PDA

View Full Version : J Crew: petition site regarding Animal Torture for fur



Claverhouse
11 Nov 2005, 03:47 AM
Just found: J. Cruel (http://www.jcruel.com/index1.asp?c=sup1026), a site devoted to informing the world of the retailers J. Crew's sourcing of animal materials from China, where as usual they treat the cats and dogs as they have always done.

There's a petition to sign. And videos to see.


Even our veteran investigators were horrified at what they found: Millions of dogs and cats in China are being bludgeoned, hanged, bled to death, and strangled with wire nooses so that their fur can be turned into trim and trinkets. This fur is often deliberately mislabeled as fur from other species and is exported to the United States to be sold to unsuspecting customers in retail stores. All of J.Crew's fur is imported from China, which means that shopping there potentially supports the hideously cruel dog and cat fur industry. PETA has pleaded to meet with J.Crew CEO Millard Drexler, begging him to consider the plight of animals being tortured and killed in unthinkable ways overseas; yet our pleas, and the animals' cries, have met with silence and inaction. The bottom line is, because dog and cat fur is so often mislabeled, if you're buying fur from J.Crew or from any other retailer, there's no way to tell whose skin you're wearing.

PETA went into an animal market in Southern China and found cats and dogs languishing in tiny cages, visibly exhausted. Some had been on the road for days, transported in flimsy wire-mesh cages with no food or water. Twenty cats were forced into a single cage. Because of the cross-country transport in such deplorable conditions, our investigators saw dead cats on top of the cages, dying cats and dogs inside the cages, and dogs and cats with open wounds. Some animals were lethargic or frightened, and others were fighting with each other, driven insane from confinement and exposure. Up to 8,000 animals are loaded onto each truck, with cages stacked one on top of the other. Cages containing live animals are commonly tossed from the top of the trucks onto the ground 10 feet below, shattering the legs of the animals inside them. Many of the animals we saw still had collars on, a sign that they were someone's beloved companions, stolen to be made into fur coats.


http://www.intpcentral.com/uploads/180-dogcaged.jpg

http://www.intpcentral.com/uploads/365-why.jpg

http://www.intpcentral.com/uploads/hanging-rabbit.jpg


Claverhouse http://intpcentral.com/forums/images/smilies/ninja.gif

Helios
11 Nov 2005, 03:55 AM
So fucking stupid and gross! You know I am not vegan, I guess there could be a need to wear fur. But pointless cruelty and disrespect for life is disgusting!





...from China, where as usual they treat the cats and dogs as they have always done.







ok, that was funny :P

Lee
11 Nov 2005, 03:56 AM
Yes, J. Crew should stamp down on this. Toture is a complete waste of time and resources, completely inneficient, a quick and painless kill would be much smarter from a business perspective. It no doubt has a knock on effect of driving up the price of fur overseas to an unnecessary level. I think J. Crew should jump on this problem immediately, or else their competitors will capitalize on the failure.

http://forums.intpcentral.com/images/smilies/ninja.gif

kuranes
11 Nov 2005, 04:01 AM
Yes, J. Crew should stamp down on this. Toture is a complete waste of time and resources, completely inneficient, a quick and painless kill would be much smarter from a business perspective. It no doubt has a knock on effect of driving up the price of fur overseas to an unnecessary level. I think J. Crew should jump on this problem immediately, or else their competitors will capitalize on the failure.

http://forums.intpcentral.com/images/smilies/ninja.gif

Yes, these torturers . . .completely inefficient. We should slash their throats instead, the idiots!

Helios
11 Nov 2005, 04:03 AM
Yes, J. Crew should stamp down on this. Toture is a complete waste of time and resources, completely inneficient, a quick and painless kill would be much smarter from a business perspective.


I agree, so ok, ya gonna kill something. Fine, just have a reason and be clean about it. Otherwise leave it the fuck alone. Pointless death to so wasteful, as is pointless pain and suffering.


God my Fe must be going 'cause this is really making me mad!! :rant:

Lee
11 Nov 2005, 04:05 AM
I agree, so ok, ya gonna kill something. Fine, just have a reason and be clean about it. Otherwise leave it the fuck alone. Pointless death to so wasteful, as is pointless pain and suffering.

God my Fe must be going 'cause this is really making me mad!! :rant:Heh, don't worry, it makes me feel the same way inside.

kuranes
11 Nov 2005, 04:08 AM
Heh, don't worry, it makes me feel the same way inside.

I figured. Just kidding there Chess.

Lee
11 Nov 2005, 04:12 AM
I figured. Just kidding there Chess.You were just kidding? or I was just kidding?

I certainly was being serious in both cases, it's just one of those serious cases is not very palatable.

kuranes
11 Nov 2005, 04:15 AM
Gah! I meant . . oh, fageddabottit.

Lee
11 Nov 2005, 04:25 AM
Gah! I meant . . oh, fageddabottit.I know what you meant :P

nottaprettygal
11 Nov 2005, 04:42 AM
Ay...bloody animals belong in the mature thread


...or on my plate.