<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[INTP Central - Technology, Computers, & Gadgets]]></title>
		<link>http://forums.intpcentral.com/</link>
		<description>Computers and technology discussions.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:33:43 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Programming for newb</title>
			<link>http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42790&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:15:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[So I am going to have a lot of free time the next couple months. I am thinking about a career switch to programming from Accounting/Finance. I'm thinking I'll start with python or vb and work my way towards php. I've got some basic html.  
 
 
 
Realistically, how fast could I be marketable if I am...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>So I am going to have a lot of free time the next couple months. I am thinking about a career switch to programming from Accounting/Finance. I'm thinking I'll start with python or vb and work my way towards php. I've got some basic html. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Realistically, how fast could I be marketable if I am starting from scratch, even if it is only 30k-35k/year?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.intpcentral.com/forumdisplay.php?f=18"><![CDATA[Technology, Computers, & Gadgets]]></category>
			<dc:creator>avolkiteshvara</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42790</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>run any app off a USB drive?</title>
			<link>http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42751&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:53:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hey, guys, do you have the experience of running your daily used apps off a USB drive? 
Which is I am now trying to do. But I find that only portable apps can be run like that.  
while some apps like MS office are not portably available. How can I do that?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hey, guys, do you have the experience of running your daily used apps off a USB drive?<br />
Which is I am now trying to do. But I find that only portable apps can be run like that. <br />
while some apps like MS office are not portably available. How can I do that?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.intpcentral.com/forumdisplay.php?f=18"><![CDATA[Technology, Computers, & Gadgets]]></category>
			<dc:creator>wonkotheinsane</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42751</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Linux is for bitches and dumb ones at that</title>
			<link>http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42732&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 21:40:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The latest example of why Linux is for  mentally retarded chimpanzees who ate too many lead paint chips as babies : 
 
 
---Quote (Originally by TheRegister.co.uk)--- 
By Dan Goodin in San Francisco • Get more from this author 
 
Posted in Enterprise Security, 19th August 2010 18:49�GMT 
 
The...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The latest example of why Linux is for  mentally retarded chimpanzees who ate too many lead paint chips as babies :<br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				<div>
					Originally Posted by <strong>TheRegister.co.uk</strong>
					
				</div>
				<div style="font-style:italic">By Dan Goodin in San Francisco • Get more from this author<br />
<br />
Posted in Enterprise Security, 19th August 2010 18:49�GMT<br />
<br />
The Linux kernel has finally been purged of a privilege-escalation vulnerability that for at least half a decade allowed untrusted local users to gain unfettered rights to the operating system's most secure locations.<br />
<br />
Maintainers of the central Linux component issued a patch last week that killed the bug, which allowed unprivileged users to gain root access. While Linux overlords stopped short of declaring it a security vulnerability, they stressed that the patch should be installed as soon as possible.<br />
<br />
<br />
“I'm tired of people trying to parse my words like I'm the Federal Reserve Chairman, just go update already,” developer Greg Kroah-Hartman said here.<br />
<br />
The vulnerability was described as long ago as 2005 by researcher Gael Delalleu, but it remained largely overlooked until Rafal Wojtczuk, a researcher at Invisible Things Lab, started investigating related issues. In a PDF paper published Tuesday, he outlined a method that exploits the underlying bug using the Xorg server, which is instrumental in providing graphical user interface functions in Linux and is also referred to as the X server.<br />
<br />
“One important aspect the attack demonstrates, is how difficult it is to bring security to a desktop platform, where one of the biggest challenges is to let applications talk to the GUI layer (e.g., X server in case of Linux), which usually involves a very fat GUI protocol (think X protocol, or Win32 GUI API) and a very complex GUI server, but at the same time keep things secure,” Joanna Rutkowska, a fellow security researcher at Invisible Things Lab blogged.<br />
<br />
The memory-corruption bug stems from two memory regions of the X server that grow in the opposite directions in the address space, an attribute inherited from the x86 architecture designed by Intel. Attackers can force the two regions to collide, causing critical control data to be replaced with values that allow the X server to be hijacked.<br />
<br />
The bulletin accompanying the kernel fix described the implementation of “a�guard�page�below�a�grow-down�stack�segment.”<br />
<br />
It's a fairly exotic exploit, and can only be used locally, unless combined with an unrelated vulnerability. Still, its ability to remain unrepaired in the kernel for more than five years challenges the contention among many Linux boosters that the open-source platform is more secure because anyone can examine its source code. The lesson here is that the ability to do so doesn't guarantee that anyone will, even when they have the kind of generous guidance provided by Delalleu.<br />
<br />
To be fair, some Linux distributions appear to have issued updates that closed the hole. SUSE Enterprise 9, 10, and 11 and some versions of openSUSE aren't vulnerable, according to H-Security, which said the SUSE security team issued a fix for the issue in 2004.<br />
<br />
But that only begs the question why such a fix was never incorporated in the kernel.</div>
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div>Now, I'm OpenBSD user (I'm using it right now on my laptop) :<br />
<br />
OpenBSD blackhole.hvc.rr.com 4.7 puffy-kernel#0 i386<br />
<br />
Linux will never be as secure as OpenBSD for political, marketing and technical reasons. In this specific case OpenBSD is not affected by such a security flaw because its kernel is thoroughly audited and uses the secure xf86 kernel aperture   driver for X with xenocara. Xenocara is OpenBSD's own version of Xorg. Theo De Raadt has  long known that stock Xorg is insecure (some archetectures worse than others)  so OpenBSD uses its own highly secure forked version<br />
<br />
Now even if this security bug existed for OpenBSD, theoretically, OpenBSD''s W^X stack write protection implementation would block it from becoming exploitable.  <br />
<br />
Linux is for bitches and dumb ones at that <br />
<br />
:banana:</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.intpcentral.com/forumdisplay.php?f=18"><![CDATA[Technology, Computers, & Gadgets]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Puffster</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42732</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>houses that stays in the air</title>
			<link>http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42618&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 15:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>by 2012, we should have over 9,999,999,999 human beings. all but useless unfortunately. 
 
so is it possible then, that instead of killing off people with man-created tsunamis/earthquakes/epidemics, we need to implement flying structures to solve our issues with overpopulation? 
 
if land is not...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>by 2012, we should have over 9,999,999,999 human beings. all but useless unfortunately.<br />
<br />
so is it possible then, that instead of killing off people with man-created tsunamis/earthquakes/epidemics, we need to implement flying structures to solve our issues with overpopulation?<br />
<br />
if land is not the problem then couldn't we make decoys of our resources and replicate them so that we will never run out?<br />
<br />
examples: <a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3513/3737460461_f2ee343617.jpg" target="_blank">http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3513/...f2ee343617.jpg</a><br />
<br />
films that inspired this thread: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYWcSfWxaf8&amp;feature=related" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYWcS...eature=related</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.intpcentral.com/forumdisplay.php?f=18"><![CDATA[Technology, Computers, & Gadgets]]></category>
			<dc:creator>cloudgaming</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42618</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Recent Approaches in Wireless and Networking</title>
			<link>http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42595&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:28:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://www.anyfinetworks.com/ 
 
http://www.compilednetworks.com/ 
 
http://www.uclp.ca/ 
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Speed_Downlink_Packet_Access</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.anyfinetworks.com/" target="_blank">http://www.anyfinetworks.com/</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.compilednetworks.com/" target="_blank">http://www.compilednetworks.com/</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.uclp.ca/" target="_blank">http://www.uclp.ca/</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Speed_Downlink_Packet_Access" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Sp..._Packet_Access</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.intpcentral.com/forumdisplay.php?f=18"><![CDATA[Technology, Computers, & Gadgets]]></category>
			<dc:creator>kuranes</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42595</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is Online Poker Rigged?</title>
			<link>http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42555&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:05:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>This is not a bad-beat conversation; everyone experiences bad beats when playing poker for any significant amount of time. 
 
I am approaching this with a more scientific attitude - have there been any credible studies to determine whether there are any patterns that emerge in online poker which...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This is not a bad-beat conversation; everyone experiences bad beats when playing poker for any significant amount of time.<br />
<br />
I am approaching this with a more scientific attitude - have there been any credible studies to determine whether there are any patterns that emerge in online poker which deviate from random outcomes?  In other words:<br />
<br />
The Question:<br />
<br />
Do some (or all) of the popular online poker platforms possess programming which deviates from a random card distribution?  If so - are there changes intended to produce action flops, hyper-aggressive play, improbable suckouts?  Are there changes designed to manipulate wins/losses on an individual level, such that players experience early wins followed by later losses, with the intention of encouraging reloads?  What other deviations may exist, and to what end?<br />
<br />
The Measurement:<br />
<br />
Not anecdotal.  Have there been any scientifically credible studies that have analyzed a statistically significant amount of play to demonstrate, one way or another, whether the cards are random?  Or more specifically - has the randomness of outcomes been tested across several different scenarios and critical hypotheses - as opposed to simply confirming that all 52 cards are equally likely to surface over time?  If there are studies on this, what were their conclusions, on a site-by-site basis or industry wide?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.intpcentral.com/forumdisplay.php?f=18"><![CDATA[Technology, Computers, & Gadgets]]></category>
			<dc:creator>Polemarch</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42555</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BUSTED</title>
			<link>http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42543&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:20:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[The one time I fail to run PeerBlock while I'm torrenting, we get a DMCA notice from Cox threatening to disconnect our service.  They very well may.  I done fucked up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The <i>one</i> time I fail to run PeerBlock while I'm torrenting, we get a DMCA notice from Cox threatening to disconnect our service.  They very well may.  I done fucked up.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.intpcentral.com/forumdisplay.php?f=18"><![CDATA[Technology, Computers, & Gadgets]]></category>
			<dc:creator>manza</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42543</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Knock-off iPhones??</title>
			<link>http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42541&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 21:20:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[My second cell phone in as many months has broken, and I don't think I can avoid getting an iPhone any longer.  I have serious issues with a cell phone company (AT&T) forming a monopoly over cell phone service for a piece of hardware.  However, I'm starting to understand this whole "unlocking"...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My second cell phone in as many months has broken, and I don't think I can avoid getting an iPhone any longer.  I have serious issues with a cell phone company (AT&amp;T) forming a monopoly over cell phone service for a piece of hardware.  However, I'm starting to understand this whole &quot;unlocking&quot; business and feel better about it since it's been upheld as legal in court.<br />
<br />
But I see people selling these chrome versions of iPhones for relatively low prices considering what they are offering, and claiming they are not &quot;clone phones,&quot; which only raises my suspicion that they are &quot;clone phones,&quot; which would mean a lot more if I knew what a &quot;clone phone&quot; was.  Are there knock-off iPhones on the market or something?  What exactly are these people selling?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.intpcentral.com/forumdisplay.php?f=18"><![CDATA[Technology, Computers, & Gadgets]]></category>
			<dc:creator>mchampagne</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42541</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Crypto Buzz</title>
			<link>http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42530&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:40:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[The winner of the UK "Cyber Security Challenge" first hurdle was announced.  Those looking for jobs in this industry were  supposedly going to be ushered in as a result of this process.  Through the "Open University". 
 
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/30/cyber_challenge_cracked/ 
 
The USA...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>The winner of the UK &quot;Cyber Security Challenge&quot; first hurdle was announced.  Those looking for jobs in this industry were  supposedly going to be ushered in as a result of this process.  Through the &quot;Open University&quot;.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07/30/cyber_challenge_cracked/" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/07...lenge_cracked/</a><br />
<br />
The USA has got some kind of contest going on also, having perhaps finally woken up to some possible future needs in this regard.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.uscyberchallenge.org/" target="_blank">http://www.uscyberchallenge.org/</a><br />
<br />
Meanwhile Ron Deibert soldiers on in the basement of the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs, with his &quot;Citizen Lab&quot;.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://citizenlab.org/" target="_blank">http://citizenlab.org/</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.intpcentral.com/forumdisplay.php?f=18"><![CDATA[Technology, Computers, & Gadgets]]></category>
			<dc:creator>kuranes</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42530</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vonage etc.</title>
			<link>http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42504&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:24:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm thinking of dumping AT&T due to the high cost, for at least the phone part of my comm needs.  Maybe keep their TV.  Internet connection - hmmmm. 
 
I'm wondering if anyone has had any experience with Vonage ?   
 
I had an all digital IP phone for a while with ATT Uverse, and people's voices...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I'm thinking of dumping AT&amp;T due to the high cost, for at least the phone part of my comm needs.  Maybe keep their TV.  Internet connection - hmmmm.<br />
<br />
I'm wondering if anyone has had any experience with Vonage ?  <br />
<br />
I had an all digital IP phone for a while with ATT Uverse, and people's voices were too loud in my ear.  Now, using ATT analog, the voices are too soft.  It may be the cordless phone ( no volume dial ) from Radio Shack that's to blame, but their phones worked OK ( for me anyway ) in the past.  And this one worked adequately when I first bought it.<br />
<br />
Also considering something called Consumer Cellular, which ( unlike Vonage ) is a completely new name for me.<br />
<br />
I think the consensus on &quot;magic jack&quot; here was thumbs down.<br />
<br />
I don't want a phone service that is cheap, but always fading in and out and dropping calls, since sometimes I have to pitch technology on my phone to people I don't know .</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://forums.intpcentral.com/forumdisplay.php?f=18"><![CDATA[Technology, Computers, & Gadgets]]></category>
			<dc:creator>kuranes</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.intpcentral.com/showthread.php?t=42504</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
