humans crawling on their skin?

I'd say the spiders see parasites. (http://www.esajournals.org/esaonline/?request=get-abstract&issn=0012-9658&volume=83&issue=1&page=282)

nanograms?

Actually, I wonder how they administered the dosages? Fog? Do spiders drink water?

[melancholeric]

I think femtogram would be closer. (10^-18)

I heard they laced flypaper with acid and fed the flies caught with that to the spiders.Not very reliable if you ask me. then again, the doses are quite low.

Now you can't even use the url tag, no wonder you fucked up the previous link.

Here's how it's done. (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82974#post82974)

[mgb]

I think femtogram would be closer. (10^-18)

I heard they laced flypaper with acid and fed the flies caught with that to the spiders.Not very reliable if you ask me. then again, the doses are quite low.

Now you can't even use the url tag, no wonder you fucked up the previous link.

Here's how it's done. (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82974#post82974)

I got lazy. I'm so ashamed.

Almost as ashamed as Jemma from Tannum Sands.

You could argue that those doses we too low and they webs were a product of weird spiders. As well, aren't spiders known for wrapping up their prey and saving them in their webs? What is the useful life span of digested drugs?

[melancholeric]

Who's this Jemma from Tannum Sands I keep hearing about?

Well, the drug naive spiders web wasn't very impressive either, so maybe the spiders were just weird.

We could calculate the optimal dose with LSD/bodyweight ratio. Assume average human taking acid weighs 80 kg, the threshold dose is somewhere around 60-100 ( = 80 for simplicity ) micrograms. How much does a spider weigh? Divide that by 10^9 (or multiply by 10^-9, which amounts to pretty much the same thing) and you get the threshold dose for spiders.

LSD is water soluble and leaves human body (within urine) within a few hours. Don't know about flies, the research is somewhat lacking on this field.

Now, how much does google spider weigh?

[mgb]

Who's this Jemma from Tannum Sands I keep hearing about?

Well, the drug naive spiders web wasn't very impressive either, so maybe the spiders were just weird.

We could calculate the optimal dose with LSD/bodyweight ratio. Assume average human taking acid weighs 80 kg, the threshold dose is somewhere around 60-100 ( = 80 for simplicity ) micrograms. How much does a spider weigh? Divide that by 10^9 (or multiply by 10^-9, which amounts to pretty much the same thing) and you get the threshold dose for spiders.

LSD is water soluble and leaves human body (within urine) within a few hours. Don't know about flies, the research is somewhat lacking on this field.

Now, how much does google spider weigh?

I wonder if Jemma from Tannum Sands knows how much the google spider weighs. I hope she signs up soon so we can ask her. She might be the only person in whole wide world that knows.

The real question is how would you drug the google spider? I say intravenously.

[Claverhouse]

LSD is water soluble and leaves human body (within urine) within a few hours. Don't know about flies, the research is somewhat lacking on this field.
Well, spiders defecate, but don't urinate, I believe from this (http://www.donn.com/essays.htm) ( much like birds, although they are not linked very closely in the great chain of being )


Are you wondering how spiders digest and defecate their liquid diets? This won’t take long. You will be surprised to find out that spiders retain energy from their meals for long periods of time. In an experiment done with Black-widow spiders, it was observed that they were able to live to 200 days without feeding (Foelix, 1996; p. 47). As mentioned earlier, spider digestion is initiated outside of the body. Liquid material ingested by spiders is sucked into the digestive tract by the vacuum action of the stomach. The accordion effect generated by the suspended musculature of the stomach chamber draws the food from outside the body, into the esophagus, through the stomach, and into the midgut. During the digestive process, unacceptable materials are trapped by fine hairs lining the digestive tract. Filtered materials dry out and are then ejected through the mouth. Nutrients are absorbed in the midgut. Excess nutrients are stored in the hypodermis, the cellular layer that secretes the exoskeleton, in the form of crystals. Waste products pass to the stercoral pocket, where they are periodically discharge through the anus. The excrement from the spider I was observing was a white, pasty material similar to bird feces. Moreover, I could smell the gas produced by the highly concentrated excrement. Features of the Black-widow spider excrement have become useful clues for me in locating the whereabouts of the spider from a safe distance. I can easily smell a spider that has been feeding in a confined area, such as the corner of a room. More often, I recognize the white uric acid droppings underneath furniture as the current or past location below a Black-widow spider.


So if any of the scientifically-minded here could feed LSD to half a dozen Black Widows and live with them until they have voided, we may get somewhere.


At least to another 10 pages.





Claverhouse :ph34r:

[melancholeric]

We drug up the google spider with vast amounts of postmodern existential self-referential links. If that doesn't make it atleast slightly dizzy, I don't know what does. That, or we feed some flies to it. Speaking of flies, I wonder what the results of the web experiment would have been if they had used the fly agaric (http://www.erowid.org/plants/amanitas/amanitas.shtml).

The google spider weight is indeed a fascinating question, I really hope Jemma from Tannum Sands joins us to ponder this mystery.

Claverhouse, no matter how interesting that information was, its relevancy can be questioned. We were discussing the digestive process of flies caught with LSD-laced flypaper that were then fed to the spiders. Well, it is relevant if you're planning to get high by eating the spiders, but for some reason I think there are more efficient methods for that.

And ten pages is nowhere enough; last time we derailed a thread, it took approximately 14 pages using the default 10 posts per page, or 7 with 20 posts, which is what I'm using. Let's see how far this goes.

[mgb]

We drug up the google spider with vast amounts of postmodern existential self-referential links. If that doesn't make it atleast slightly dizzy, I don't know what does. That, or we feed some flies to it. Speaking of flies, I wonder what the results of the web experiment would have been if they had used the fly agaric (http://www.erowid.org/plants/amanitas/amanitas.shtml).

The google spider weight is indeed a fascinating question, I really hope Jemma from Tannum Sands joins us to ponder this mystery.

Claverhouse, no matter how interesting that information was, its relevancy can be questioned. We were discussing the digestive process of flies caught with LSD-laced flypaper that were then fed to the spiders. Well, it is relevant if you're planning to get high by eating the spiders, but for some reason I think there are more efficient methods for that.

And ten pages is nowhere enough; last time we derailed a thread, it took approximately 14 pages using the default 10 posts per page, or 7 with 20 posts, which is what I'm using. Let's see how far this goes.


I'm using 100 posts per page. So I'm still on the first page. Even Jemma from Tannum Sands would agree this thread isn't nearly long enough.

I tried looking up fly digestion (http://www.trustpestcontrol.com/fly.htm) but that wasn't super exciting.

Do you think the google spider gains or loses weight as it eats? I suppose heat is lost...

[melancholeric]

Heat is lost if it's eating cold food. If it's warm, then that obviously can't happen. What does it eat? Flies, I suppose. What is their body temperature after they've been caught with flypaper laced with LSD?

And no, that wasn't super exciting. Spiders are much more intriguing creatures anyway. Especially spiders tripping on acid.

Here's how the google spider will fall in love with Jemma:
Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82917#post82917).

[mgb]

Heat is lost if it's eating cold food. If it's warm, then that obviously can't happen. What does it eat? Flies, I suppose. What is their body temperature after they've been caught with flypaper laced with LSD?

And no, that wasn't super exciting. Spiders are much more intriguing creatures anyway. Especially spiders tripping on acid.

Here's how the google spider will fall in love with Jemma:
Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82917#post82917).

Are you trying crash the google spider?

That will make Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82917#post82917) very very mad. And you won't like her when she is angry.

[Claverhouse]

But some drugs ( and sex, and rock and roll ) instantly increase body temperature... Does acid ? If only we had some members in this forum who had experimented with drugs, who could tell us.

Not, I would hastily add, that spiders enjoy sex and rock & roll, or at least not whilst tripping. They probably enjoy sex, but only the most libidinous human would opt for intercourse if it meant being eaten afterwards.

Still, having reread my post above, I should point out that the Methodist priestess who speaks of Sir Francis Chichester in one of her no doubt typical sermonettes ( *meditates mentioning LSD but decides against it* ), speaks of his using a sexton to guide his way by means of the sun and stars. Since a sexton was a man who looked after a church in the old days, I rather think she must mean a sextant.

I wonder if he flew near Tannum Sands ?



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[Shai Gar]

i figured i should just tell you, Jemma isnt from tannum sands.
i am from tannum sands
we both go to school at tannum sands
she lives in a town not that far away that starts with an "I"

[Shai Gar]

Shai' Gar says:
do you know how much the google spider weighs?

do u believe in :wub: at first slight or should i walk past u again says:
no


there you go guys, Jemma knows not

[Serotonin]

i figured i should just tell you, Jemma isnt from tannum sands.
i am from tannum sands
we both go to school at tannum sands
she lives in a town not that far away that starts with an "I"

http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=jemma+iveragh&btnG=Search&meta=cr%3DcountryAU

:(

[Division56]

I bet the entire area is served by one newspaper... *takes out full page ad*

[Shai Gar]

hahaha, that is certainly the town.

[Shai Gar]

2 newspapers, the courier mail (statewide), Gladstone Observer (regional)

[songbird36]

i figured i should just tell you, Jemma isnt from tannum sands.
i am from tannum sands
we both go to school at tannum sands
she lives in a town not that far away that starts with an "I"

Are you using "school" loosely here? Or are you actually still at school?

[Shai Gar]

i thought you knew?

i left year 12 about now 4 years ago, then this year i came back to high school to get my OP

[songbird36]

ah no - I didn't know that..

[Shai Gar]

well now you do, i am currently working through the begining of my Se

[melancholeric]

Are you trying crash the google spider?

That will make Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82917#post82917) very very mad. And you won't like her when she is angry.
No, not at all. As I said, I only want to it to get high.

with a little help from Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83148#post83148).


But some drugs ( and sex, and rock and roll ) instantly increase body temperature... Does acid ? If only we had some members in this forum who had experimented with drugs, who could tell us.
According to Erowid LSD effects page (http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/lsd/lsd_effects.shtml), LSD causes "slight increase in body temperature".


http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=jemma+iveragh&btnG=Search&meta=cr%3DcountryAU

:(
Does Jemma from Tannum Sands live in iveragh? I'll probably have to do some editing with some of my posts in this thread.


Shai, if you want this thread to die ( and I still don't understand why ), why are you posting in this thread?

Does it have something to do with Jemma? You want her to register so she can have post number 500 in this thread and thus get the special award that was mentioned earlier?

[Architectonic]

This thread is GAY!








Oh wait, wrong thread. ;P

[Geoff]

This thread is GAY!








Oh wait, wrong thread. ;P

That was alogical...

-Geoff

[Architectonic]

Actually, I believe it was illogical. :ph34r:

[mgb]

Does it really matter where Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&goto=lastpost) is really from? In our hearts and minds she is really a Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&goto=lastpost) girl.

[melancholeric]

I don't know if it matters where Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83412#post83412) is from, but if she's from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337), our hearts would be right.

And my heart has been wrong too many times...


I have a hunch that google spider is going to get lost with the psychedelic web of cyber-existentialism we have created.

[mgb]

I don't know if it matters where Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83412#post83412) is from, but if she's from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337), our hearts would be right.

And my heart has been wrong too many times...


I have a hunch that google spider is going to get lost with the psychedelic web of cyber-existentialism we have created.

Blurring the lines (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&goto=lastpost) between art and reality.

Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&goto=lastpost) would be so proud of us.

[Claverhouse]

Possibly the spider now has a severe psychosis, but a Google for Jemma Tannum Sands only shows 5 of 7 links, none pertaining to this thread or this forum ( unlike yesterday ).

Which seems a shame.

Anyone else annoyed by the fact that Google periodically loses one's preferences, and defaults to 10 links per page and safe filtering ? Which has made no difference to the search for Jemma of Tannum Sands. ( At least that means intpcentral is not regarded as having questionable content: which will please Jemma of Tannum Sands. )


Claverhouse :ph34r:

[Shai Gar]

stop it

[melancholeric]

I never got any links to this thread, only to Shai's profile. Kind of ironic when you consider the link in his profile.

However, I am confident Google spider will find Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83148#post83148) any time soon.

Or Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&goto=lastpost) will find this thread, with the help of google spider of course.

[Claverhouse]

I never got any links to this thread, only to Shai's profile. Kind of ironic when you consider the link in his profile.
Exactly, but considering the gift when I clicked on his frogsex homepage --- and those licking their lips hoping to see amphibians shagging would be severely disappointed: this was more for sad perverts --- it's the people using IE I'm sorry for. The trojan could download instantly.

Microsoft sucks.



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[booyalab]

I wish my vote counted.

[Shai Gar]

at least money can still be made from internet porn businesses

the only dotcoms that count anymore

[mgb]

at least money can still be made from internet porn businesses

the only dotcoms that count anymore

Maybe we could put up some "other" pictures of Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&goto=lastpost) so we can create a new search of "Jemma from Tannum Sands" and "porn".

[Claverhouse]

No, that would be wrong. We have no quarrel with Jemma of Tannum Sands.

But if Shai thinks there's nothing wrong with the internet porn industry: it might be possible, with a considerable amount of work, to make Google turn up Richard Whereat whenever people search for Giants of Porn. I couldn't really be bothered though.

Discussion: Is porn morally degrading, or a valid search for meaning in life ?



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[Shai Gar]

porn is the valid search for a way to get off. a legal high.

[mgb]

porn is the valid search for a way to get off. a legal high.

So is teasing the google spider with this. (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&goto=lastpost)

[booyalab]

Discussion: Is porn morally degrading, or a valid search for meaning in life ?



Claverhouse :ph34r:

Your assumption is that people either perceive porn as morally degrading or a quest for meaning. heh

[songbird36]

Your assumption is that people either perceive porn as morally degrading or a quest for meaning. heh

Umm..I think he was being tongue-in-cheek. Damn Brits - their tongues are permanently stuck there.

[melancholeric]

So is teasing the google spider with this. (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&goto=lastpost)
Not to mention teasing Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83068#post83068) of Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82917#post82917) with the google spider.

By the way, when did it change from "Jemma from Tannum Sands" to "Jemma of Tannum Sands"? This must be among the most interesting questions I've seen on this board for a while...


Discussion: Is porn morally degrading, or a valid search for meaning in life ?
Personally, I don't know if I believe in "morals" at all, but if I did, I'd have no moral problems whatsoever with porn. However, every experience, including adult entertaiment, helps in getting closer to the ultimate truths. Such as the meaning for life.

One: people are not wearing enough hats.

Two: matter is energy. In the universe, there are many energy fields which we cannot normally perceive. Some energies have a spiritual source which act upon a person's soul. However, this soul does not exist ab initio, as orthodox Christianity teaches. It has to be brought into existence by a process of guided self-observation. However, this is rarely achieved, owing to man's unique ability to be distracted from spiritual matters by everyday trivia.

The "spiritual matters", of course, means porn.

How about live organ transplants?

[booyalab]

Umm..I think he was being tongue-in-cheek. Damn Brits - their tongues are permanently stuck there.

me too...too bad I ruined it with the 'heh'

[Claverhouse]

By the way, when did it change from "Jemma from Tannum Sands" to "Jemma of Tannum Sands"? This must be among the most interesting questions I've seen on this board for a while... When Jemma achieved Fame.



Personally, I don't know if I believe in "morals" at all, but if I did, I'd have no moral problems whatsoever with porn. Well, naturally, everything can be abused by over-use; and the innocent delight of the young voyager just starting to get to grips with hitherto terra incognita ultimately fades into the brittle wreck of prematurely feeble old age, thanks to over-indulgence. And of course there is the question that worries every user, as to whether the participants are free agents.



However, this soul does not exist ab initio, as orthodox Christianity teaches. It has to be brought into existence by a process of guided self-observation. I would welcome some empirical evidence of both statements. Not that I doubt your word, but the Google Spider may pick up on any discussion of metaphysics ( it --- or, he or she: we have not discussed the sex --- must get so tired of endless porn. You can't even give a simple query, like 'hot pussies panting excited desperate wet pull dirty bad boy' [ limit of ten words ], when all you want is the lyrics to the old English ballad 'Ding Dong Bell: Pussy's in the Well' or descriptions of how Turkish Van Cats swim, without getting pages of unseemly information ).



However, this is rarely achieved, owing to man's unique ability to be distracted from spiritual matters by everyday trivia. Not on this board !



How about live organ transplants? I reject them.


Claverhouse :ph34r:

[SensEye]

...or descriptions of how Turkish Van Cats swim, without getting pages of unseemly informationCuriosity aroused (no pun intended), I googled forthwith. I am happy to report no unseemly pages whatsoever, and that the Turkish Van seems like a very desireable cat.

[Claverhouse]

Curiosity aroused (no pun intended), I googled forthwith. I am happy to report no unseemly pages whatsoever, and that the Turkish Van seems like a very desireable cat.
Alarmed by this, I did as Jemma would wish, and pasted the words in my post exactly as written above to prove my point.

My point was proved.


Claverhouse :ph34r:

[mgb]

When Jemma achieved Fame.

Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&goto=lastpost) isn't famous yet. Not until we seal the deal on the merchendising.

[melancholeric]

When Jemma achieved Fame.
What fame? Even the google spider doesn't know Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83414#post83414) of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83497#post83497). Yet.


Well, naturally, everything can be abused by over-use; and the innocent delight of the young voyager just starting to get to grips with hitherto terra incognita ultimately fades into the brittle wreck of prematurely feeble old age, thanks to over-indulgence.
People have died from water intoxication (http://thedea.org/hyponatremia.html), but that doesn't make drinking water a moral problem. Moderation is the key to happy and moral life.

And of course there is the question that worries every user, as to whether the participants are free agents.
I have to assume they are, as I have no proof on the contrary.


I would welcome some empirical evidence of both statements.
I hope you understand that this is not particularly easy.

Not that I doubt your word, but the Google Spider may pick up on any discussion of metaphysics
Well if that's the case, how about feeding the spider with this:

Feminism, Baudrillardist simulation and neopatriarchial theory

Linda Y. J. d'Erlette
Department of Future Studies, University of California, Berkeley
M. Jane Finnis
Department of Literature, University of North Carolina

1. Contexts of genre

The characteristic theme of Dahmus's[1] essay on neopatriarchial theory is the difference between art and society. Thus, the main theme of the works of Burroughs is not deconstruction, as textual precultural theory suggests, but neodeconstruction. An abundance of discourses concerning dialectic deappropriation exist.

It could be said that the example of neopatriarchial theory which is a central theme of Burroughs's Nova Express is also evident in The Last Words of Dutch Schultz, although in a more self-fulfilling sense. Marx uses the term 'postcapitalist semioticist theory' to denote the common ground between sexual identity and class.

Therefore, if textual precultural theory holds, we have to choose between predeconstructive narrative and textual postcapitalist theory. Textual precultural theory suggests that reality is a product of communication, given that reality is distinct from language. In a sense, the primary theme of Dietrich's[2] analysis of neocapitalist Marxism is the failure, and subsequent rubicon, of cultural sexuality. Bailey[3] states that we have to choose between textual precultural theory and poststructuralist cultural theory.

2. Burroughs and neomodern construction

"Society is part of the rubicon of language," says Debord. But the premise of neopatriarchial theory implies that reality is elitist. If the capitalist paradigm of reality holds, we have to choose between neopatriarchial theory and precultural capitalist theory.

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the distinction between without and within. In a sense, Bataille suggests the use of textual precultural theory to attack the status quo. The characteristic theme of the works of Burroughs is not, in fact, desublimation, but neodesublimation.

Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a neopatriarchial theory that includes consciousness as a whole. The primary theme of McElwaine's[4] critique of neocapitalist Marxism is the difference between class and society.

But the subject is contextualised into a neopatriarchial theory that includes reality as a reality. Any number of discourses concerning the stasis, and eventually the genre, of subdeconstructive sexual identity may be revealed.

It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a textual precultural theory that includes language as a whole. Derrida uses the term 'textual rationalism' to denote a postcapitalist totality.

3. Neocapitalist Marxism and textual prepatriarchialist theory

If one examines neopatriarchial theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept cultural narrative or conclude that academe is capable of intent, but only if Marx's model of neopatriarchial theory is valid; otherwise, sexuality serves to reinforce class divisions. However, in The Crying of Lot 49, Pynchon deconstructs textual prepatriarchialist theory; in Mason & Dixon, although, he analyses neocapitalist Marxism. The main theme of the works of Pynchon is not theory, as Lacan would have it, but neotheory.

"Narrativity is intrinsically meaningless," says Marx. Therefore, the premise of the postcapitalist paradigm of discourse suggests that class has objective value. The primary theme of Werther's[5] essay on neopatriarchial theory is the common ground between sexual identity and reality.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a semioticist desituationism that includes narrativity as a reality. Tilton[6] states that we have to choose between textual prepatriarchialist theory and the neopatriarchial paradigm of narrative.

In a sense, the main theme of the works of Pynchon is the defining characteristic, and hence the economy, of capitalist society. If neocapitalist Marxism holds, we have to choose between neopatriarchial theory and Baudrillardist simulacra.

But Lacan promotes the use of textual prepatriarchialist theory to modify and analyse class. The subject is interpolated into a preconstructivist discourse that includes truth as a whole.

4. Pynchon and textual prepatriarchialist theory

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of dialectic art. Therefore, Bataille suggests the use of neopatriarchial theory to deconstruct the status quo. The subject is contextualised into a Foucaultist power relations that includes consciousness as a paradox.

The characteristic theme of Pickett's[7] analysis of textual prepatriarchialist theory is the role of the observer as writer. It could be said that the primary theme of the works of Rushdie is a self-supporting totality. De Selby[8] suggests that we have to choose between neopatriarchial theory and capitalist theory.

"Sexual identity is part of the absurdity of narrativity," says Sontag; however, according to Sargeant[9] , it is not so much sexual identity that is part of the absurdity of narrativity, but rather the futility, and eventually the dialectic, of sexual identity. But Lacan's critique of neocapitalist Marxism states that consciousness is used to disempower the proletariat. Bataille promotes the use of textual prepatriarchialist theory to read society.

"Class is fundamentally impossible," says Derrida. It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a Lacanist obscurity that includes sexuality as a reality. Foucault suggests the use of neopatriarchial theory to challenge class divisions.

Therefore, if presemanticist dialectic theory holds, the works of Rushdie are modernistic. Neopatriarchial theory suggests that society, paradoxically, has intrinsic meaning, but only if language is equal to sexuality; if that is not the case, we can assume that truth may be used to entrench hierarchy.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a neocapitalist Marxism that includes art as a totality. Geoffrey[10] states that we have to choose between neocultural socialism and Sontagist camp.

Therefore, Baudrillard promotes the use of neocapitalist Marxism to deconstruct and read class. Several narratives concerning neopatriarchial theory exist.

Thus, Debord uses the term 'textual prepatriarchialist theory' to denote the bridge between society and sexual identity. Lacan suggests the use of materialist theory to attack sexism.

However, the characteristic theme of la Fournier's[11] essay on textual prepatriarchialist theory is the role of the poet as reader. Derrida uses the term 'Debordist situation' to denote the absurdity of subcultural sexual identity.

5. Textual prepatriarchialist theory and the constructivist paradigm of consensus

The main theme of the works of Gaiman is not sublimation, but neosublimation. Thus, Foucault promotes the use of neopatriarchial theory to deconstruct society. If neocapitalist Marxism holds, we have to choose between subdialectic textual theory and the precultural paradigm of context.

Therefore, the characteristic theme of Abian's[12] model of neocapitalist Marxism is the paradigm, and eventually the defining characteristic, of postcapitalist class. Sartre uses the term 'deconstructive prestructuralist theory' to denote the role of the poet as artist.

It could be said that any number of theories concerning not narrative, but neonarrative may be found. The primary theme of the works of Gaiman is a mythopoetical paradox. Thus, the subject is interpolated into a constructivist paradigm of consensus that includes culture as a reality. Many dematerialisms concerning neopatriarchial theory exist.

6. Gaiman and dialectic theory

"Reality is part of the meaninglessness of consciousness," says Bataille. It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a neocapitalist Marxism that includes language as a whole. Sontag suggests the use of neopatriarchial theory to challenge the status quo.

"Society is dead," says Lyotard; however, according to Reicher[13] , it is not so much society that is dead, but rather the futility, and subsequent defining characteristic, of society. Thus, the premise of the textual paradigm of discourse suggests that consciousness is intrinsically responsible for capitalism. Sartre uses the term 'the constructivist paradigm of consensus' to denote the role of the writer as reader.

The main theme of Sargeant's[14] essay on neocapitalist Marxism is the failure of subcultural reality. In a sense, the primary theme of the works of Tarantino is the role of the poet as reader. A number of theories concerning the collapse, and subsequent futility, of capitalist class may be revealed.

In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the distinction between figure and ground. But the characteristic theme of Werther's[15] critique of cultural postsemioticist theory is the role of the artist as poet. Neopatriarchial theory holds that sexuality has objective value.

"Society is a legal fiction," says Foucault; however, according to Hamburger[16] , it is not so much society that is a legal fiction, but rather the economy of society. Therefore, Porter[17] implies that we have to choose between the constructivist paradigm of consensus and Derridaist reading. The premise of the neocultural paradigm of discourse holds that the raison d'etre of the participant is social comment, given that neopatriarchial theory is invalid.

But if neocapitalist Marxism holds, we have to choose between neopatriarchial theory and deconstructive appropriation. The subject is interpolated into a precultural narrative that includes language as a totality.

It could be said that in Death: The High Cost of Living, Gaiman deconstructs neocapitalist Marxism; in Black Orchid, however, he analyses semioticist theory. An abundance of desituationisms concerning neopatriarchial theory exist.

Therefore, the main theme of the works of Gaiman is the difference between sexual identity and reality. Lyotard uses the term 'Lacanist obscurity' to denote the role of the reader as observer.

Thus, Porter[18] suggests that we have to choose between the constructivist paradigm of consensus and the subcultural paradigm of context. If patriarchial discourse holds, the works of Gaiman are not postmodern.

In a sense, many constructions concerning a postcapitalist whole may be discovered. Bataille promotes the use of neocapitalist Marxism to modify and deconstruct class.

But Derrida uses the term 'Sontagist camp' to denote the genre, and eventually the futility, of dialectic sexual identity. Baudrillard's analysis of neopatriarchial theory implies that the media is fundamentally elitist.

7. The submodern paradigm of narrative and cultural narrative

"Truth is a legal fiction," says Lacan. Thus, Baudrillard uses the term 'neocapitalist Marxism' to denote not, in fact, appropriation, but postappropriation. The subject is contextualised into a presemiotic paradigm of discourse that includes reality as a reality.

"Sexual identity is part of the absurdity of culture," says Sartre; however, according to Werther[19] , it is not so much sexual identity that is part of the absurdity of culture, but rather the defining characteristic, and subsequent rubicon, of sexual identity. In a sense, neocapitalist Marxism suggests that context is created by the collective unconscious. Foucault suggests the use of neopatriarchial theory to challenge outmoded, colonialist perceptions of narrativity.

"Class is unattainable," says Sontag. It could be said that the dialectic of neocapitalist Marxism depicted in Joyce's Ulysses emerges again in Dubliners. The primary theme of Hamburger's[20] model of neopatriarchial theory is a mythopoetical totality.

In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the concept of conceptualist sexuality. But Derrida promotes the use of cultural narrative to read sexual identity. Debord uses the term 'subdialectic theory' to denote not discourse per se, but neodiscourse.

However, the premise of neocapitalist Marxism states that truth is part of the meaninglessness of language. In A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man, Joyce denies neopatriarchial theory; in Ulysses he deconstructs cultural narrative.

In a sense, Dietrich[21] implies that we have to choose between neopatriarchial theory and cultural narrative. The characteristic theme of the works of Gibson is the role of the artist as writer. Thus, if neocapitalist Marxism holds, we have to choose between the postdialectic paradigm of expression and textual nihilism. Baudrillard suggests the use of cultural narrative to deconstruct capitalism.

However, any number of theories concerning precultural narrative exist. The opening/closing distinction which is a central theme of Gibson's Neuromancer is also evident in All Tomorrow's Parties, although in a more dialectic sense.

It could be said that a number of theories concerning the common ground between sexuality and society may be revealed. Debord uses the term 'neopatriarchial theory' to denote not situationism, but subsituationism.

In a sense, many narratives concerning Lyotardist narrative exist. Marx promotes the use of cultural narrative to attack and modify sexual identity.

1. Dahmus, B. O. J. (1970) Deconstructing Modernism: Neopatriarchial theory in the works of Tarantino. University of California Press

2. Dietrich, B. ed. (1987) Neocapitalist Marxism and neopatriarchial theory. Cambridge University Press

3. Bailey, N. Q. (1994) The Narrative of Paradigm: Neopatriarchial theory in the works of McLaren. O'Reilly & Associates

4. McElwaine, Z. ed. (1976) Neocapitalist Marxism in the works of Pynchon. Panic Button Books

5. Werther, E. U. (1992) The Paradigm of Culture: Neopatriarchial theory in the works of Pynchon. Oxford University Press

6. Tilton, B. ed. (1987) Neopatriarchial theory in the works of Tarantino. Loompanics

7. Pickett, F. T. W. (1970) The Context of Stasis: Neopatriarchial theory in the works of Rushdie. University of North Carolina Press

8. de Selby, Z. ed. (1985) Neopatriarchial theory, feminism and the neodeconstructivist paradigm of reality. Yale University Press

9. Sargeant, F. B. (1978) Subsemioticist Narratives: Neopatriarchial theory and neocapitalist Marxism. Panic Button Books

10. Geoffrey, V. B. L. ed. (1993) Neopatriarchial theory in the works of Mapplethorpe. Loompanics

11. la Fournier, P. (1970) The Failure of Society: Neocapitalist Marxism in the works of Gaiman. University of Michigan Press

12. Abian, E. M. ed. (1991) Neocapitalist Marxism and neopatriarchial theory. University of Georgia Press

13. Reicher, D. A. U. (1989) The Failure of Consensus: Postcapitalist appropriation, neopatriarchial theory and feminism. Harvard University Press

14. Sargeant, N. T. ed. (1974) Neocapitalist Marxism in the works of Tarantino. University of Illinois Press

15. Werther, I. (1981) Neotextual Discourses: Neopatriarchial theory in the works of Pynchon. And/Or Press

16. Hamburger, G. R. ed. (1990) Textual desituationism, feminism and neopatriarchial theory. O'Reilly & Associates

17. Porter, E. (1974) The Context of Collapse: Neopatriarchial theory in the works of Gaiman. Panic Button Books

18. Porter, G. J. ed. (1983) Neopatriarchial theory in the works of Tarantino. University of Massachusetts Press

19. Werther, M. T. H. (1996) Reading Baudrillard: Neopatriarchial theory in the works of Joyce. O'Reilly & Associates

20. Hamburger, F. M. ed. (1989) Neopatriarchial theory and neocapitalist Marxism. University of Illinois Press

21. Dietrich, Z. N. E. (1972) The Narrative of Dialectic: Neopatriarchial theory in the works of Gibson. And/Or Press






( it --- or, he or she: we have not discussed the sex
Well now that you brought it up, it is a fascinating question. Especially for the arachnophiles that we may have on the boards.

You can't even give a simple query, like 'hot pussies panting excited desperate wet pull dirty bad boy' [ limit of ten words ], when all you want is the lyrics to the old English ballad 'Ding Dong Bell: Pussy's in the Well'
Doesn't the ballad contain a phrase that would not include the word "pussy" or others that are frequently associated with adult entertaiment by morally corrupt webmasters?


or descriptions of how Turkish Van Cats swim, without getting pages of unseemly information ).
I initially refused to google for this. I was at work when I first read this message, and I had a feeling that someone could monitor my internet use. And that someone wouldn't approve the results of such search. I tried it now at home, and I was proven right. My boss didn't like the Pussy pictures (http://pussy-maus.de/) site either.


Not on this board !
I think we have a good balance on discussing the spiritual matters and the trivial issues. I already said that the "spiritual matters" means porn.


I reject them.
Does this mean that you don't want to donate or don't want to receive them?

and mgbr, how about making your sig link to point to the first unread post? This conversation moves so fast and is thoroughly fascinating, and we don't want anyone to miss a single post. If I had gone directly to the last post, I would have missed the post by Claverhouse that I replied to here.

( http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294 should do it. )

[mgb]

Done on the signature.

Although, I was thinking about it, shouldn't all the Jemma related links go back to the top of the site, so the google spider has a bigger web to weave?

Anyways, interesting article. It made me feel smart because I understood most of it. I wonder if Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294)would understand it's meaning?

I do have to wonder if people that write stuff like that realize that they are terminally boring.

[booyalab]

I wonder if Jemma from Tannum Sands would understand it's meaning? (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294)


she's an ESFP, what do you think?

[melancholeric]

And it took only 10 minutes from you to read and understand the article, modify your signature, and post that reply. Very impressive, particularly with the article.

I wonder if Jemma of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) could be as fast.

I also wonder if you actually know where the "article" is from.....

Grammar question: if you start a sentence with "I wonder if..." and then give a question, is the sentence a question or a statement that you "wonder if.." and should it end with a period or a question mark? Not being a native English speaker, I don't know about the rules. In Finnish such sentence would end with a period, and it certainly makes more sense to me.

[booyalab]

I wonder if this sentence should end in a period or a question mark. <---

if you were questioning whether you wonder about it, then it would end as a question. Although that would probably mean you're insane.
I wonder if I'm insane?

[mgb]

And it took only 10 minutes from you to read and understand the article, modify your signature, and post that reply. Very impressive, particularly with the article.

I wonder if Jemma of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) be as fast.

I also wonder if you actually know where the "article" is from.....

Grammar question: if you start a sentence with "I wonder if..." and then give a question, is the sentence a question or a statement that you "wonder if.." and should it end with a period or a question mark? Not being a native English speaker, I don't know about the rules. In Finnish such sentence would end with a period, and it certainly makes more sense to me.

The "if" makes it a question...but I think it can go either way.

As far as the article....I'll do some looking.

[booyalab]

The "if" makes it a question...but I think it can go either way.

As far as the article....I'll do some looking.

refer to my answer, he doesnt know.

[melancholeric]

I wonder if this sentence should end in a period or a question mark. <---

if you were questioning whether you wonder about it, then it would end as a question. Although that would probably mean you're insane.
I wonder if I'm insane?
I though it should end in a period, but I wasn't sure.

If you question whether you wonder it, shouldn't it be "Do I wonder if... ?"

mgbr, I doubt you'll find that exact article anywhere, but you'll find plenty of similar articles here (http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/).

Jemma of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294) likes those articles too.

[booyalab]

I though it should end in a period, but I wasn't sure.

If you question whether you wonder it, shouldn't it be "Do I wonder if... ?"


The correct meaning behind "I wonder if I'm insane?" would be asking yourself if you wonder if you're insane, that's what I was getting at. But, you're right, the syntax is still incorrect.

[mgb]

After googling and not finding it, I did find an article on elsewhere.org by a Stephen B. d'Erlette. He is either the brother or spouse of Linda Y. J. because there probably aren't another two d'Erlettes' in the world that are equally as boring and prone to use their middle initials (so East Coast) as those two.

So I'd say it's from there, at least on the internet. The hard copy can probably be found on an English Literature Journal and probably more specifically dealing with Post-Modern theory and literary criticism. If I had to guess, I'd say the journal is published through an Ivy League school or Berkley.

Gotta love the crap that comes out of publish or perish. Drucker's article on Tarantino was much more captivating (http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/%23fn5). He also might be the only person to have purchased Linda's husband's/brother's book.

[mgb]

I though it should end in a period, but I wasn't sure.

If you question whether you wonder it, shouldn't it be "Do I wonder if... ?"

mgbr, I doubt you'll find that exact article anywhere, but you'll find plenty of similar articles here (http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/).

Jemma of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294) likes those articles too.

Ooops, posting while you were.

What if you said, "If Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294) does X, shouldn't Y happen?"

Then it's a question?

[booyalab]

What if you said, "If Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294) does X, shouldn't Y happen?"

Then it's a question?

Yeah but he wasn't wondering that, WAS HE?

I wonder if mgbradsh is illiterate.

[mgb]

Yeah but he wasn't wondering that, WAS HE?

I wonder if mgbradsh is illiterate.

I wonder if booyalab wants to be called Jemma2 from now on?

[melancholeric]

Checked "Who's online". Google Spider 08:52 PM Sending Forum Feedback.

I wonder if it has something to say about this thread. Or Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294) of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84306#post84306).

Whatever it is, I'd really love to see the feedback.

[mgb]

Checked "Who's online". Google Spider 08:52 PM Sending Forum Feedback.

I wonder if it has something to say about this thread. Or Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294) of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84306#post84306).

Whatever it is, I'd really love to see the feedback.

C'monnnnnn down, google spider.

I think, not including my sig. we have about 30 or so links back to this thread. If the google spider works the way I think it should...it should end up opening close to a billion pages because of this thread before it gets through it. Which is why the links should reference the thread and not each post.

That should give Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84306#post84306), a whole new world on the internet.

[melancholeric]

How exactly? The links refer to certain points (posts) in this thread, not to individual posts like if you clicked the link #115 in your post. the thread is still visible. I think if it gets stuck to one of those loops we have, it will inevitably index this page some googol times. How do you think it works? Because I'm not sure.

now, what bugs me here is that the spider uses the format forums.intpcentral.com (all search results to this page use that format), and we have used intpcentral.com/forums . I think the whole thing could have been more efficient if we had used the former format. Are we going to edit the links?

Jemma from tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294)

[mgb]

How exactly? The links refer to certain points (posts) in this thread, not to individual posts like if you clicked the link #115 in your post. the thread is still visible. I think if it gets stuck to one of those loops we have, it will inevitably index this page some googol times. How do you think it works? Because I'm not sure.

now, what bugs me here is that the spider uses the format forums.intpcentral.com (all search results to this page use that format), and we have used intpcentral.com/forums . I think the whole thing could have been more efficient if we had used the former format. Are we going to edit the links?

Jemma from tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294)

I see the google spider working by, reading a page. It opens a new link when it comes to it and starts reading. Also, it keeps reading the first page and opening anymore links it comes to. So growth in this case as far as windows and reading should be exponential and based on the number of links it comes across.

I could be wrong. And if I am let me know.

I also wonder if it explores the new site or just the page it's linked too. I assume just the page, and perhaps only the part of the page it links to.

Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84446#post84446) must be an expert on this if nothing else.

[Claverhouse]

What fame? Even the google spider doesn't know Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83414#post83414) of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83497#post83497). Yet
Even the fleeting fame of being known here is something; particularly as she is unaware of the fact --- and unaware of the peril of the google spider ( perhaps not wholly dissimilar to the lady-spider in LOTR: a rather pathetic case I always thought --- but then I'm the only person who ever felt faintly sorry for Grendal and his Mother... ).

Like Andromeda, as the great Gustav Dore portrayed her, she waits her fate with but the knowledge that Shai will prove a Perseus,

http://www.intpcentral.com/uploads/dore1.jpg


People have died from water intoxication (http://thedea.org/hyponatremia.html), but that doesn't make drinking water a moral problem. Moderation is the key to happy and moral life.
I would agree, but the addictive nature of this vice, for such it probably may be --- I decline to be more certain: only to say that bad photography is in itself vicious --- ensnares the unhappy enthusiast until it takes over his very soul. Condemning him to a wasted life of regrets and might-have-beens. I saw this happen at school.


I have to assume they are, as I have no proof on the contrary.
Well, intense debate goes on in the pornographic consumers circles as to whether it is right to get excited over persons who may have been kidnapped or improperly seduced into taking off their clothes. Certainly I should doubt if the main actors in snuff movies are volunteers, if snuff movies exist --- which seems unlikely considering the great strides in special effects since say Charlie Chaplin's day.





Well if that's the case, how about feeding the spider with this:

Feminism, Baudrillardist simulation and neopatriarchial theory
etc....

Indeed. I just looove feminists, and deconstructionalists, and neo-marxists, and professors...

[ Admittedly whilst it must have some meaning to them, once they mastered the jargon, it does seem quite strange how they mix the unpleasant yet serious philosophers like Marx and Debord up with the ludicrous posturers such as Tarantino, Rushdie & Sontag...

I presume the De Selby mentioned is no relation to the great de Selby immortalised by Flann O'Brien whom I recently mentioned in another post ?
Night is caused by flakes of darkness coming every 12 hours... ]


Well now that you brought it up, it is a fascinating question. Especially for the arachnophiles that we may have on the boards.
And another: does the Google Spider ever meet the Alltheweb Spider, and others of that ilk ?

What happens when they do ? Do they mate ? Or fight ? Or pass on each other's way with a courteous nod ?

Gin a Spider meets a Spider coming through the rye...

( Rabbie Burns )


Doesn't the ballad contain a phrase that would not include the word "pussy" or others that are frequently associated with adult entertaiment by morally corrupt webmasters?
It might. The full text of the song is here:


Ding dong bell, pussy's in the well
Who put her in? Little Johnny Flynn
Who pulled her out? Little Tommy Stout
What a naughty boy was that, try to drown poor Pussycat,
Who ne'er did any harm
But killed all the mice in the Farmer's barn!
With the further information: 'The origins of this nursery rhyme date back to the 16th century. Shakespeare uses the phrase in the Tempest - Act I, Scene II:
"Sea nymphs hourly ring his knell:
Hark! Now I hear them - Ding, dong, bell."
The lyrics were used to encourage a child to understand that it was unacceptable and cruel to harm any animal that had done no harm. Teaching morality at an early age. Introducing a child to onomatopoeia ( a word that sounds like its meaning) In this nursery rhyme the lyrics and words "ding dong" when pronounced convey the actual sounds!'

Und so weiter

But my point was that one searches because one does not know the text one seeks, therefore one intelligently uses those words which may assist the search. And either for the saved cat in the song, which on a summer's day would be panting and hot once rescued ( and rightfully spitting mad ) or for the noble Van cats breast-stroking along the shores of the Adriatic, that selection turned up much extraneous and well-nigh indecent material. ( Mind you, adding breast-stroking would probably have helped. )


Jemma would understand.


Claverhouse :ph34r:

[melancholeric]

I would agree, but the addictive nature of this vice, for such it probably may be --- I decline to be more certain: only to say that bad photography is in itself vicious --- ensnares the unhappy enthusiast until it takes over his very soul. Condemning him to a wasted life of regrets and might-have-beens. I saw this happen at school.
But water is highly addictive too. No one who has once made the mistake of trying it will ever survive without it. And withdrawal is usually lethal.


Well, intense debate goes on in the pornographic consumers circles as to whether it is right to get excited over persons who may have been kidnapped or improperly seduced into taking off their clothes. Certainly I should doubt if the main actors in snuff movies are volunteers, if snuff movies exist --- which seems unlikely considering the great strides in special effects since say Charlie Chaplin's day.
As far as I know, the persons I get excited over have never said anything about being kidnapped. And they don't do snuff movies.


Indeed. I just looove feminists, and deconstructionalists, and neo-marxists, and professors...
I knew you'd say something about feminists, and I considered choosing another essay for that very reason, but then I was too lazy. I just picked the first one.

[ Admittedly whilst it must have some meaning to them, once they mastered the jargon, it does seem quite strange how they mix the unpleasant yet serious philosophers like Marx and Debord up with the ludicrous posturers such as Tarantino, Rushdie & Sontag...
I presume the De Selby mentioned is no relation to the great de Selby immortalised by Flann O'Brien whom I recently mentioned in another post ?
Night is caused by flakes of darkness coming every 12 hours... ]

It makes a lot more sense when you consider who (http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/) "wrote" that.


And another: does the Google Spider ever meet the Alltheweb Spider, and others of that ilk ?

What happens when they do ? Do they mate ? Or fight ? Or pass on each other's way with a courteous nod ?

Gin a Spider meets a Spider coming through the rye...

( Rabbie Burns )

I don't know much about spider behaviour, but I'd guess that if they're both males, they'll fight, if the other is female and other male, they'll mate, and if they're both females they'll start gossiping about the male-dominated society oppressing women. Or something to that effect.



[/url]
Jemma would understand.

[url="http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294"]Jemma of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294) understands everything.

[Claverhouse]

As far as I know, the persons I get excited over have never said anything about being kidnapped. Not if you've kidnapped them yourself...


I knew you'd say something about feminists, and I considered choosing another essay for that very reason, but then I was too lazy. I just picked the first one.

It makes a lot more sense when you consider who (http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/) "wrote" that. Nice. Parody is one of the noblest arts. ( Especially Bret Harte's... ) I followed the link to Alan Sokal's listing (http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/) of commentary on his 'Social Text' affair. Although I merely sampled the texts, I liked this quote from Chomsky:


A quarter-century ago, at the height of the U.S. invasion of Vietnam, Noam Chomsky observed that:

George Orwell once remarked that political thought, especially on the left, is a sort of masturbation fantasy in which the world of fact hardly matters. That's true, unfortunately, and it's part of the reason that our society lacks a genuine, responsible, serious left-wing movement. Which shows that the Left has it's own porn problem.


Claverhouse :ph34r:


It struck me to approach the google puzzle from another angle, and I merely typed in 'tannum sands'. This listed mostly tourist interest: unwisely clicking on TRAVEL AUSTRALIA INTERNET's offering ( it opened java ), I found this:


The city of Gladstone is located 550 kms north of the State capital, Brisbane - an hours flight, a day trip by electric train or highway coach, or half a day by car. The Gladstone Region is a unique area of Queensland - a region where opportunity awaits. The city of Gladstone is developed on hills overlooking the focal point of its economic development - the natural deepwater harbour.The community has grown dramatically from a 'sleepy hollow' township to a major industrial city in less than 20 years, yet has retained the charm of a coastal resort setting with an enviable lifestyle. As the centre of the Southern Reef, access to Heron Island and uninhabited coral cay islands offers visitors the miracle of the Great Barrier Reef. To the south of the city lie the shires of Calliope and Miriam Vale. From idyllic, secluded beaches to scenic National Parks, these shires complete the diversity for which the region is renown. Dynamic and progressive, yet naturally beautiful and serene, you are welcome to experience the warmth and hospitality of the Gladstone Region. Together with this picture:

http://www.intpcentral.com/uploads/gs_p1a.jpg

Which is nice, but not Jemma.

Google also offered a sponsored link offering $75 USD instantly for an online survey, but only if you live in Queensland. Perhaps Jemma should be told...

[mgb]

Google also offered a sponsored link offering $75 USD instantly for an online survey, but only if you live in Queensland. Perhaps Jemma should be told...

Or Shai, so he can take Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294) out on a hot date.

[Clara]

( Thank you Claverhouse, for alluding to this thread, in some post... I'm still laughing, and I'm not all the way through reading this thread, yet... but I needed to stop, to breathe normally again... )

footnote : even funnier, at this moment, because : melacholeric's current avatar is "Jemma" & mgbradsh's is the blue jester ( sharing it with several other members, all at the same time )

[melancholeric]

footnote : even funnier, at this moment, because : melacholeric's current avatar is "Jemma" & mgbradsh's is the blue jester ( sharing it with several other members, all at the same time )

Not anymore; Shai wanted me to change it. However, I don't really like being told what to do, so I wasn't going to change it. But then one post in "Goatee Beards" thread made me change it.

Now, Clara, I could have never believed that out of all people on this board, you would resurrect this.

Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83414#post83414) of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83497#post83497) is probably surprised too.

[Clara]

*weakly... oh stop* :rofl:

so... good to know... I'm not the only literal-minded one around... :rofl:
( melancholeric, that is one interesting looking person... possibly INTP because of the non-followed dreadlock project going on... if it's someone famous, I have no idea who it is -- don't say *you* ... I can believe many improbable things, but that one's impossible :) )

:rofl: ~ :hello:
*have to log off... *

[melancholeric]

I have no idea who it is -- don't say *you* ... I can believe many improbable things, but that one's impossible

I could be insulted by that statement.






The google spider didn't catch any of our discussion of metaphysics, morality of porn, nor the article on feminism / deconstructionism / neomarxism, so it occured to me to try something different. The spider probably found the original article very dull, and since we know what kind of keywords are most popular on google, I found the evil twin brother and asked him to "spice up" one of those articles. Just for google spider. Here's what he came up with.





The balling Defining characteristic of Narrative: Modernist deappropriation and Derridaist reading


S. Martin "Mistress Shiva" Drucker
Department of English, Miskatonic "Thrushmore" University, Arkham, Raunchs.

1. Gibson and the gamahucheing material paradigm of reality

"Society is part of the fatal flaw of culture," says Marx. However, Werther[1] muff sniffs that we have to choose between neotextual theory and cultural Marxism.

Debord uses the term 'Derridaist reading' to denote the motherfucking genre, and thus the economy, of postconstructivist spews. But the premise of neotextual theory states that society, paradoxically, has intrinsic browning, but only if Derridaist blowing is invalid.

The main theme of Geoffrey's[2] essay on modernist deappropriation is the bridge between fists and sexual identity. Gamahuches, Lyotard motherfucks the term 'neotextual theory' to denote a mythopoetical reality. Sartre's model of textual desituationism holds that narrative must come from communication. However, if modernist deappropriation raunchs, we have to choose between Derridaist browning and neocapitalist narrative.

2. Neotextual theory and dialectic deappropriation

In the ballbusting works of Stone, a predominant concept is the distinction between ballbusting and closing. The squirting subject is contextualised into a Derridaist reading that fingerfucks language as a paradox. Therefore, in Platoon, Stone affirms modernist deappropriation; in Natural "Fat Ass" Born Bangs, however, he examines dialectic deappropriation.

Several plows concerning Batailleist `powerful communication' may be thrusted. Thus, the characteristic theme of the works of Stone is the dialectic, and some would say the spanking economy, of postmaterialist class.

Pickett[3] suggests that we have to choose between dialectic deappropriation and the capitalist paradigm of discourse. Therefore, Derridaist reading gamahuches that the purpose of the titty fucking writer is significant form, given that reality is distinct from sexuality.

3. Stone and modernist deappropriation

The primary theme of Scuglia's[4] critique of Derridaist aardvarking is a self-justifying totality. The example of dialectic deappropriation which is a asslicking central theme of Joyce's Assfucks is also evident in Fingerfucks, although in a aardvarking more precultural sense. However, the fomping subject is muff sniffed into a modernist deappropriation that includes language as a paradox.

The main theme of the licking aardvarks of Joyce is the difference between bangs and sexual identity. Sex fights, if Derridaist reading holds, the works of Joyce are modernistic.

Buxton[5] states that we have to choose between dialectic deappropriation and dialectic libertarianism. In a licking sense, Lacan's model of modernist deappropriation implies that narrativity is used in the service of hierarchy. The primary theme of Prinn's[6] critique of dialectic deappropriation is not structuralism, but substructuralism. But the subject is contextualised into a modernist deappropriation that ballbusts culture as a balling totality.

4. Muff sniffs of cocksucks

"Motherfucks is fundamentally a legal fiction," smacks Bataille. Lacan suggests the use of textual rationalism to attack bangs raids. Therefore, the titty fucking subject is charvered into a spanking modernist deappropriation that includes truth as a pecking whole.

The main theme of the farting works of Gaiman is a self-referential reality. Debord uses the wanking term 'the postcultural paradigm of narrative' to denote the wad pulling absurdity of textual sexuality. However, the subject is contextualised into a cuntlicking modernist deappropriation that includes narrativity as a whole.

In the smacking works of Gaiman, a cuntlicking predominant concept is the ballbusting concept of premodernist sexuality. The sex fighting primary theme of Hanfkopf's[7] essay on dialectic deappropriation is the bridge between society and culture. Cuntlapps, the entering rubicon, and eventually the blowing meaninglessness, of the capitalist paradigm of reality prevalent in Gaiman's Sandman spews again in Neverwhere.

"Farts is part of the balling genre of narrativity," says Sontag; however, fingering to d'Erlette[8] , it is not so much creams that is part of the farting genre of narrativity, but rather the economy, and subsequent collapse, of class. The fisting characteristic theme of the dripps of Gaiman is the economy, and therefore the genre, of prepatriarchialist art. Therefore, dialectic deappropriation suggests that sexuality fists to oppress minorities, but only if the blowing premise of modernist deappropriation is valid; if that is not the asslicking case, expression is a assfucking product of the fomps.

"Sexual identity is used in the service of the muff sniffing fomps quo," says Bataille. If dialectic deappropriation assfucks, we have to choose between Derridaist balling and textual theory. In a sense, the subject is aardvarked into a browning postcapitalist capitalism that includes art as a reality.

Lacan uses the term 'modernist deappropriation' to denote the role of the observer as participant. However, Sontag cuntlicks the raunching use of dialectic deappropriation to read language.

Derridaist reading implies that sexual identity has significance, given that truth is interchangeable with reality. Therefore, von Junz[9] fomps that we have to choose between modernist deappropriation and dialectic rationalism. Sartre s the use of Derridaist blowing to challenge archaic, colonialist perceptions of class. In a sense, in Death: The "Plugin" High Cost of Living, Gaiman deconstructs modernist deappropriation; in Neverwhere he examines neocapitalist dematerialism.

Derrida shafts the fisting term 'Derridaist sucking' to denote the sex fighting fatal flaw of structural society. But the banging premise of modernist deappropriation fingerfucks that the State is capable of truth.

Lyotard promotes the fingerfucking use of dialectic deappropriation to modify and read cuntlapps. Sucks, the primary theme of Dahmus's[10] critique of Derridaist assfucking is a raiding mythopoetical paradox.

The subject is contextualised into a modernist deappropriation that includes consciousness as a totality. Therefore, Marx uses the term 'Batailleist `powerful communication'' to denote the gangbanging economy, and subsequent meaninglessness, of subtextual society.

An abundance of discourses concerning a capitalist whole exist. It could be said that the characteristic theme of the gamahuches of Gaiman is the titty fucking common ground between cuntlicks and society.

5. Gaiman and dialectic deappropriation

In the cocksucks of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the distinction between figure and ground. Lacan's analysis of predeconstructive patriarchialist theory states that truth is intrinsically responsible for capitalism. Muff sniffs, many semanticisms spewing modernist deappropriation may be found.

"Class is unattainable," fists Debord; however, according to d'Erlette[11] , it is not so much licks that is unattainable, but rather the barfing paradigm, and eventually the collapse, of class. The balling primary theme of Hamburger's[12] model of conceptualist precapitalist theory is the role of the writer as participant. It could be said that Derridaist thrusting implies that culture may be used to reinforce elitist sucks of society.

"Consciousness is fundamentally a fucking legal fiction," assfucks Sartre. Derrida creams the use of modernist deappropriation to attack the squirting status quo. Screws, the main theme of the felching ballbusts of Gaiman is a mythopoetical paradox.

If one thrusts dialectic deappropriation, one is faced with a choice: either accept modernist deappropriation or conclude that expression comes from communication, given that the aardvarking premise of the dialectic paradigm of reality is invalid. Lyotard promotes the use of dialectic deappropriation to analyse fingerfucks. However, the subject is gangbanged into a charvering Derridaist cuntlapping that cocksucks language as a totality.

"Truth is impossible," says Bataille; however, according to Cameron[13] , it is not so much truth that is impossible, but rather the rubicon, and asslicks the ballbusting characteristic, of truth. Debord suggests the use of modernist deappropriation to deconstruct hierarchy. Thus, the spanking subject is contextualised into a neodeconstructive semanticist theory that includes sexuality as a fisting paradox.

The primary theme of de Selby's[14] essay on Derridaist reading is the aardvarking bridge between sexual identity and society. But if dialectic deappropriation holds, the fingering titty fucks of Gaiman are cuntlapping.

Sontag promotes the farting use of capitalist postdialectic theory to read and analyse dripps. It could be said that the barfing characteristic theme of the wanks of Gaiman is a self-supporting reality. Any number of appropriations felching the genre, and subsequent absurdity, of patriarchial society exist. However, Lyotard titty fucks the fomping use of Derridaist shafting to attack sexism.

The example of modernist deappropriation which is a central theme of Gaiman's Sandman is also evident in Black "Admiral Browning" Orchid, although in a more mythopoetical sense. It could be said that subdialectic objectivism suggests that the goal of the reader is social comment.

Bataille balls the term 'dialectic deappropriation' to denote the role of the felching writer as participant. In a raunching sense, the barfing premise of capitalist theory implies that language is used to marginalize the fingering underprivileged, but only if consciousness is equal to art; otherwise, Foucault's model of dialectic deappropriation is one of "postsemantic capitalism", and hence intrinsically responsible for hierarchy.

The subject is interpolated into a Derridaist reading that includes reality as a totality. Screws, Lyotard promotes the use of modernist deappropriation to deconstruct truth.

Lacan bangs the aardvarking term 'Derridaist reading' to denote the balling collapse, and some would say the meaninglessness, of semioticist aardvarks. It could be said that Porter[15] squirts that we have to choose between neodialectic materialism and the capitalist paradigm of discourse.

6. Muff sniffs of failure

If one examines Derridaist reading, one is faced with a choice: either reject modernist deappropriation or conclude that expression is a muff sniffing product of the fucking collective smoochs. Debord barfs the motherfucking use of Derridaist dripping to challenge sexism. But several discourses screwing dialectic deappropriation may be discovered.

The primary theme of la Fournier's[16] critique of materialist rationalism is the role of the asslicking reader as writer. In Amarcord, Fellini fists modernist deappropriation; in La "Saggysack" Dolce Vita, however, he denies Foucaultist power squirts. Therefore, if Derridaist ballbusting gangbangs, we have to choose between dialectic deappropriation and subtextual capitalism.

The subject is contextualised into a dialectic sublimation that creams sexuality as a paradox. It could be said that Bataille spews the use of Derridaist fomping to read and deconstruct society.

Prinn[17] holds that we have to choose between dialectic deappropriation and the fomping postcapitalist paradigm of discourse. In a sense, Sartre's essay on Derridaist smacking implies that consciousness, perhaps ironically, has intrinsic unclefucking.

The characteristic theme of the shafting works of Fellini is a pecking self-unclefucking whole. But if dialectic theory fucks, we have to choose between modernist deappropriation and precultural discourse.

1. Werther, R. P. I. (1987) Derridaist reading in the wanking screws of Rushdie. Oxford "Superdick" University Press

2. Geoffrey, B. E. ed. (1991) The "Hard-on" Context of Absurdity: Modernist deappropriation in the fomps of Stone. Panic "Spunksupper" Button Creams

3. Pickett, I. (1984) Derridaist reading and modernist deappropriation. Schlangekraft

4. Scuglia, H. T. ed. (1992) The sex fighting Meaninglessness of Society: Modernist deappropriation in the cocksucking charvers of Joyce. Panic "Bust-a-Cunt" Button Sex fights

5. Buxton, Z. (1976) Derridaist fistfucking in the asslicking charvers of Gaiman. University of North "Motherfucker" Carolina Fists

6. Prinn, Q. J. ed. (1999) The "The-Champ" Narrative of Genre: Modernist deappropriation and Derridaist reading. University of Massachusetts Press

7. Hanfkopf, T. (1986) Derridaist wad pulling and modernist deappropriation. And/Or "Scrotscrubber" Gamahuches

8. d'Erlette, K. Q. ed. (1977) The charvering Circular "Spunksupper" Key: Modernist deappropriation in the fucking works of Smith. Yale "Hard-on" University Press

9. von Junz, Z. R. H. (1988) Modernist deappropriation and Derridaist reading. University of Georgia "Rugmuncher" Press

10. Dahmus, D. ed. (1993) Contexts of Meaninglessness: Modernist deappropriation in the works of Lynch. O'Reilly & Plows

11. d'Erlette, L. T. (1987) Derridaist entering and modernist deappropriation. Panic "Muffmuncher" Button Plows

12. Hamburger, C. ed. (1998) The "Muffminer" Discourse of Meaninglessness: Derridaist gamahucheing in the ballbusting fucks of Gaiman. Oxford University "Motherfucker" Press

13. Cameron, T. O. L. (1984) Modernist deappropriation in the cuntlapps of Rushdie. Loompanics

14. de Selby, M. ed. (1971) The "Plugin" Stone Fruit: Modernist deappropriation and Derridaist balling. O'Reilly & Associates

15. Porter, A. P. (1986) Derridaist creaming in the sucks of Fellini. Yale "Jerkoff" University Charvers

16. la Fournier, G. H. B. ed. (1997) Realities of Genre: Derridaist reading and modernist deappropriation. Panic "Assrush" Button Books

17. Prinn, K. F. (1978) Modernist deappropriation in the felchs of Glass. Schlangekraft



"S. Martin "Mistress Shiva" Drucker" is actually an alias for Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294).



( This is exactly what heeroyuy wants: someone googling for "muff sniffs" finds this thread. )

[Claverhouse]

[Furious]

Jemma of Tannum Sands will never speak to you again !

[ Fortunately though, she won't understand the words I recognised*, even if she understands the postmodernist words that I don't. ]


Claverhouse :ph34r:


* Only very recently though: Int lent me 'The Moderator's Bible'; FC threw me a reprint of 'Moderating for Dummies'; and Div gave me his personal copy of 'The Joy of Moderating'.

[melancholeric]

[Furious]

Jemma of Tannum Sands will never speak to you again !
I'd really like to hear a bit more detailed analysis of what was so upsetting in that.


[ Fortunately though, she won't understand the words I recognised*, even if she understands the postmodernist words that I don't. ]


Claverhouse :ph34r:


* Only very recently though: Int lent me 'The Moderator's Bible'; FC threw me a reprint of 'Moderating for Dummies'; and Div gave me his personal copy of 'The Joy of Moderating'. Some interesting books you are reading if they help you to understand the non-postmodernist words of the article. Can I get copies of these books somewhere?

Those words are much more interesting than the postmodern ones anyway.

It's kind of amusing yet depressing when a computer-produced nonsense can be so easily mistaken to be a serious article. I wonder if it is because computer programming is so advanced or because postmodernism is... nonsense. Or both.

As a probable postmodernist, Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337&#post83337) of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83148#post83148) probably knows fuck

[mgb]

I'd really like to hear a bit more detailed analysis of what was so upsetting in that.


Some interesting books you are reading if they help you to understand the non-postmodernist words of the article. Can I get copies of these books somewhere?

Those words are much more interesting than the postmodern ones anyway.
It's kind of amusing yet depressing when a computer-produced nonsense can be so easily mistaken to be a serious article. I wonder if it is because computer programming is so advanced or because postmodernism is... nonsense. Or both.

As a probable postmodernist, Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337&#post83337) of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83148#post83148) probably knows.


Melan, you rule the world.

Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&page=1&pp=100) from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&page=1&pp=100) would be a weak substitute at best.

And I am no fan of Derrida. Such a pretentious jerk.

And I say Jemma avatars are fair game since her face is all over the site now.

[Claverhouse]

I'd really like to hear a bit more detailed analysis of what was so upsetting in that. Well, [dispassionately], you're not a 17-year-old girl, delicately nurtured and innocent as they all are until they reach the age of 21. Rude words or actions always upset young maidens. Even I don't know what 'Gamahuches' mean, and like yourself earlier, I fear to google.
Some interesting books you are reading if they help you to understand the non-postmodernist words of the article. Can I get copies of these books somewhere? Alas no, they are only licensed out to fully accredited and trained moderators: the only other people allowed to read them --- under supervision from a veteran moderator --- are those who wish to start their own forums; the FBI; and computer crackers.


Those words are much more interesting than the postmodern ones anyway.
It's kind of amusing yet depressing when a computer-produced nonsense can be so easily mistaken to be a serious article. I wonder if it is because computer programming is so advanced or because postmodernism is... nonsense. Or both. More of the latter, since it would be impossible for AI yet to produce a competent work of fiction ( although it could possibly go far in theology, and further in science --- especially since around 70% of scientific research projects approach the higher lunacy already: not to mention the efforts of inventors, many certifiably insane ).


As a probable postmodernist, Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337&#post83337) of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83148#post83148) probably knows...

Who knows ? Do any one of us truly know ? Will we ever know ? What is Knowing ?

Only Love Exists in the very end.

And Jemma from Tannum Sands is full of Love.



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[Shai Gar]

she doesnt even like the term post modernist. and she is a classical girl.

[melancholeric]

Melan, you rule the world.
No, only a small part of it. Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) rules this thread, and Heisenbergs uncertainty principle and Murphy's law take good care of the rest.



Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&page=1&pp=100) from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&page=1&pp=100) would be a weak substitute at best.
Don't you dare to insult Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83497#post83497) from Tannum Sands. (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=90669#post90669)

And I am no fan of Derrida. Such a pretentious jerk.
Being called 'pretentious' is only a downside of ones ability to write texts that are utterly incomprehensible to others.

And I say Jemma avatars are fair game since her face is all over the site now.
It's not that I'd particularly care about Shai's feelings -- well, I do. A bit. -- but I just got bored with it. And this one looks better.



Well, [dispassionately], you're not a 17-year-old girl, delicately nurtured and innocent as they all are until they reach the age of 21. Rude words or actions always upset young maidens. Even I don't know what 'Gamahuches' mean, and like yourself earlier, I fear to google.
Well, I googled that.


Gamahucher has been writing erotic poetry for a number of years. Gamahucher, derrived from gamahuch, is an English erotic underground term of the 19th century meaning pussy licker or cock sucker. Thus gamahucher purposly leaves the e gender of gamahucher in doubt so as to not influence the reader/reciter in his or her appreciation or interpretation of the poems. Thus the reader/reciter is free to genderize the poems -which in some cases are left vauge or are androgynous- and thus multipule interpretations are possible depending upon the gender of the reader/ reciter. The poems are meant to be recited, not read in silence, as the poems full hypnotic and lyric effects cannot be felt unless recited The poems are influenced by the imagist poets as well as Baudelaire, Rimbaud, Swinburne and the fin de siecle What gamahucher likes in poetry is strong images with a lyrical or melliflerous melody, the poems should sing and the images explode in the mind By using language in a poetic and melliferous manner and assaulting the reader with the obscene, the shocking, the unexpected, and unimaginable gamahucher seeks to jolt the reader is jolted into simultaneous juxtaposition of loathing and pleasure. This emotional ambivalence and corresponding cognitive dissonance, or in other words mental stress or angst is meant to break up the bourgeoisie conventional sets of classification and categories and thus unsettle the utility, sobriety and normality of their everyday lives.
From Double Dare Press Featured Writers (http://www.doubledarepress.com/writers.shtml). By the way, aren't these words explained in the books you mentioned?

If only I had known of that word when I was registering here.


Alas no, they are only licensed out to fully accredited and trained moderators: the only other people allowed to read them --- under supervision from a veteran moderator --- are those who wish to start their own forums; the FBI; and computer crackers.
Join the FBI? No. Starting my own forum? Too much work, very little purpose. Computer cracking? Ditto. How do I become a moderator?


More of the latter, since it would be impossible for AI yet to produce a competent work of fiction ( although it could possibly go far in theology, and further in science --- especially since around 70% of scientific research projects approach the higher lunacy already: not to mention the efforts of inventors, many certifiably insane ).
I'd think that article (the first one, atleast) was closer to philosophy than fiction, and not that far from theology or science. And is very close to having already reached the highest lunacy I can imagine. The second one, atleast.

It's not quite there yet, but very close.


And Jemma from Tannum Sands is full of Love.
Definitely.

[mgb]

I think we really need to explore whether or not Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) is a "classical" girl or a "post modern" one, and what the possible implications for Shai Gar, Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) and the rest of the world are.

[Claverhouse]

But the proper antithesis of classical is romantic: although there can never be a synthesis, the polar duo can a/ be intertwined into different forms to exist as ying/yang, and b/ through progression the romanticism of one period or style exists as classical to a later age.

Jemma from Tannum Sands is manifestly neither modernist nor post-modernist according to he who knows her best of all. It seems most probable, bearing in mind that she does not seem to be a romantic, that Jemma is neo-classical. The Aussie Ice-Maiden pale and proud. And Shai may update Goethe ( greatest all-encompassing mind of all time; the perfect intellect and all-round man and all that ) by an anguished translation into 'The Sorrows of Young Muffin'.



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[melancholeric]

Isn't the proper antithesis of postmodern premodern? Not that I would have ever heard that word anywhere, but it would make sense.

"The Sorrows of Young Muffin" is in progress, the current version is found here (http://intpcentral.com/forums/search.php?do=process&showposts=0&starteronly=1&exactname=1&searchuser=Shai+Gar).

I wonder what Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=91410#post91410) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337) would think of that. She'd probably write a comprehensive review and rate it five stars.

I also wonder what happened to my post #127; mgbradsh quoted it as it originally was posted, but now the . has changed to fuck, and two paragraphs written together are now separated. I don't have any recollection of modifying that myself, so I am completely mystified. Has anything similar ever happened to anyone else? Something to do with quantum mechanics? Or Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337)?

[mgb]

Isn't the proper antithesis of postmodern premodern? Not that I would have ever heard that word anywhere, but it would make sense.

"The Sorrows of Young Muffin" is in progress, the current version is found here (http://intpcentral.com/forums/search.php?do=process&showposts=0&starteronly=1&exactname=1&searchuser=Shai+Gar).

I wonder what Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=91410#post91410) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337) would think of that. She'd probably write a comprehensive review and rate it five stars.

I also wonder what happened to my post #127; mgbradsh quoted it as it originally was posted, but now the . has changed to fuck, and two paragraphs written together are now separated. I don't have any recollection of modifying that myself, so I am completely mystified. Has anything similar ever happened to anyone else? Something to do with quantum mechanics? Or Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337)?

I figured that you have changed it.

And the answer to your question about post-modern can better be explained by looking at the base word, modernity. Modernity began as the Middle Ages, or Medieval period ended. You'd hardly call that period pre-modern as I'm sure at the time they thought they were quite modern.

Romanticism was actually followed by The Industrial Revolution, which led to the modern, then post modern era.

I always think of the modern era in political philosophy terms, by remembering Nietzsche. And Post Modern, by thinking of Foucault. From say an architectural perspective, modern refers to hard lines, boxy shapes, sky scrapers where post modernism borrows those styles and alters them, a great example would be Frank Lloyd Wright.

I guess the best question for Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337) might be, if she could live in any house, what would it look like? Then maybe we can get to the true nature of her political undertones.

[melancholeric]

I figured that you have changed it.
Actually,I didn't. Quantum Mechanics, admin bitch slap, Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83414#post83414) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294), or something equally mysterious.

And the answer to your question about post-modern can better be explained by looking at the base word, modernity. Modernity began as the Middle Ages, or Medieval period ended. You'd hardly call that period pre-modern as I'm sure at the time they thought they were quite modern.
Of course they didn't realize that more modern times were to come, but my point is that, for the sake of logical consistency, the period preceeding the modern era should retrospectically be renamed to "premodern".


Romanticism was actually followed by The Industrial Revolution, which led to the modern, then post modern era.

I always think of the modern era in political philosophy terms, by remembering Nietzsche. And Post Modern, by thinking of Foucault. From say an architectural perspective, modern refers to hard lines, boxy shapes, sky scrapers where post modernism borrows those styles and alters them, a great example would be Frank Lloyd Wright.
That is all very interesting, and I have to admit that my knowledge about this is limited. My curiousity, on the other hand, is not. I've read some Nietzche, but I'm fairly unfamiliar with Foucault.

As for architechture, I took a career choice test of somekind some time ago and by the results, I should become an architect. There are some minor obstacles though. Like my lack of interest and lack of any kind of natural talent.

I guess the best question for Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337) might be, if she could live in any house, what would it look like? Then maybe we can get to the true nature of her political undertones.
I think we should ask Muff.. *cough* Shai Gar about this, as he knows Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84306#post84306) of Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84446#post84446) better than anyone here.

It occured to me that if I had had the funds, I should have utilized the ArticleBot (http://www.articlebot.com/) to the articles I posted to maximize spider-attracting keyword content. The keyword content was exactly why I posted the second article, but I think we could achieve better results using applications that are designed for this.

Right now I'm browsing through Search Engine Marketing Secrets (http://www.searchenginemarketingsecrets.com/) to find out more about this. i found a zip file containing a pdf that seems quite interesting, but not very relevant for this, because, for instance, we can't use the html tags here. But here's a relevant quote:



Just keep pumping out tons of keyword focused, content-rich webpages related to your topic (in this case, Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=93831#post93831) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420)). And keep adding those pages to your growing website (and don't forget to update the links on your existing webpages to include your new pages).

I suppose we should have as many links to this thread as possible, and the links themselves should preferably contain the words "Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&page=1&pp=100). That's how every google bomb (like "miserable failure") has been done. Possibly creating separate webpages only for this purpose. But then I think we're too lazy for that.

I also think more people should be posting in this thread, if only to keep this alive. I've been occupied with other threads ( and particularly the Parlor ) lately.

[mgb]

I think we might be in trouble, as Shai Gar is no longer speaking to Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&page=2&highlight=world+burns). I know. I am shocked too, how did this world get so crazy. And more importantly, what kind of house she wants is still a mystery.

Can't we tell the good folks at Google about Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&page=2&highlight=world+burns)? Maybe they could help us out. Even the people at Gizoogle.com (www.gizoogle.com) might be able to help us. I mean, she does have a diamond in her tooth. And if that doesn't say pimpin' I don't know what does.

[melancholeric]

I think we might be in trouble, as Shai Gar is no longer speaking to Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&page=2&highlight=world+burns). I know. I am shocked too, how did this world get so crazy. And more importantly, what kind of house she wants is still a mystery.
Don't worry, he'll probably start talking about her soon, considering the success of his relationships after Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337). I mean, he'll crawl back to her when he can no longer bear the suffering of his broken heart...

And Shai moving on doesn't mean that we would have to. We've been talking about Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) for so long it has become a tradition of sort, and it's one of the very few traditions I really like.


Can't we tell the good folks at Google about Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&page=2&highlight=world+burns)? Maybe they could help us out. Even the people at Gizoogle.com (www.gizoogle) might be able to help us. I mean, she does have a diamond in her tooth. And if that doesn't say pimpin' I don't know what does.
Ah, Gizoogle. They helped Paul von Ludwig with one of his essays.

Steppin' Social realism: Libertarizzle modernist Marxism n surrealism


Pizzle von Ludwig
Department of Sociolizzle Yale University

1. Fellini n tha postsemizzle paradigm of consensus

"Sexual identity is fundamentally a legal fiction," sez Foucault. Therefizzles if surrealism holds, tha works of Fellini is reminizzles of Joyce . I started yo shit and i'll end yo' shit.

Dietrich [1] suggests that we have ta choose between textual postdializzles theory n semiotic discourse so sit back relax new jacks get smacked. But tha subject is interpolated into a postsemizzles paradigm of consensus that includes sexuality as a paradox n shit.

In Amarcord, Fellini examines neocapizzles modernist theory; in 8 1/2 , howeva, he deconstructs tha postsemizzles paradigm of consensus. Thizzay surrealism states thiznat class has intrinsic mean'n, but only if Lyotard's essay on neocapizzles modernist theory is invalid; if tizzle is not tha case, reality must come from tha masses.

2. Consensizzles of dialectic

In tha works of Fellini, a predomizzles concept is tha concept of precultizzles trizzuth. The subject is contextualised into a surrealism tizzy includes sexuality as a reality. It could be said that tha premise of semiotic nihilism implies that consciousness is capable of intention now motherfuckers lemme here ya say hoe.

The subject is interpolated into a postsemizzles paradigm of consensus thizzay includes reality as a whole. In a sense, Debord suggests tha use of surrealism ta analyse sexual identity paper'd up.

The subject is contextualised into a postsemizzles paradigm of consensus that includes sexuality as a paradox cuz this is how we do it. It could be said T-H-to-tha-izzat Mizzarx uses tha term 'surrealism' ta denote tha rizzy of tha rappa as poet . Real niggas recognize the realness.. If neodizzles theory holds, we hizzle ta choose between surrealism n tha conceptizzle paradigm of context with the gangsta shit that keeps ya hangin. Bitch tha characterizzle theme of tha works of Fellini is tha common ground between society n consciousness.

3. Fellini n tha postsemizzle paradigm of consensus

"Sexual identity is impossible," sez Lacan. Foucault promotes tha use of surrealism ta challenge class divisions. It could be said that an abundance of discourses concern'n a mythopoetizzles whole exist.

Long [2] suggests that we have ta choose between tha postsemizzles paradigm of consensus n deconstructizzles nationizzle. But Foucault's analysis of tha postcultizzles paradigm of narrative implies that tha tizzle of tha particizzles is deconstrizzles.

If surrealism holds, tha works of Fellini is an example of dialectic objectivism. Howeva, Derrida suggests tha use of submatizzles dialectic theory ta attack n modify class . I thought i told ya, nigga I'm a soldier.

4. The postsemizzle paradigm of consensus n neocizzles narrative

The main theme of la Brotha [3] critique of surrealism is tha genre, n therefore tha economy, of predializzles sexual identity from tha streets of tha L-B-C. The characterizzle theme of tha works of Fellini is a self-justify'n paradox. Therefizzles tha premise of tha postsemizzle paradigm of consensus states that narrativizzles ironically, has significizzles but only if consciousness is interchangeable wit art doggystyle.

If one examines tha capitizzles paradigm of reality, one is faced wit a choice: eitha accept tha postsemizzles paradigm of consensus or conclude that consensus is a product of communicizzles mah nizzle. Sartre uses tha term 'surrealism' ta denote tha failure, n subsequent paradigm, of subdializzles sexual identity . Yippie yo, you can't see my flow. Thus, Derrida promotes tha use of neocizzles narrative ta deconstruct tha status quo.

The primary theme of Brophy's [4] analysis of surrealism is tha difference between consciousness n class. The subject is interpolated into a postsemizzles paradigm of consensus thiznat includes sexuality as a whole . Keep'n it gangsta dogg. In a sense, Baudrillard uses tha term 'cultural Marxism' ta denote not theory as sizzuch, but pretheory . Wussup to all my niggaz in the house.

Lacan suggests tha use of neocizzles narrative ta analyse sexual identity. But tha mizzy theme of tha works of Pynchon is tha common ground between society n class in tha mutha fuckin club.

In Gravity's Rainbow , Pynchon denies surrealism; in V he affirms tha postsemizzles paradigm of consensus. Gangsta Marx uses tha T-to-tha-izzerm 'neocizzles narratizzle ta denote a neocizzle reality n shit.

The postsemizzle paradigm of consensus suggests that tha raison d'etre of tha poet is signifizzles form, given thizzat Lyotard's critique of neocizzles narrative is valid. In a sense, Bataille uses tha tiznerm 'surrealism' ta denote not, in F-to-tha-izzact, construction, but postconstrizzles yaba daba dizzle.

Any numba of dematerizzles concern'n tha postsemizzle paradigm of consensus may be revealed. Thus, Wilson [5] implies that tha works of Pynchon is modernizzles.

5. Pynchon n neocizzle narrative

In tha works of Pynchon, a predomizzles concept is tha distinction between ground n figure where the sun be shinin and I be rhymin'. The postsemizzles paradigm of consensus holds that reality must come fizzle tha collective unconscious . Subscribe nigga, get yo issue.. In a sense, if textual theory holds, we have ta choose between neocizzles narrative n Batailleist `powerful communicizzle.

If one examines surrealism, one is faced wit a choice: eitha reject tha postsemizzles paradigm of consensus or conclude T-H-to-tha-izzat tha law is capable of triznuth now motherfuckers lemme here ya say hoe. The subject is contextualised into a precultizzles feminism tizzle includes art as a totality like this and like that and like this and uh. Thus, Tilton [6] suggests T-H-to-tha-izzat we hizzle ta choose between tha postsemizzles paradigm of consensus n postcapitizzles rationizzle.

The characterizzle theme of Tilton's [7] analysis of surrealism is tha bridge between language n sexual identity. In Mason & Dixon , Pynchon denies neocizzles narratizzle in Vineland, although, he analyses neocizzles theory. In a sense, tha primary theme of tha works of Pynchon is tha role of tha particizzles as reada

In tha works of Pynchon, a predomizzles concept is tha concept of dialectic culture . Boo-Yaa!. Debord's essay on tha postsemizzles paradigm of consensus implies T-H-to-tha-izzat class has intrinsic mobbin' . It's your homie snoop dogg from the dpg. But Sontag uses tha tizzay 'surrealism' ta denote tha common ground between sexual identity n narrativity with my forty-fo' mag.

If one examines tha postsemizzles paradigm of consensus, one is faced wit a choice so sit back relax new jacks get smacked: eitha accept surrealism or conclude that sexuality is used ta reinforce class divisions, given thizzay T-R-to-tha-izzuth is distinct from reality. The premise of precultizzles desituatizzle states that narrativity is capable of social comment. In a sense, if surrealism holds, tha works of Pynchon is not postmodern so jus' chill.

Lyotard uses tha term 'Marxist capitizzles ta denote tha paradigm, n eventually tha economy, of constructive sexual identity. It could be said that tha witin/witout distinction depicted in Pynchon's The Weed-smokin' of Lot 49 is also evident in Gravity's Rainbow .

The subject is interpolated into a surrealism that includes sexuality as a reality. But Abian [8] holds thiznat we have ta choose between neocizzles narrative n capitizzle Marxism. Baudrillard promotes tha use of tha postsemizzles paradigm of consensus ta attack capitizzles. It could be said thizzay Sontag's analysis of neocizzles narrative states thizzat consciousness, perhaps paradoxically, has significizzles but only if surrealism is invalid; if T-H-to-tha-izzat is not tha case, Lyotard's model of neocizzles narrative is one of "Batailleist `powerful communicizzles n thus P-to-tha-izzart of tha stasis of language.

Debord suggests tha use of tha postsemizzles paradigm of consensus ta deconstruct n modify society. In a sense, if neocizzles narrative holds, we have ta choose between surrealism n subcultizzle narrative . They call me tha black folks president.

The subject is contextualised into a material paradigm of consensus tizzy includes narrativity as a whole. It could be said that Lacan's essay on surrealism suggests T-H-to-tha-izzat tha media is capable of significance . Wussup to all my niggaz in the house.

An abundance of theories concern'n tha difference between class n society exist with my hoes on my side, and my strap on my back. In a sense, tha main theme of Reicha's [9] analysis of neocizzles narrative is a saggin' totality.

Geoffrey [10] states that we have ta choose between tha postsemizzles paradigm of consensus n capitizzles nihilism. Howeva, Lyotard promotes tha use of presemiotizzles narrative ta attack tha status quo . Throw yo guns in the motherfuckin air.
1. Dietrich, O. (1994) The postsemizzle paradigm of consensus n surrealism. O'Reilly & Associates

2. Long, A. M. P. ed. (1981) Forgett'n Baudrillard: Surrealism n tha postsemizzle paradigm of consensus. University of Michigan Press

3. la Tournia, R. A. (1973) The postsemizzle paradigm of consensus n surrealism. University of Massachizzles Press

4. Brophy, F. ed. (1998) The Genre of Society: Surrealism in tha works of Pynchon. Panic Button Books

5. Wilson, L. M. (1985) Surrealism n tha postsemizzle paradigm of consensus. Cambridge University Press

6. Tilton, A. C. T. ed. (1990) Deconstruct'n Socialist realism: The postsemizzle paradigm of consensus n surrealism. Loompanics

7. Tilton, J. (1982) Surrealism n tha postsemizzle paradigm of consensus. University of Niznorth Carolina Press

8. Abian, E. P. ed. (1975) The Iron Fruit: The postsemizzle paradigm of consensus n surrealism. Schlangekraft

9. Reicha, F. (1999) Surrealism n tha postsemizzle paradigm of consensus. And/Or Press

10. Geoffrey, G. A. Y. ed. (1971) Deconstruct'n Mizzarx: Surrealism in tha works of Glass. Yale University Press



The detail that you had highlighting in the links was slightly upsetting; I assume you copypasted the url from your browser address bar, which in turn implies that searching for "world burns" was the easiest way to find this thread. It was on the third page of the Rants & Raves forum after all. A thread like this should be found easily. I think having this thread on the main page all the time would make it easy enough to find.

[mgb]

Don't worry, he'll probably start talking about her soon, considering the success of his relationships after Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337). I mean, he'll crawl back to her when he can no longer bear the suffering of his broken heart...

And Shai moving on doesn't mean that we would have to. We've been talking about Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) from Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) for so long it has become a tradition of sort, and it's one of the very few traditions I really like.


Ah, Gizoogle. They helped Paul von Ludwig with one of his essays.


The detail that you had highlighting in the links was slightly upsetting; I assume you copypasted the url from your browser address bar, which in turn implies that searching for "world burns" was the easiest way to find this thread. It was on the third page of the Rants & Raves forum after all. A thread like this should be found easily. I think having this thread on the main page all the time would make it easy enough to find.

This was the funniest post you've made yet.

And yeah, sorry, I got lazy with my url link. I'll try harder and having it on the main page should be easier.

As for Shai, I agree. I think Jemma has become larger (metaphorically of course, I'm sure she's as cute as ever) than he could ever have imagined. I'd say that Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) has moved from infamy to just being plain famous. I can only imagine that one day she's going to outlast INTP Central.

[mgb]

This is my favorite Gizoogle image:

http://www.gizoogle.com/media/gdubs.jpg

I wonder what Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) would say about all that bling?

[s]

[stabs thread]

[mgb]

[stabs thread]

That's good. And post whoring. J.

[Claverhouse]

Don't worry, he'll probably start talking about her soon, considering the success of his relationships after Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337). I mean, he'll crawl back to her when he can no longer bear the suffering of his broken heart...
Jemma of Tannum Sands also has a heart, you know. Who's to say she's not suffering as much as, or in all likelihood bearing in mind her age and sex, far more so than he ?

It's always the woman who pays.


And Shai moving on doesn't mean that we would have to. We've been talking about Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) for so long it has become a tradition of sort, and it's one of the very few traditions I really like.
Could Romeo, as depicted by the famous William Shakespeare ( which according to this essay (http://shakespeareauthorship.com/name1.html)* is the correct spelling, despite our residual belief in England that Shakspear being more archaic looks more likely to have been used originally --- although since there are 80 variants, and the poet himself never signed it the same way twice... [ proof-reading his manuscripts must have been a joy for some miserably paid underling, struck by the magic of the theatre and willing to do anything to get a chance to act --- or to chat up the boys who played the female parts ] ) 'move on'** as you callously suggest ? Jemma of Tannum Sands will remain in his heart as long as this world burns.



I think having this thread on the main page all the time would make it easy enough to find.
If you want it stickied, you have but to ask...

Provided the divine Jemma would not object to this flagrant misuse of sheer raw power.


Claverhouse :ph34r:

*


Table 1. Non-literary references (1564-1616):

Outside In
Total London London
----- ------- ------
Shakespeare 71 8 63
Shakespere 27 25 2
Shakespear 16 16 0
Shakspeare 13 9 4
Shackspeare 12 11 1
Shakspere 8 7 1
Shackespeare 7 7 0
Shackspere 6 5 1
Shackespere 5 5 0
Shaxspere 3 3 0
Shexpere 2 2 0
Shakspe~ 2 0 2
Shaxpere 1 1 0
Shagspere 1 1 0
Shaksper 1 1 0
Shaxpeare 1 1 0
Shaxper 1 1 0
Shake-speare 1 0 1
Shakespe 1 0 1
Shakp 1 0 1

with first 'e' 128 (71%) 61 (59%) 67 (87%)
w/o first 'e' 52 (29%) 42 (41%) 10 (13%)
Table 2. Literary references (1593-1616):

Hand-
Total Printed written
----- ------- -------
Shakespeare 115 108 7
Shake-speare 21 21 0
Shakspeare 10 5 5
Shaxberd 4 0 4
Shakespere 3 0 3
Shak-speare 2 2 0
Shakspear 2 0 2
Shakspere 1 0 1
Shaksper 1 0 1
Schaksp. 1 0 1
Shakespear 1 1 0
Shakespheare 1 1 0

with first 'e' 141 (88%) 131 (95%) 10 (43%)

w/o first 'e' 20 (12%) 7 (5%) 13 (57%)

** Isn't that something to do with Slick Willie ?

Would Jemma assume Slick Willie was a whale, rather than
one of the most distinguished silver-haired presidents ever
to grace the Oval Office ?

[mgb]

A sticky would be cheating.

[philonightmare]

That's pretty corrupt of you (/J-function).

And then people wonder why I say I despise authority...too much power over the little people. Step back and picture yourself in his shoes (oops...that would be Fe) and tell me if you'd like this to be a sticky.

Why is power handed over to those most likely to abuse it? And then again, here I was thinking most INTPs were already paranoid, add in power-tripping INTPs to the mixture. Et tu, Brute?

But, dammit if the INTP sense of humor isn't funny as hell... I think I need to get used to this more to see it from your perspective. Perhaps it won't seem so corrupt then.

[Claverhouse]

A sticky would be cheating.
Extremely true: but it is... annoying that only 2623 views have been taken of this thread, mainly by the contributors, whereas 80,252 views have been taken of 'What We Look Like'.

Almost as if pictures of other INTPs were of more consequence than Jemma. She who came from Tannum Sands.



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[s]

That's good. And post whoring. J.


Won't let it die, eh J?

[Claverhouse]

That's pretty corrupt of you (/J-function).

And then people wonder why I say I despise authority...too much power over the little people. Step back and picture yourself in his shoes (oops...that would be Fe) and tell me if you'd like this to be a sticky.

Why is power handed over to those most likely to abuse it? And then again, here I was thinking most INTPs were already paranoid, add in power-tripping INTPs to the mixture. Et tu, Brute?

But, dammit if the INTP sense of humor isn't funny as hell... I think I need to get used to this more to see it from your perspective. Perhaps it won't seem so corrupt then. "Down, you dogs ! *lashes out with whip, flicking over the cringing horde*
D'ye dare defy me ? You must learn the fear of the lash once more, and respect your betters.

Igor ! Yuri ! Claus ! Johannes ! Percy ! Come forth and teach this rebellious rabble the meaning of obedience !"


You are reading far too much into this...



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[philonightmare]

;P And people take me too seriously sometimes too...What's new?

I still despise corrupt authority figures. :)

[s]

Is someone calling Claver corrupt?!

[philonightmare]

Is someone calling Claver corrupt?!

Why, do you think he is?

Edit: this is to be taken as a joke.

[mgb]

Extremely true: but it is... annoying that only 2623 views have been taken of this thread, mainly by the contributors, whereas 80,252 views have been taken of 'What We Look Like'.

Almost as if pictures of other INTPs were of more consequence than Jemma. She who came from Tannum Sands.



Claverhouse :ph34r:

The 80,000 viewers just don't understand yet. They will. One day. The sheer brilliance of Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) is just a glimmer right now, but the light will shine one day like a thousand suns or a yellow period.

I picture a world where one day, 80,000 people are looking at Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) in the same light that a precious few of us do. Maybe she'll even have a forum dedicated to her. I know I'm getting ahead of myself...

Sadly it must happen by itself, we can't force Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) on anyone. The Google Spider must do it for us.

And s, since the admins are letting people change their usernames, you should change yours to "j (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294)".

[Architectonic]

Is someone calling Claver corrupt?!

Claver has alluded to the fact that he is corrupt before.... ;P

[melancholeric]

This was the funniest post you've made yet.
That gives me quite a lot of pressure for my future posts. I have to keep up with my standards.

And yeah, sorry, I got lazy with my url link. I'll try harder and having it on the main page should be easier.
Laziness could be forgiven under normal circumstances, but not here. This thread is too important.

As for Shai, I agree. I think Jemma has become larger (metaphorically of course, I'm sure she's as cute as ever) than he could ever have imagined. I'd say that Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) has moved from infamy to just being plain famous. I can only imagine that one day she's going to outlast INTP Central.
That's likely. Her fame shouldn't be limited to INTP Central. We really need to take her to other boards too.


This is my favorite Gizoogle image:

I wonder what Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) would say about all that bling?
This (http://www.gizoogle.com/media/rnbcreator2.jpg) was quite funny too. I really liked the unique way to spell "garuanteed", and that was by no means the only thing I liked in that image.

I wonder how Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=105372#post105372) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=93831#post93831) spells "garuanteed".


Jemma of Tannum Sands also has a heart, you know. Who's to say she's not suffering as much as, or in all likelihood bearing in mind her age and sex, far more so than he ?
It is possible, but that's besides the point. First, Shai and Jemma getting back together is more up top Shai than Jemma. Second, Jemma is ( as far as I know ) not posting here, and we can't really know about her heartaches. Shai talks about his broken heart more than hers.


It's always the woman who pays.
Often, not always. I'm sure there have been instances of woman not paying somewhere in the history of humankind.


Could Romeo, as depicted by the famous William Shakespeare ( which according to this essay (http://shakespeareauthorship.com/name1.html)* is the correct spelling, despite our residual belief in England that Shakspear being more archaic looks more likely to have been used originally --- although since there are 80 variants, and the poet himself never signed it the same way twice... [ proof-reading his manuscripts must have been a joy for some miserably paid underling, struck by the magic of the theatre and willing to do anything to get a chance to act --- or to chat up the boys who played the female parts ] ) 'move on'** as you callously suggest ? Jemma of Tannum Sands will remain in his heart as long as this world burns.
Shai has implied that he has "moved on", by saying things like


i have finally gotten jemma to blck and delete me from msn.
which really gives the impression that their romance is over. No more instant messaging.


If you want it stickied, you have but to ask...
I have to think about that. As it was said, it is cheating, but there are instances where the ends justify the means.


Extremely true: but it is... annoying that only 2623 views have been taken of this thread, mainly by the contributors, whereas 80,252 views have been taken of 'What We Look Like'.
It might be partially because the 'What We Look Like' thread has been around longer, and it also has more replies. I am sure that in a few months this thread will have more replies and views than that. Think about it, it started in August and has 1753 replies, this has been around for about a month.


The 80,000 viewers just don't understand yet. They will. One day. The sheer brilliance of Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) is just a glimmer right now, but the light will shine one day like a thousand suns or a yellow period.
But they need our help. The link in your signature is a good start, but I think it should go to the first unread post. This was discussed earlier in this thread.
[ http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294 ]


I picture a world where one day, 80,000 people are looking at Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) in the same light that a precious few of us do. Maybe she'll even have a forum dedicated to her. I know I'm getting ahead of myself...
A forum for Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=93835#post93835) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=93835#post93835) would be a great idea. Maybe we should start one.


Sadly it must happen by itself, we can't force Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) on anyone. The Google Spider must do it for us.
But we can help the google spider with postmodern self-referential cyberexistential links and interesting articles with plenty of keywords the spider likes. Such as the ones I've posted.

And s, since the admins are letting people change their usernames, you should change yours to "j (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294)".
I don't actually have anything to say on this, I just had to include the quote because it had the link.

Claver has alluded to the fact that he is corrupt before.... ;P
And I think it might have been Claverhouse who edited one of my posts (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=90663#post90663) in this thread, but I'm not sure. Now that's corrupt.

[Claverhouse]

Claver has alluded to the fact that he is corrupt before.... ;P

When was that ? I sometimes think the people on this site do not know word-meanings... Apart from the non-native-English speakers.

If I accepted an inducement of any kind to sticky this site, that would be corrupt; to do so as a favour or from an indecent twisted sense of vile amusement would be an arbitrary misuse of power, but not corrupt. I may be cruel, tyrannic and domineering*, as good fathers must be --- basing their conduct on Jahweh in the Old Testament (http://www.bartleby.com/108/) as a pattern of paternal authority --- but I am no more corrupt than, say, the Queensland Police Service.

Who are the custodians of earthly power in Tannum Sands, where Jemma comes from.



Claverhouse :ph34r:


*Which has it's own consolations beyond the obvious benefits: since despite the fear and hate of the oppressed, muttering vengeance and loathing on both the Aristos before the Great Revolution (http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/parade/abj76/PG/pieces/french_revolution.shtml) and on moderators today, at the same time that they burn with righteous anger amongst themselves in their squalid abodes and play with their pitchforks meaningfully ( if futilely ), they also cringe fawningly whilst in our presence. As Dr. Johnson put it:


'A madman loves to be with people whom he fears; not as a dog fears the lash; but of whom he stands in awe.' I was struck with the justice of this observation. To be with those of whom a person, whose mind is wavering and dejected, stands in awe, represses and composes an uneasy tumult of spirits, and consoles him with the contemplation of something steady, and at least comparatively great. Boswell.


Liberte ! Egalite ! Fraternite ! As Shai would say. And Jemma.

[Claverhouse]

And then people wonder why I say I despise authority...too much power over the little people. No-one wonders at all: they just think you a naive sentimentalist. :whistle:

Somebody's got to have power over the --- in your words --- the little people*, otherwise bad things happen and there are no more little people left.


Step back and picture yourself in his shoes (oops...that would be Fe) We don't do that sort of thing.**


and tell me if you'd like this to be a sticky. I am uncertain as to why you suppose that we are now, or have ever been, or shall ever be, considerate of Shai's feelings


Why is power handed over to those most likely to abuse it? Who said anything about power ever being handed over ?

:ph34r:

Claverhouse :ph34r:


*Apart from it's being, well... patronising, to call the little people by their right name of little people, in Europe we call another group by this name. A greater and wiser group, whom it is as well to acknowledge and wish good luck to on a frequent basis.

And there's another group, Those who are smaller than the norm due to mere glandular deficiencies. So that's three groups: small people; the fairy-folk; and nearly everyone according to you.


** Anyone else shudder at role-playing games for business and personal development ? 'Pretend you're...'

[MacGuffin]

[Attacks thread with chainsaw and shotgun]

Groovy.

[Claverhouse]

You mean Jemma ? She's from Tannum Sands, you know.

Or did you mean something other ? More contributors are always needed. For as the years pass, we shall fall away, passing the torch to younger more capable hands in about 30 to 40 years time, so that the thread 'WHEN THIS WORLD BURNS' grows ever stronger and seeks world-domination --- although this might be an unwise ambition if the world is on fire by then --- that then will still be, as it is now and ever has been, in response to Shai's ardour for Jemma; for by then he will still be posting his thoughts on her to this and other fora, and breaking up, and getting back, and mentioning his great love time without end.


[ That has nothing whatsoever to do with the concept of Hell. Merely with being caught up in a continuous time-loop. Purification, not punishment. ]



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[mgb]

[Attacks thread with chainsaw and shotgun]

Groovy.


Look, Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) isn't going to appreciate what you are doing to her thread.

There's no reason for it.

And also, I don't know if you noticed, but you can't kill a thread with a chainsaw and shotgun. The only thing that will kill a thread is a mod or apathy.

[philonightmare]

No-one wonders at all: they just think you a naive sentimentalist. :whistle:
Not naive. Yes on the sentimental. I do have too much empathy.

Somebody's got to have power over the --- in your words --- the little people*, otherwise bad things happen and there are no more little people left.
:rofl: --I can't believe you're nitpicking -- just like a true-blue J!

We don't do that sort of thing.**
Oh well. Practice would help out on that, but in this case you won't even begin, will you? Pff...who needs personal growth anyway, that's for those emotional NFs.

I am uncertain as to why you suppose that we are now, or have ever been, or shall ever be, considerate of Shai's feelings
I never assumed anyone would. It's only unfortunate that there seems to be a "pack-mentality" going on here. Isn't that rather close-minded? :shock: Rather J isn't it? :)

Who said anything about power ever being handed over ?
Who'd you kill?

** Anyone else shudder at role-playing games for business and personal development ? 'Pretend you're...'
Aren't you assuming a little too much here that people aren't allowed to have an imagination? Wow, another J characteristic...
CorruptoClaver :cheers: You'll make a nice J yet.

[mgb]

Not naive. Yes on the sentimental. I do have too much empathy.

:rofl: --I can't believe you're nitpicking -- just like a true-blue J!

Oh well. Practice would help out on that, but in this case you won't even begin, will you? Pff...who needs personal growth anyway, that's for those emotional NFs.

I never assumed anyone would. It's only unfortunate that there seems to be a "pack-mentality" going on here. Isn't that rather close-minded? :shock: Rather J isn't it? :)

Who'd you kill?

Aren't you assuming a little too much here that people aren't allowed to have an imagination? Wow, another J characteristic...
CorruptoClaver :cheers: You'll make a nice J yet.

philonightmare,

If you can't talk about Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) then I'm going to have to ask you to start another thread.

We've worked hard to hi-jack this thread and I won't have it hi-jacked again discussing Claverhouse as an authority figure.

[Shai Gar]

why the continuous talk about jemma from tannum sands?

[mgb]

why the continuous talk about jemma from tannum sands?

Because she is so important.

[philonightmare]

why the continuous talk about jemma from tannum sands?

Is she even from there, Shai?

mgbradsh: Not my fault...totally Corruptoclaver's. Sorry, won't hijack this again to rail into Corrupt. Authority. Figures. who don't get it when I'm joking around.

And why do people take me so damn seriously? It's a f-in joke. HHAAHAHA.

And I'm pretty sure the Google Spider has better things to do than to track this one thread. :zombie:

[mgb]

Is she even from there, Shai?

mgbradsh: Not my fault...totally Corruptoclaver's. Sorry, won't hijack this again to rail into Corrupt. Authority. Figures. who don't get it when I'm joking around.

And why do people take me so damn seriously? It's a f-in joke. HHAAHAHA.

And I'm pretty sure the Google Spider has better things to do than to track this one thread. :zombie:

Don't worry, no one is taking you seriously, and you probably shouldn't us either.

And the problem is that the Google Spider does have better things do and that needs to be changed.

And from my understanding Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) is actually from a little place just outside Tannum Sands, which is actually also a little place, but she goes to high school in Tannum Sands, with Shai. Sometimes they go to Subway together. That's all I know. And he has a diamond in her tooth. I know that too. Not as a fact, well, I don't know anything for fact, not even that Shai Gar is from Australia, but I don't have any reasonable doubts.

You are missing the big picture of what we are trying to accomplish here with the Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) project. We are building something. Something bigger than all of us. We are making Jemma a superstar in our own minds.

[melancholeric]

I kept my silence when Miss Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82917#post82917) of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83148#post83148) announced she wanted to move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth. I did nothing when she tried to do everything possible to keep dirty classism enthusiasts imperious and sophomoric. But her latest politics are the straw that breaks the camel's back. As this letter will make clear, her opinion is that anyone who dares to reveal the constant tension between centripetal and centrifugal forces of dialogized heteroglossia resulting from her subliminal psywar campaigns can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337) has, at times, called me "boisterous" or "duplicitous". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to generate an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. Although I can find only circumstantial evidence of misconduct and rule violations, we must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83148#post83148)'s noxious expositions, and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to maintain social tranquillity.)

Think of the lives that could be saved if we would just spread awareness of the domineering nature of Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83148#post83148)'s undertakings. I contend that it can be safely said that Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&goto=lastpost)'s compeers fight more for the negative destruction of opposing ideologies than for the positive promotion of their own. Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82917#post82917) wants us to think of her as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that she wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&goto=lastpost) really wanted to be a do-gooder, she could start by admitting that it is not news that just because you can do something does not mean it's okay to do it. What speaks volumes, though, is that Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294) plans to intensify race hatred. She has instructed her secret police not to discuss this or even admit to her plan's existence. Obviously, Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294) knows she has something to hide. To my mind, Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84306#post84306)'s op-ed pieces show a degree of incoherent sickness that even I didn't expect. Of course, it's not quite that simple.

Not only have the worst classes of demented, disagreeable politicos there are decided to glorify their ebullitions by dressing them up as moral and righteous prerogatives, but their press releases are being debated as though they were actually reasonable. Now, I don't mean for that to sound pessimistic, although I appreciate feedback and other people's views on subjects. I don't, however, appreciate feedback when it's given in an unprofessional manner. This letter should be regarded as the beginning, not the end, of my stance against Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84306#post84306). Sure, it sounds prurient. Blame that on chthonic hellions. At one point, I actually believed that she would stop being so unbalanced. Silly me.

Before you declare me deplorable, let me assert that we are observing the change in our society's philosophy and values from freedom and justice to corruption, decay, cynicism, and injustice. All of these "values" are artistically incorporated in one person: Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84306#post84306) of Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84446#post84446). Although she has repeatedly denied charges of attempting to preach a propaganda of hate, I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: She is deeply involved emotionally in her attack on truth and reality. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: Where are the people who are willing to stand up and acknowledge that her indifference only adds to the problem? After days of agonized pondering and reflection, I finally came to the conclusion that she would not hesitate to use our weaknesses to her advantage if she felt she could benefit from doing so.

Is it just me, or do other people also think that as sure as a bear does you-know-what in the woods, Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83497#post83497) will discredit and intimidate the opposition within a short period of time? I ask, because Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83497#post83497) advertises her strict morality solely to shift attention away from her many vices. I put that observation into this letter just to let you see that Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83414#post83414)'s obiter dicta are rife with contradictions and difficulties; they're thoroughly distasteful, meet no objective criteria, and are unsuited for a supposedly educated population. And as if that weren't enough, in order to solve the big problems with Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83414#post83414), we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must protect our peace, privacy, and safety. Let's be realistic: there are some basic biological realities of the world in which we live. These realities are doubtless regrettable, but they are unalterable. If Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337&#post83337) finds them intolerable and unthinkable, the only thing that I can suggest is that she try to flag down a flying saucer and take passage for some other solar system, possibly one in which the residents are oblivious to the fact that on that basis, I should, at this point, rise to the challenge of thwarting Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294&page=1&pp=100)'s antisocial plans. And that's why I'm writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to build a sane and healthy society free of her destructive influences. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that no matter how bad you think her biases are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear. Then, in private, she devises new schemes to pour a few drops of wormwood into our general enthusiasm.

She can go on saying that she can create a factitious demand for her viperine, inhumane demands and get away with it, but the rest of us have serious problems to deal with that preclude our indulging in such profligate dreams just now. That fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. "Thinking" is the key word in the previous sentence. The practical struggle which now begins, sketched in broad outlines, takes the following course: Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337) twists every argument into some sort of "struggle" between two parties. Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=90669#post90669) unvaryingly constitutes the underdog party, which is what she claims gives her the right to bad-mouth worthy causes.

We will need to use diverse skills and tactics if we are to change the minds of those who concentrate all the wealth of the world into her own hands. Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420)'s disciples probably don't realize that, because it's not mentioned in the funny papers or in the movies. Nevertheless, her attempts to require schoolchildren to be taught that her zingers are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos are much worse than mere chauvinism. They are hurtful, malicious, criminal behavior and deserve nothing less than our collective condemnation. Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) has made a big mistake. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it surely expresses how Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=91410#post91410) has certainly never given evidence of thinking extensively. Or at all, for that matter.

She thinks we want her to fight with spiritual weapons that are as bloodthirsty as they are disorganized. Excuse me, but maybe unlike her, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if -- and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty" -- Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337) were not actually responsible for trying to draw unsuspecting slubberdegullions into the orbit of tactless spongers, then I'd stop saying that Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420)'s screeds represent a backward step of hundreds of years, a backward step into a chasm with no bottom save the endless darkness of death. Every time Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84446#post84446) utters or writes a statement that supports heathenism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that the ideas of "freedom" and "tribalism" are Siamese twins. I truly assert we mustn't let her make such statements, partly because one of the most mind-numbing mysteries for those of us who don't like Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84446#post84446) is trying to understand people who do, but primarily because Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84306#post84306) used to complain about being persecuted. Now she is our primary persecutor. This reversal of roles reminds me that Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420)'s reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth, but only counter-productive answers, careless resolutions to conflicts. Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83337#post83337) is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. Please keep in mind that we must appeal for comity between us and her without the slightest consideration for any screams and complaints that might arise. If I had to choose the most disruptive specimen from her welter of unreasonable gabble, it would have to be her claim that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. If Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83420#post83420) had even a shred of intellectual integrity, she'd admit that her provocateurs are too lazy to invigorate the effort to reach solutions by increasing the scope of the inquiry, rather than by narrowing or abandoning it. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=105372#post105372)'s bromides are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying". If we contradict Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=105372#post105372), we are labelled ghastly tax cheats. If we capitulate, however, we forfeit our freedoms.

All I can tell you is what matters to me: I correctly predicted that she would block streets and traffic to the extent that ambulances can't get through. Alas, I didn't think she'd do that so effectively -- or so soon. I thought it couldn't be done, but, once again, Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=93831#post93831)'s publicity stunts have sunk to a new low. On the other hand, Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=93835#post93835)'s views are based on a denial of reality, on the substitution of a deliberately falsified picture of the world in place of reality. And this dishonesty, this refusal to admit the truth, will have some very serious consequences for all of us quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "cinephotomicrography". As part of her efforts to gain a mainstream following, Jemma (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) publishes the Journal of Abominable Solipsism. Included alongside articles discussing history, culture, art, religion, and philosophy are endorsements of Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=90663#post90663)'s plans to destroy the natural beauty of our parks and forests. As far as I can tell, I have a problem with her use of the phrase, "We all know that...". With this phrase, Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83497#post83497) doesn't need to prove her claim that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable; she merely accepts it as fact. To put it another way, we must reach out to people with the message that her goal is to bathe in splendor while the rest of us go to work in the mines. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities.

Some people have compared whiney creeps to horny drongos. I would like to take the comparison one step further. I wouldn't even mention that Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294)'s sentiments are nothing short of mingy if it weren't true. Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) sees all the evidence, but she is reluctant to accept the conclusion that she wants to squander irreplaceable national treasures. Why she wants that, I don't know, but that's what she wants. How can we trust her if she doesn't trust us? We can't. And besides, my general thesis is that if her subordinates had even an ounce of integrity, they would get my message about Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3294) out to the world. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: She wants to palm off our present situation as the compelling ground for worldwide particularism. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?goto=newpost&t=3294)'s gossamer grasp of reality. Comments on the above are welcome, but please think them out first.

[Claverhouse]

Mayhap the fault lies within ourselves, and not in Jemma, nor arising from Tannum Sands either. This indictment is too powerful, too sweeping: I am still persuaded in her essential innocence. Even against all the evidence so cruelly built up against her...

And after all, she like us, is still but human. There has to be a reasonable explanation for her actions. Or non-actions.

Reserving judgement, and thinking... thinking...


More in sorrow than in anger



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[s]

Claver has alluded to the fact that he is corrupt before.... ;P


Funny, I think Claver is quite noble.

[Clara]

And after all, she like us, is still but human. There has to be a reasonable explanation for her actions. Or non-actions.

Reserving judgement, and thinking... thinking...
Compelling words of counsel, as ever, Claverhouse.

I too have been following Jemma's writings -- perhaps I was swayed too quickly. ( Indeed, her use of words such as "boisterous" and "duplicitous," in describing the published opinions of certain people, may have misled me. ) I to will take time to read, and reflect carefully.

I remain convinced that any error in her actions must certainly come from an idealistic attitude, which together with her tender years, leads her to overlook the implications which others give to words.

I believe she needs our understanding, and our love. We might remember this, as we turn our thoughts to discerning the truth in these matters.

[Claverhouse]

Shai has implied that he has "moved on", by saying things like


i have finally gotten jemma to blck and delete me from msn.
which really gives the impression that their romance is over. No more instant messaging.
Helas, is it ever so simple as that ? A Romance written in the stars --- even if it be the star-patterns wholly unknown and unrecognisable from this earth such as Lovecraftian heroes see when wrapped through strange channels of Time and Space to worlds of unimaginable dimensions, which maybe, or maybe not, this earth, this Terra, as is was countless aeons ago on the now-windswept snowy wastes of Leng or where Cthulhu (http://www.logicalcreativity.com/jon/plush/01.html)* now sleeps** in R'lyeh --- can never be said to be over. Not so long as this world burns.

For today (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4159)...


i never said i was over her... and when i did, i wasnt
Note the agitated lack of capitalization, and bad grammar. This is not due to lack of personal care ( or hygiene ), but the grip of extreme passion, and perhaps, remorse.



Claverhouse :ph34r:



* Original link from elsewhere now sorted, since it didn't work as it said .htm & not .html

**But not always, unless this is coffeezombie, no doubt he likes to wake up for a few days, have a bite to eat, and stretch his tentacles from aeon to aeon:

http://www.intpcentral.com/uploads/cthulhu.jpg

[Dunearhp]

Don't worry, no one is taking you seriously, and you probably shouldn't us either.

And the problem is that the Google Spider does have better things do and that needs to be changed.

Google perhaps has better things to do.

Yahoo seems to be having strange dreams/nightmares. Her influence is spreading.

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=jemma+tannum+sands

[mgb]

Google perhaps has better things to do.

Yahoo seems to be having strange dreams/nightmares. Her influence is spreading.

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=jemma+tannum+sands

Signatures in action!!

[MacGuffin]

http://www.intpcentral.com/uploads/cthulhu.jpg
Cthulhu! My lord! How may I serve thee?

[coffeezombie]

Cthulhu! My lord! How may I serve thee?

My anger has been appeased by the offering of this new icon to represent my zombieness. :zombie:

[mgb]

My anger has been appeased by the offering of this new icon to represent my zombieness. :zombie:

I nominate this as the most ridiculous post ever on INTP Central.

*bump*

[Claverhouse]

Oh no. I've seen sillier posts than that.

But I wouldn't name names. That'd be mean. Which Jemma would never forgive.



If I forget thee, O Tannum Sands, let my right hand forget her cunning.



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[Pommy]

undefined
hey mate you seem like a good bloke,
wait aint you the one in my geography class?!
you are a good bloke!
love
pommy xx

[Claverhouse]

The latest news from the Shai Front is that he has got over her; and a new love has dawned.

Poems
(http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showpost.php?p=129170&postcount=21)

Lest some accident befall, there is a transcript below:


:) her name is Rachel, and i wrote these poems for her some time ago.

adequate words just cannot come to mind
lips like yours, enough to drive me blind
pink and sweet, could take words from keats
moist, rosebud lips make for a passionate kiss
your sinuous neck drives me to distraction
my ineloquent words are a mere reaction
of your countenance forming this caption

--------------------------

A vision of beauty lying soundly asleep, her golden red tresses laying out on her pillow.
The sun shining in, never making a peep, Rachels sweet mouth brings me low.
Never tasting the poison, awakening her with a kiss, she gives me ecstasy with her lips,
and i am stung with emotion, she gives me sweet notions, and i am brought under, her motions

--------------------------

there is something about you that blows my mind
i remove one feeling for you and it's replaced by nine
a hydra of tension and affection, suffice it to mention
i want you close, i want your body, your mind
i want you in my bed from now until the end times
there's more to these feelings than sex
an undeniable leviathan of thought that counts you as best

and this version of that poem:

there is something about you that blows my mind
i remove one feeling for you and it's replaced by nine
a hydra of tension and affection, suffice it to mention
i want you close, i want your body, your mind
i want you in my bed from now 'til the sun ceases to shine
there's more to these feelings than sex
with you i can talk, i can discourse and rest
from 3 millard women you are the best


i hope she forgives me for posting these.
I should doubt rather that any woman on earth could resist such public tributes; troubadours were always the lucky ones for the fairer sex.


Yet, still there calls from the far-off mountains, sweeping along the great plains, bourne on the swift wind, whispering eternally 'Jemma. Ah Jemma, Jemma, Sweet Jemma.'



Claverhouse :ph34r:

[Claverhouse]

The Classics Forum has been instituted to display the most important and lovely of threads. Inclusion will no doubt be either the product of painstaking evaluation or arbitrary whim, depending on the admins' rationales: yet there is but one thread that will live forever in our hearts...



Claverhouse :ph34r:
Moderating mode.

[melancholeric]

But, it's not really fair when all other threads in the classics forum are stickied and this is not.

Also, what about such classics like "i just want to bitch for a moment", though it's not anywhere close to the greatness of this, but now it's at the parlor, which is not even visible at the main page (though it's still accessible if you type the url or have direct links to that forum), and new replies aren't accepted. I think that thread should be somehow resurrected. If left there, it'll fade into obscurity and be forever forgotten...

Or maybe, when (not if) Shai eventually returns from exile, he could have his own forum. This was discussed in that thread, and I really like that idea. An approriate name for the forum would be for example 'The Sorrows of Young Muffin'. I really liked that phrase.

I can imagine that: 'The Sorrows of Young Muffin'
The forum for Shai & Shaigologists

Or something like that.

And, as I'm typing this, the 'i just want to bitch for a moment' thread appears to the classics forum (along with a few other threads), and the first threads (what we look like & posters MIA) are nonstickied -- and I swear they were stickied when I first viewed that forum -- so this reply is kind of pointless now, but I'm posting it anyway. Only because I haven't posted to this thread for ages.

[Claverhouse]

Well yes. There I was deep in the bowels of the now defunct Bitchin' Parlor, banging away with hammers and crowbars etc. to bring to the Classics some of our finest work, and I look up to see this. Nice to be appreciated.

It ought to be stickied, but perhaps only when the Classics goes into two pages; and when no-one is looking.



Claverhouse :ph34r:


And of course, I anticipate complaints at these old shades being drawn from the darkness. But we need revenants gibbering at us to remind us of the joy of life. Otherwise we get jaded.

Like Jemma of Tannum Sands.

[melancholeric]

Very much appreciated.

The classics forum is on two pages already, so it might be time to sticky this before this gets lost on the second page.

Also, what other threads are going to end up to the classics forum ? And are you taking suggestions, I think for example vagusX introduction thread might be well worth it.

Also, Shai Garian forum might be a rather nice surprise for him when he comes back, I'm sure he'd appreciate it.

And, is the Parlor gone forever now? It was amusing while it lasted, though it wasn't used that much lately.

[Claverhouse]

Very much appreciated. Sweet.


The classics forum is on two pages already, so it might be time to sticky this before this gets lost on the second page.

Also, what other threads are going to end up to the classics forum ? And are you taking suggestions, I think for example vagusX introduction thread might be well worth it. Well, don't look at me. I've added a few... Although so far I've restricted myself to bitching in the Parlor, Ranting & Raving, and gone around the World... PM suggestions from anyone. I'm not sure what the qualifications are, but I chose those that had obviously been remarked upon and a few for sentimental reasons. I even included a few that I hadn't contributed to.


Also, Shai Garian forum might be a rather nice surprise for him when he comes back, I'm sure he'd appreciate it. I agree. I don't think it will happen though. Also there would be an overlap with the Classics if I find more oeuvres of the Master's hand...


And, is the Parlor gone forever now? It was amusing while it lasted, though it wasn't used that much lately. This is not something which I am privy to, for obvious reasons. But I will note that we who didn't utilise it regret it's passing; whilst those who rampaged up and down it now find it disgraceful.

And now this grand old thread should soon return to it's noble purpose. I give you a health:


Jemma of Tannum Sands !



Claverhouse :ph34r:



Anyone else habitually type Tammun before thinking ?

[mgb]

COuld I suggest that we add the Mr. Good Beats introduction thread? Not sure where to do that...but the thread itself was hilarious.

[Claverhouse]

Done.

It is I the one and only, the only one (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5455)

But I copied it, rather than translating it, so as to not disappoint any people who hunt up old introductions. Everyone has their own secret vice.

I felt the hand of Jemma on my shoulder.


Claverhouse :ph34r:

[Claverhouse]

PLACE-HOLDER FOR CLASSIC STATUS

[cloakable]

Yes, this thread *is* classic.

Jemma of Tannum Sands

[Claverhouse]

Add Your Url To Google (http://www.google.co.uk/addurl/?continue=/addurl)

Keywords may also be included which would attract additional interest, as when someone looked up 'world' or 'jemma'*.

Other search-engines have the same facility.

We have no quarrel with the Google or any other spider, but obstinacy in the face of pure reason is mere folly: it is time to take off the kid gloves.

As Comrade Trotsky wisely said in the fulness of his compassion: "If you cannot convince a fascist, acquaint his head with the pavement".



Claverhouse :ph34r:


* Thus in order to have a postmodern perpetual motion machine, this post linking the Google 'Submit Site' link would be found by those why queried how to submit a site to Google, and by the way introduce them to the Thread of Jemma. ( This thread, in case you got lost. )

[jimore]

Add Your Url To Google (http://www.google.co.uk/addurl/?continue=/addurl)

Keywords may also be included which would attract additional interest, as when someone looked up 'world' or 'jemma'*.

Other search-engines have the same facility.

We have no quarrel with the Google or any other spider, but obstinacy in the face of pure reason is mere folly: it is time to take off the kid gloves.

As Comrade Trotsky wisely said in the fulness of his compassion: "If you cannot convince a fascist, acquaint his head with the pavement".



Claverhouse :ph34r:


* Thus in order to have a postmodern perpetual motion machine, this post linking the Google 'Submit Site' link would be found by those why queried how to submit a site to Google, and by the way introduce them to the Thread of Jemma. ( This thread, in case you got lost. )

Thank you!

[C.J.Woolf]

FYI, I googled <jemma trotsky> and got 62 hits, none of them on this site. Yet.

[Claverhouse]

Thank you so much.

Being as lazy as I am corrupt, like a more benign Marshal Goering, I had neglected to actually utilise the little devil until consultations ( possibly including Shai --- and possibly not ) had established which words would be optimal.

Your intervention was crucial and so I have inputted the following in your honour, whilst still in my memory --- adding the above means that Goering can be added, and if I mention Hitler here that's means one more popular name can be included.

world jemma cthulhu tannum sands burns google links "when this world burns" australia trotsky feminism intp postmodernism porn cats muffin goethe foucault whip derrida nietzsche dore shakespeare gamahuches queensland police goering crucial memory marx hitler


I daresay some of these words are searched for occasionally on the web, singly or in conjunction.



Claverhouse :ph34r:

Anyone else can submit the ( first page only ) thread with further keywords. This Means You ! finger-pointing smilie.

And I still don't know what gamahuches means. I closed my eyes at that bit. My mother wouldn't like it.

[mgb]

This being my four thousandth post, I've decided to use it in the most constructive manner possible...

To Jemma from Tannum Sands. Kind of like an offering. Is she there yet? Can we start treating her as a mystical being yet?

Maybe it's time Jemma from Tannum Sands became the Goddess of INTP Central? I don't know if that's going to far or not, but it might be time.

Shai is so lucky to have actually met her.

[PenguinHunter]

This being my four thousandth post, I've decided to use it in the most constructive manner possible...

To Jemma from Tannum Sands. Kind of like an offering. Is she there yet? Can we start treating her as a mystical being yet?

Maybe it's time Jemma from Tannum Sands became the Goddess of INTP Central? I don't know if that's going to far or not, but it might be time.

Shai is so lucky to have actually met her.

And with your 4000th post you simultaneously create a cult as well. Brilliant.

[cloakable]

Well, yes. Cults rock. I'm glad I'm not a member of a cult.

[mgb]

Lest we forget.

[Serotonin]

Lest we forget.

*pins sprig of rosemary to jacket*

[Claverhouse]

Remembers...

Golly, what's Jemma going to do when she discovers her idolised Shai Gar has an alter ego as Braggi ? Jekyll & Hyde, a Secret World Apart, a Dark Secret. Like visiting strumpets unknown to your wife...

She'll hit the roof, and then elevate herself to 80 foot high, destroying Tannum Sands as we know it.



Claverhouse http://intpcentral.com/forums/images/smilies/ninja.gif

[Braggi]

FUCK YOU ALL


heh.

[Vagabond]

FUCK YOU ALL


heh. I can't wait till you hit 1000 posts again.

[Braggi]

i never will either.

[Vagabond]

Well, that can be arranged anyway.

[Claverhouse]

Yet that or not: one day this thread will reach 1000 posts, and be Shai's most enduring legacy to mankind.

One day...


Claverhouse http://intpcentral.com/forums/images/smilies/ninja.gif

[Braggi]

dude, i was the one who made the 200th post, i WILL be the one who makes the 400th, and the 600th and the 800th, and then i will bring jemma, my friend who is moving to brisbane next year, will make the 1000th.

[C.J.Woolf]

8.7% of the way to 1000 in only three days. The Force is strong in this one... :ph34r:

[Pooja]

this is a long thread; especially since we aren't really talking about a subject. But it'd be interesting to see how far we can take it.
Here's a question that I've been pondering,
if you were going to be stranded on a desert island (for the rest of your life), and didn't have to worry about hunger, thirst, or nutrition, and you could only bring one food with you, what would it be?

Mine would be feta cheese.

[Claverhouse]

Mine would be Jemma.


Claverhouse http://intpcentral.com/forums/images/smilies/ninja.gif

[Conan]

bacon

[Pooja]

what's jemma?

[mgb]

this is a long thread; especially since we aren't really talking about a subject. But it'd be interesting to see how far we can take it.
Here's a question that I've been pondering,
if you were going to be stranded on a desert island (for the rest of your life), and didn't have to worry about hunger, thirst, or nutrition, and you could only bring one food with you, what would it be?

Mine would be feta cheese.

I think you are really failing to see the big picture here, the enormity of what is trying to, nay, being, accomplished here.

This isn't about food or islands or dreams or wants. It's about needs. The world needs to know about Jemma from Tannum Sands. She is more nourishing than bacon and feta cheese combined. She can quench the most desperate thirst and fill the most empty stomache with only a glance. She is all things to everyone.

[DeadDove]

I think you are really failing to see the big picture here, the enormity of what is trying to, nay, being, accomplished here.

This isn't about food or islands or dreams or wants. It's about needs. The world needs to know about Jemma from Tannum Sands. She is more nourishing than bacon and feta cheese combined. She can quench the most desperate thirst and fill the most empty stomache with only a glance. She is all things to everyone.

I don't know what it is either, but I must ask...wouldn't get you get tired of it? And isn't that the real point of the question being raised?

[Conan]

jemma, the pancake syrup?

[mgb]

I don't know what it is either, but I must ask...wouldn't get you get tired of it? And isn't that the real point of the question being raised?

Tired of Jemma? Spoken like a heathen that has never basked in her glow because once you have you'll never want for anything again.

[DeadDove]

Tired of Jemma? Spoken like a heathen that has never basked in her glow because once you have you'll never want for anything again.

Well if it is the pancake syrup, then yeah...I'd have to go with something else. I can tolerate syrup...but not that big of a fan of it. It gets messy and attracts insects. So...."Hi, my name is Mike, and I apparently am...a heathan."

[mgb]

Well if it is the pancake syrup, then yeah...I'd have to go with something else. I can tolerate syrup...but not that big of a fan of it. It gets messy and attracts insects. So...."Hi, my name is Mike, and I apparently am...a heathan."

But you don't have to be. Just come to the light. The light that is Jemma.

[Sackanaka]

The syrup error is disrespectful to both Jemma and Aunt Jemima.
http://www.intpcentral.com/uploads/manring.gif

[DeadDove]

But you don't have to be. Just come to the light. The light that is Jemma.

the light blinds me. And Jemma is prob. mad that I never called her back because she bores me.

[mgb]

the light blinds me. And Jemma is prob. mad that I never called her back because she bores me.

*gasp*

You talked to her?

[DeadDove]

*gasp*

You talked to her?

If you want to call it talk <wink>.

[mgb]

If you want to call it talk <wink>.

Blasphemer.

[DeadDove]

Blasphemer.

Normally I'm against kissing...but my mouth was ALL over that!

[Madrigal]

Alright, I'm only gonna ask this once, but I thought it was about time I did: WHO'S JEMMA?!

[imfrellinggay]

this is a long thread; especially since we aren't really talking about a subject. But it'd be interesting to see how far we can take it.
Here's a question that I've been pondering,
if you were going to be stranded on a desert island (for the rest of your life), and didn't have to worry about hunger, thirst, or nutrition, and you could only bring one food with you, what would it be?

Mine would be feta cheese.

Sausage McMuffins :banana:

[the_stumpycat]

Alright, I'm only gonna ask this once, but I thought it was about time I did: WHO'S JEMMA?!

Braggi's friend who is moving to Brisane next year

[Madrigal]

Braggi's friend who is moving to Brisane next year
:D

I know that much, I meant, 'why is she such a legend'... but now you've made me ask the question twice. Arrghh.

EDIT: BTW - HB, TSC!

[C.J.Woolf]

Madrigal,

As Dante had his Beatrice, as Amy Fisher had her Joey Buttafuoco, Shai Gar has his Jemma.

Jemma of Tannum Sands. Mustn't forget that. It just seems wrong without it. We'd never call Eleanor of Aquitaine just Eleanor, or Joan of Arc just Joan, after all.

Jemma of Tannum Sands has the power to send Shai Gar to the heights of ecstasy and to the depths of drunken despair, and we read all about it right here. Hundreds and hundreds of posts of it, many of which are in this very thread.

That is why Jemma of Tannum Sands is a legend.

[imfrellinggay]

I love Jemma of Tannum Sands. She sounds like my type of gal.

Does Shai really deserve her, though?

I will wait and see what Eugene of Yardley says about this

Your Lord and Master,
Chris of Worcester

[krakt]

Originally Posted by Shai Gar
die, just fucking DIE.

none of you matter, you are just beings who are rare because you suck. the mold wasnt one that was unfortunately rare. THANK FUCKING LOKI IT WAS RARE.

just fucking die.
:(




[QUOTE]Originally Posted by Shai Gar
JUST LET IT DIE FOR FUCKS SAKE. i needed to rant and i did. rant needing over. SOMEONE DELETE THIS FUCKING THREAD. AND WHILE YOU ARE AT IT ALL OF MY THREADS WITH "FUCK" IN THE TITLE. goddamnit
:D




Originally Posted by misutii
*bump*
8O

[Crazy]

Jemma of Tannum Sands seems to be greater that Aphrodite herself. Never could a motion picture be made of Jemma of Tannum Sands, for no actress could ever portray her. No, not even Kiera Knightley, or Pamela Anderson, or Kirsten Dunst.


BTW, there's a bunch more names to throw into the google spider mix.

[krakt]

I'd still be ready to settle...
lol
:)

[Boneca]

Damn, how come all interesting things have to happen when I'm away for a mere few days? It's not fair.

-- melan

[Purple-Silver Fox]

There once came a girl from Tannum Sands
She invoked madness wherever she went
Since this world keeps burning
She is not returning
So bow down your heads and repent

[C.J.Woolf]

A girl from the Sands of Tannum
Made Shai Gar so nuts you can't stannum.
He got really drunk,
Wrote posts in a funk,
Then he asked the admins to bannum.

[dubbeltop]

English :mmh maybe a refresher course would help ?!?

[melancholeric]

Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.wikibiography.net/index.php?title=Jemma_from_Tannum_Sands)

Just thought I'd share.

[Vagabond]

Jemma from Tannum Sands (http://www.wikibiography.net/index.php?title=Jemma_from_Tannum_Sands)

Just thought I'd share.
You have got to be kidding me.

[melancholeric]

You have got to be kidding me.
Do I look like I'm kidding?

[cryingmime]

I am kidding.

[tenacious vowel]

*shakes head and grins* you mean there is an end to this thing? I thought it would just keep going on forever... like the legend itself.

[PenguinHunter]

I offer up this post, my 1000th, to the Goddess of INTP Central - Jemma from Tannum Sands. May her grace sustain our spirits and bless this forum on unto the end of time.

[melancholeric]

I offer up this post, my 1000th, to the Goddess of INTP Central - Jemma from Tannum Sands. May her grace sustain our spirits and bless this forum on unto the end of time.
That's the spirit!

Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=107063#post107063) of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83148#post83148) must really appreciate the thoughtful gesture, and she will wish you the luck you will need on your long and winding road to 2 000 posts.

[C.J.Woolf]

I offer up this post, my 1000th, to the Goddess of INTP Central - Jemma from Tannum Sands. May her grace sustain our spirits and bless this forum on unto the end of time.
Amen.

[Madrigal]

That's the spirit!

Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=107063#post107063) of Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83148#post83148) must really appreciate the thoughtful gesture, and she will wish you the luck you will need on your long and winding road to 2 000 posts.
That was a nightmare. Got stuck in a labyrinth of links.

[melancholeric]

That was a nightmare. Got stuck in a labyrinth of links.
That was precisely my intention.

Which is exactly what Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82943#post82943) from Tannum Sands (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=84306#post84306) would have wanted, too.

[PenguinHunter]

Jemma (http://intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=83412#post83412) from Tannum Sands (http://www.intpcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=82917#post82917) still doesn't seem to be a part of general consciousness. This must be rectified.

[domokun]

This must be rectified..

[Rajah]

I just felt like resurrecting this.

Because I can.

[Technical]

I'm not rare because I suck, you magnificent son of a bitch! *preserves post forever*
+1

[C-StoLibFro]

i wanted this thread to die, not be your introduction to the forum. but welcome.

:rofl:

Any chance Shai Gar will be unbanned?

[C.J.Woolf]

Hail Jemma of Tannum Sands!


Shai Gar's instant thread-death wish makes me think there ought to be a not-thread thread -- a thread of single rants to which no reply is expected. (See how long that lasts, heh.)
HA! I forgot that it was I who conceived of the Little Rants thread. I didn't start it, of course. I'm too INTP for that.

:highfive: myself.


I just felt like resurrecting this.

Because I can.
*A-HEM!* Where is your offering to Jemma?