PDA

View Full Version : JD Salinger dies at 91.



nonperson
28 Jan 2010, 10:14 PM
On the wire everywhere. Apart from here.

Eye-In-TiPi
28 Jan 2010, 10:42 PM
Mother fucking shit!?! I KNEW HE WAS A PHONIE!!!11! I saw him in a bar the other day and the way he held his cigarette made me wonder if he was a flit, so I called one of my friends from a payphone in the bar and asked him to come down there and help me decide whether he was a flit or not. We couldn't figure it out so I just got drunk but I kept my eye on him. I passed out and now I don't know where my car keys are. I think I'll call my little sister. She always knows just what to do.


Do you think he was a flit?



Oh, and may he rest in peace. I loved Catcher in the Rye.

Polemarch
28 Jan 2010, 10:44 PM
I did not realize he was still among the living.

Are any of us really living? Just thinking about this man makes me feel disillusioned.

kuranes
28 Jan 2010, 10:56 PM
Salinger was, of course, notoriously reclusive. I had heard that an ex-wife of his was coming out with a book that would be more revelatory of him than anything previously issued, and I assumed that he'd be against that. Looks like his objections won't be a problem anymore. I enjoyed the "catcher" book, in its day, and I liked some of his short stories even better. "The Laughing Man" from the collection "9 Stories" was a small masterpiece.

Ferrus
28 Jan 2010, 10:58 PM
Salinger was, of course, notoriously reclusive.
Although not to Pynchon levels I presume?

BAJ
28 Jan 2010, 11:10 PM
Banana Fish!

Once they go down the hole they can't get back out.

foodeater
29 Jan 2010, 02:26 AM
Now he'll never be on the Colbert Report..

Jynweythek
29 Jan 2010, 03:09 AM
I prefer to think JD Salinger has just decided to become extra reclusive.

http://twitter.com/hodgman/status/8333444700

teleforce
29 Jan 2010, 03:14 AM
catcher in the rye: the movie

Alfredo
29 Jan 2010, 03:59 AM
Although not to Pynchon levels I presume?

You presume correctly

starjots
29 Jan 2010, 07:36 AM
So, is Catcher in the Rye worth reading if you are way way past the angst-ridden teenage years?

And, one of the articles said his daughter claimed he drank his own urine. I don't know about you, but when I die, I sure as hell hope one of my kids doesn't leak :) that sort of information in the obituary.

pioneer_167
29 Jan 2010, 08:50 PM
I did not realize he was still among the living.

I also did not realize this. I liked Catcher in the Rye a hell of a lot more than the other crap we had to read in high school. Suffice it to say, The Great Gatsby wasn't that great at all.

Ferrus
29 Jan 2010, 08:53 PM
Reading an obit today where they mentioned the strong possibility of a trove of unpublished writings coming out during probate of will.

nonperson
29 Jan 2010, 08:55 PM
I also did not realize this. I liked Catcher in the Rye a hell of a lot more than the other crap we had to read in high school. Suffice it to say, The Great Gatsby wasn't that great at all.

Set texts for high school literature classes are underwhelming usually.

1104
29 Jan 2010, 08:56 PM
things feel the same.

zago
29 Jan 2010, 09:50 PM
I'm coincidentally reading Catcher right now.

outmywindow
29 Jan 2010, 09:55 PM
Although not to Pynchon levels I presume?
Salinger's reclusion* reportedly included such pleasantries as drinking his own urine. As far as I know, Pynchon just wants to stay out of the limelight, not turn into Howard Hughes like Salinger.




*not a word?

Ferrus
29 Jan 2010, 09:57 PM
Salinger's reclusion* reportedly included such pleasantries as drinking his own urine. As far as I know, Pynchon just wants to stay out of the limelight, not turn into Howard Hughes like Salinger.




*not a word?
Oh, I see. Well what I read of Salinger was that he just didn't do interviews or accept offers to make films of his work. My impression of Pynchon was probably unduly influenced by the episodes of the Simpsons where he wears a paper bag on his head.

Oh and I would've said reclusiveness. But that would be because I have no ear for cadence, rhytmn or indeed pitch.

Stryfe
29 Jan 2010, 10:15 PM
I'm coincidentally reading Catcher right now.I went to a bookstore near my work a couple weeks ago to pick it up having not been made to read it in high school. The bookstore did not have a copy despite the clerk's best efforts to find one. Can you really call it a bookstore if they don't have a copy of Catcher in the Rye???

outmywindow
29 Jan 2010, 10:17 PM
Oh and I would've said reclusiveness. But that would be because I have no ear for cadence, rhytmn or indeed pitch.
Eh, seclusion --> reclusion should work in my mind because of seclusive --> reclusive. Also, there's the validity of both exclusion and exclusive (my knowledge of Latin grammar is a little rusty, but I can think of no reason that the prefix would affect which parts of speech could exist for each infinitive). However, Firefox seems to disagree.

Although oh! the Oxford English Dictionary has just vindicated me, and there's nothing that book doesn't know. Thanks, OED.

Ferrus
29 Jan 2010, 10:29 PM
Although oh! the Oxford English Dictionary has just vindicated me, and there's nothing that book doesn't know. Thanks, OED.
The dictionary I use says that both adjectives are acceptable.